Nope, untrue. Credit agencies stopped including traffic tickets on credit reports in 2016 as part of a lawsuit. The only things that can go on a credit report are debts incurred after a contract is signed or via bankruptcy. https://accountcontrol.com/News-Resources/Unpaid-Tickets-Traffic-Violations-Are-No-Longer-Reportable Virginia and Maryland drivers have zero incentive to pay camera tickets they receive in DC, and collection agencies are not a cost-effective way for DC to get that money back. The city would lose money on the deal. Your bit about DC being "quite notorious about making it impossible for people to get their camera tickets cancelled when their cars are stolen" also is untrue. We had a car stolen in DC and they racked up a number of camera tickets. All it took was sending in a copy of the police report and the tickets were canceled. |
No, there is no reciprocity for tickets issued via camera (there is reciprocity for tickets issued by a human, but we all know there is virtually zero human traffic enforcement in DC apart from parking tickets). https://www.washingtonpost.com/transportation/2021/12/28/dc-virginia-maryland-ticket-reciprocity/ |
Let me repeat, speed cameras do not issue traffic citations. If DC was serious about improving traffic safety they can very easily deploy human enforcement to do so and have reciprocity for the tickets. Speed cameras issue fines. Neither MD nor VA have any obligation to serve as free debt collectors for DC revenue generation. |
It’s almost like the law and everyone else has recognized that speed camera tickets are bullsh*t. This just provides more incentive for DC to increase in-person enforcement of traffic laws, if they actually cared about traffic safety and not, you know, revenue generation. |
This 100%. So many policies in DC are explicitly pro-crime and pro-vagrancy. As a law-abiding citizen living here it's just mind boggling. |
So you can rip down a residential street at 80MPH and not even get points on your license? WTF. |
The speed camera levies a fine against a vehicle and it’s owner. It does not levy a fine against a person because they cannot prove who was driving. In other jurisdictions, like Los Angeles, red light cameras take a photo of the driver as well and level a citation against the driver as the car owner unless the car owner identifies a different person that was driving the car at the time. However, California doesn’t have speed cameras. Only two states in the United States do not treat speed camera tickets as civil/administrative fines, Oregon and Arizona. Every other state treats it as a fine. It’s is not the job of MD or VA to be used as debt collectors for DC. |
| Why can't DC make a simple agreement with MD and VA, that before drivers in those states are re-issued licenses or other car business- they pay outstanding tickets to neighboring jurisdications? We have these things called computers--should be easy to info share. |
Disagree. Traffic enforcement by actual officers - for cars and cyclists - would be a better option. Instead, we have revenue generating speed cameras that only deter drivers when in the vicinity of the camera. |
I agree it's time for new blood after two terms, but are the other options better? |
Good idea. |
Yep, they are revenue generators, not deterrents. Most people just slow down near the cameras and then carry on with their reckless driving. Giving points would be much more effective. |
Because equity. |
| They will care when people start leaving. |
OK, it's happening now. When does the caring start? https://patch.com/district-columbia/washingtondc/dc-population-declines-largest-percentage-virginia-inches |