Do guys find thick legs or thin legs attractive?

[Anonymous]

Yes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thick thigh, tight calves, small ankles is ideal for me.

Are you seeing a lot of sagging calves?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thick thigh, tight calves, small ankles is ideal for me.

No such thing. If you want thick thighs you get the rest of the leg thick as well even the calves and ankles

Not true I’ve always had heavy thighs even as a little girl, but my bone structure is fine and delicate, so my legs are really long and my ankles and feet are narrow. Same with arms, and delicate wrists and long fingers. I’m strong with great muscle tone but just have a softer and curvier look to my body.

I’m a short waisted so basically all legs and arms.

Same. I was a soccer player for 18 years so have very thick muscular thighs. But, I have tiny ankles, slim calves (but muscled). I have a small waist, not fat. Not a huge @ss, but no pancake @ss either—just high and tight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thick thigh, tight calves, small ankles is ideal for me.

No such thing. If you want thick thighs you get the rest of the leg thick as well even the calves and ankles

Lol what. False

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't know what women you're looking at. Plenty women in the world exist w/thick thighs and no cankles.

Lol right? Like, this is absolutely hands down a more common combo than thick thighs and cankles (just bc cankles are somewhat rare). I don’t think OP understood this 20(…?!) year old at all

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know what women you're looking at. Plenty women in the world exist w/thick thighs and no cankles.

Lol right? Like, this is absolutely hands down a more common combo than thick thighs and cankles (just bc cankles are somewhat rare). I don’t think OP understood this 20(…?!) year old at all

Cankles aren't rare. Women with slim legs don't have cankles but women with more fat on their body and legs do.

[Anonymous]

Yes

[Anonymous]

I prefer the kind of legs that are wrapped around me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know what women you're looking at. Plenty women in the world exist w/thick thighs and no cankles.

Lol right? Like, this is absolutely hands down a more common combo than thick thighs and cankles (just bc cankles are somewhat rare). I don’t think OP understood this 20(…?!) year old at all

Cankles aren't rare. Women with slim legs don't have cankles but women with more fat on their body and legs do.

I feel like you might be confused about what you cankles are

[Anonymous]

As long as they cover my ears, I'm good with them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know what women you're looking at. Plenty women in the world exist w/thick thighs and no cankles.

Muscular thighs yes that one works out for but thick thighs come with cankles naturally

This just isn’t true. I am overweight and carry it all in my butt and thighs and lower belly. My ankles and wrists are very thin. My calves also have very little fat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wondering. A 20 something white guy said he found thick legs sexy. However the girls who have this type of legs usually have thick ankles or cankles and have more fat on the rest of their body. So should I be aiming to be thin or fat?

You should aim for how you like your ankles to be, guys come and go and one who would love you would rather you be happy with your ankles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wondering. A 20 something white guy said he found thick legs sexy. However the girls who have this type of legs usually have thick ankles or cankles and have more fat on the rest of their body. So should I be aiming to be thin or fat?

The women I see at the gym have thick legs because they have muscular thighs from squatting. Their ankles aren't thick and the rest of their body isn't fat either. This is a good look.

Thick thighs because you eat a lot and never exercise, and the rest of you is fat too, that's not a good look.

[Anonymous]

No, guys don't like fat women, even if it's the legs that are the fat part, and even if instead of calling them fat, you call them "thick."

Also, normal weight or slightly overweight--i.e. something less than a 30 BMI--isn't "thin."

If you were the athletic type you would have called your legs "toned" or "muscular." So we are talking fat legs here, aren't we?

Nope. Don't like 'em. Sorry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No, guys don't like fat women, even if it's the legs that are the fat part, and even if instead of calling them fat, you call them "thick."

Also, normal weight or slightly overweight--i.e. something less than a 30 BMI--isn't "thin."

If you were the athletic type you would have called your legs "toned" or "muscular." So we are talking fat legs here, aren't we?

Nope. Don't like 'em. Sorry.

I call my legs, which I developed through lifting weights, "big" or "huge". I don't know what other people call their legs. Seems personal!