Is there a solution for ending crime, homelessness & mental health crisis in DC?

[Anonymous]

Who’s working towards it?! Violence interrupters. Come to about a dozen neighborhoods when lawnmower brigade rolls in from across the bridges! Last good sleep was when the national guard occupied the town after the idiots of 1/6. Quite frankly, lunatics on both sides. Normal folk suffer. Guess who’ll suffer the most? It ain’t me in the leafy multi-million house in NW. You are sacrificing entire generations to small fringe interests

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It pains me to say this but we need more conservative judges. Look at all the recent eviction cases for atrocious antisocial behavior and they all got dismissed. It’s all over the press.

Same for these biker idiots

You meant “conviction rates,” but I understood you. I also agree with you.

Prosecutors are the problem. Elected prosecutors, specifically.

This fact is not hidden (google it if you want. It’s been in the news for years):

- George Soros’ Open Society Foundation is buying the elections of leftist prosecutors.

These prosecutors are not ordinary democrats. I would not even call them “liberal.” They are leftists and very extreme.

Chesa Bodoin in San Francisco, others in LA, Chicago, DC, Philadelphia; even here in Fairfax county, all of them were

- hand-picked by The Open Society Foundations, and

- received overwhelming out of state “dark money” to bury their competitors and “win” elections.

Now you know the source of the problem.

I'm not sure what any of this has to do with DC where the main prosecutor of violent crime is not elected, but rather appointed by the President. I would suggest that those who don't understand the basics of DC, are not well-positioned to offer advice about solutions.

[Anonymous]

Nice deflection.

So, do you support the dark-money election of leftist prosecutors like Chesa Bodoin in San Francisco?

How about Kim Foxx in Chicago? Larry Krasner in Philadelphia?

[Anonymous]

What about dark money election of conservatives? Seriously cooks on both sides. Where are the normal folks?

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:Nice deflection.

So, do you support the dark-money election of leftist prosecutors like Chesa Bodoin in San Francisco?

How about Kim Foxx in Chicago? Larry Krasner in Philadelphia?

LOL. Talk about deflections. Maybe you want to reread the topic of this thread which doesn't have anything to do with Chicago, San Francisco or Philadelphia. I don't live in any of those places so I don't really care who their DAs are. On the other hand, I am concerned about the dark money that helped put Brett Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The council just voted to declare homelessness a “protected class”. San Francisco here we come.

What are you talking about? No it hasn't.

You apparently do not follow the news. Enjoy the descent.

I'm hoping my unhoused personal injury clients still have my business card. Now I can sue business owners for refusing entrance/service to the unhoused as well as property owners refusing to consider renting to them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The council just voted to declare homelessness a “protected class”. San Francisco here we come.

What are you talking about? No it hasn't.

You apparently do not follow the news. Enjoy the descent.

I'm hoping my unhoused personal injury clients still have my business card. Now I can sue business owners for refusing entrance/service to the unhoused as well as property owners refusing to consider renting to them.

Wait, what is this? Is this for real? Why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The council just voted to declare homelessness a “protected class”. San Francisco here we come.

What are you talking about? No it hasn't.

You apparently do not follow the news. Enjoy the descent.

I'm hoping my unhoused personal injury clients still have my business card. Now I can sue business owners for refusing entrance/service to the unhoused as well as property owners refusing to consider renting to them.

This is the future folks. It is now illegal in DC to deny a person who is caked in feces, erratically yelling and scaring off your paying customers from entering your establishment. You will also not be able to call the police to remove unruly homeless people from your establishment as trespassing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The council just voted to declare homelessness a “protected class”. San Francisco here we come.

What are you talking about? No it hasn't.

You apparently do not follow the news. Enjoy the descent.

I'm hoping my unhoused personal injury clients still have my business card. Now I can sue business owners for refusing entrance/service to the unhoused as well as property owners refusing to consider renting to them.

This is the future folks. It is now illegal in DC to deny a person who is caked in feces, erratically yelling and scaring off your paying customers from entering your establishment. You will also not be able to call the police to remove unruly homeless people from your establishment as trespassing.

When you couldn't make it as a lawyer and had to settle for being a shill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The council just voted to declare homelessness a “protected class”. San Francisco here we come.

What are you talking about? No it hasn't.

You apparently do not follow the news. Enjoy the descent.

I'm hoping my unhoused personal injury clients still have my business card. Now I can sue business owners for refusing entrance/service to the unhoused as well as property owners refusing to consider renting to them.

This is the future folks. It is now illegal in DC to deny a person who is caked in feces, erratically yelling and scaring off your paying customers from entering your establishment. You will also not be able to call the police to remove unruly homeless people from your establishment as trespassing.

When you couldn't make it as a lawyer and had to settle for being a shill.

You have just described half the population of DC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The council just voted to declare homelessness a “protected class”. San Francisco here we come.

What are you talking about? No it hasn't.

You apparently do not follow the news. Enjoy the descent.

I'm hoping my unhoused personal injury clients still have my business card. Now I can sue business owners for refusing entrance/service to the unhoused as well as property owners refusing to consider renting to them.

This is the future folks. It is now illegal in DC to deny a person who is caked in feces, erratically yelling and scaring off your paying customers from entering your establishment. You will also not be able to call the police to remove unruly homeless people from your establishment as trespassing.

Does anyone have any details on this!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The council just voted to declare homelessness a “protected class”. San Francisco here we come.

What are you talking about? No it hasn't.

You apparently do not follow the news. Enjoy the descent.

I'm hoping my unhoused personal injury clients still have my business card. Now I can sue business owners for refusing entrance/service to the unhoused as well as property owners refusing to consider renting to them.

This is the future folks. It is now illegal in DC to deny a person who is caked in feces, erratically yelling and scaring off your paying customers from entering your establishment. You will also not be able to call the police to remove unruly homeless people from your establishment as trespassing.

Does anyone have any details on this!

Someone literally spewed their poorly imaginative 💩 on DCUM and now you're asking for details of their poorly imaginative 💩? I sure hope it's a Friday

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The council just voted to declare homelessness a “protected class”. San Francisco here we come.

What are you talking about? No it hasn't.

You apparently do not follow the news. Enjoy the descent.

I'm hoping my unhoused personal injury clients still have my business card. Now I can sue business owners for refusing entrance/service to the unhoused as well as property owners refusing to consider renting to them.

This is the future folks. It is now illegal in DC to deny a person who is caked in feces, erratically yelling and scaring off your paying customers from entering your establishment. You will also not be able to call the police to remove unruly homeless people from your establishment as trespassing.

Does anyone have any details on this!

Someone literally spewed their poorly imaginative 💩 on DCUM and now you're asking for details of their poorly imaginative 💩? I sure hope it's a Friday

One purpose of adding homelessness as a protected class is to protect the rights of the homeless to public accommodation. That includes commercial establishments such as hotels, restaurants, department stores, etc.

Some may think that’s a good thing. Others may not. But that is indeed the thing that’s happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do other countries do? Wondering how many seem to have much less of a problem than we do. (Thinking of Western Europe)

They have public health systems that treat addiction like the health issue it is.

They had very strict immigration laws until recently and now they’re going south fast.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why DC attracts so many homeless, mentally ill, addicts and criminals?

Many of them get shipped here by dirtbag Republicans with the same mentality of Greg Abbott shipping illegals here.