|
https://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/17/education/edlife/edl-17business-t.html
Basically the article claims that business majors at schools outside the Top 50 don’t learn much. Interesting. I don’t know if I agree or disagree. What do you think? |
| This is old news. |
| Article is from 2011. I’d be interested in more recent perspectives. |
| You can teach business on the job. Finance is different. |
Really? Outside the top 50? Guess the same applies for law school?
|
I didn’t read the article, but I thought it was common knowledge that business admin/business management were bad majors for undergrad. Not necessarily finance, Econ, or accounting. |
|
Stupid. Accounting ... it's not that complicated to teach and you have to take the CPA exam.
This whole.. you don't learn anything unless you go to a top 50 school is so incredibly stupid. Finance is not all that complicated, then you go to work for somebody and you still have to get your certifications. |
AI will replace accountants inside a decade anyway |
| So pretty much every major is not “acceptable” at non-top schools. CS? “It’s an it degree.” Business? “It can be taught on the job.” Biology? |
| If employers are less inclined to hire business majors, they should be making that loud and clear for prospective business majors-and universities shouldn’t offer the degree. |
So? They will do it for Top 50 schools too. Besides the article is from 2011. |
FIFY |
|
Look at job placement statisitics for undergraduate business majors ---many have a job lined up before they graduate.
|
| I have 2 business degrees and I agree. Most skills can be learned on the job, I am encouraging my kids to major in other fields so they can learn how to think not just ace the exam. |
Yep. Until I see job postings seeking classics majors, I am skeptical of this article. |