Hilaria Baldwin - At it again

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The subbreddit is nasty. An example of blatant internalized misogyny in the name of Justice. Just. Eww. What's fascinating is the mob mentality that if you don't agree with their conspiracy theories you're Hillary or Alec or working for them. You'll be ganged up on and run out. Nasty's number one rule is if you call anyone a Karen she assumes your Hillary and will kick you out of the discussion, while these unhappy women who hate women try to shame other moms choices, bodies, clothes, and bully those poor exploited kids.

Maam, you are on page 571 of a thread called "Hilaria Baldwin- At it again." Maybe you should re-trace your steps and figure out how you got here.

[Anonymous]

This thread had dropped off page one of the Entertainment and Pop Culture forum. Silence from the positive picture poster. As soon as there are new comments, he/she/they is back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This thread had dropped off page one of the Entertainment and Pop Culture forum. Silence from the positive picture poster. As soon as there are new comments, he/she/they is back.

I haven't seen it drop off page one in months. Maybe off of recent topics, but always on page one of Entertainment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Someone on Reddit called Carmen a prostitot. That site is nasty.

This never happened btw

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread had dropped off page one of the Entertainment and Pop Culture forum. Silence from the positive picture poster. As soon as there are new comments, he/she/they is back.

I haven't seen it drop off page one in months. Maybe off of recent topics, but always on page one of Entertainment.

Haha! Whoever runs DCUM must be so happy at the amount of traffic this scandal brought his or her site. I mean, this is technically where this entire thing got started. If it wasn't for this site, she'd still be making money on the grift and telling the United Nations that she is a "Spanish Wellness Expert"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The subbreddit is nasty. An example of blatant internalized misogyny in the name of Justice. Just. Eww. What's fascinating is the mob mentality that if you don't agree with their conspiracy theories you're Hillary or Alec or working for them. You'll be ganged up on and run out. Nasty's number one rule is if you call anyone a Karen she assumes your Hillary and will kick you out of the discussion, while these unhappy women who hate women try to shame other moms choices, bodies, clothes, and bully those poor exploited kids.

Maybe that subreddit isn't a good fit for you. Try this one instead?
https://www.reddit.com/r/RachelDolezal/comments/noc0fe/we_love_rachel_dolezal_from_batumi_georgia/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread had dropped off page one of the Entertainment and Pop Culture forum. Silence from the positive picture poster. As soon as there are new comments, he/she/they is back.

I haven't seen it drop off page one in months. Maybe off of recent topics, but always on page one of Entertainment.

Haha! Whoever runs DCUM must be so happy at the amount of traffic this scandal brought his or her site. I mean, this is technically where this entire thing got started. If it wasn't for this site, she'd still be making money on the grift and telling the United Nations that she is a "Spanish Wellness Expert"

Maybe Hilary can get a cut. She’s the one that posts 20+ new stories every day, providing a never ending reel of material.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s also become fixated with the theory that some Internet “sleuth” supposedly came up with - which is that she and her hairdresser is having an affair.

I don’t know what she thinks she is playing at because her move her is so obvious. She is picking the most ridiculous theory that maybe one Reddit poster posted, and fixating on that, to demonstrate how ludicrous all of the comments about her online are.

Essentially by playing up this ludicrous theory she is essentially trying to discredit a myriad of legitimate and pretty sound observations of her.

Hilaria, you are a little too obvious to pull off the play. Just take a break from social media and just take care of yourself. No one thinks you are having an affair with your hairdresser.

Noboby ever suggested that over on Reddit. I mod the page and I can promise you 100% nobody EVER said that. That dumb hairdresser trying to get his 5 minutes. Pobrecita.

A day ago one of the crazies on that page posted a topless photo of herself, crowing that she felt the need to show Hillary that not everyone commenting was a "fat Karen." Were you the one who deleted that (I hope), or did the person see sense and delete it herself?

Hillary might be mentally unwell, but that subReddit has brought out ALL the crazies. Wow.

I'm thinking about sending the screenshot to the Daily Mail.

That never happened. Very suspicious of your motives here to discredit the subreddit. Awfully fishy. Everything I have seen there is valid criticism of our favorite Bostonian grifter.

Oh, yes, it did! I have the screenshot because I knew Nasty would delete it. She's a blonde woman in probably her early thirties, topless in her bedroom and holding her breasts.

Furthermore, yesterday ANOTHER crazy on the subReddit posted a photo of herself breastfeeding her baby. This was an attempt to mock Hillary's tendency to post breastfeeding photos of herself, yet this poster is doing the SAME THING: exploiting her little baby for attention online.

In case you forgot, that's the one where you can see a lot of records and a record player in the background; the baby is wearing a striped hat and a striped shirt underoveralls. Just to prove that I've still got the photo . I screenshot that one too.

There are some insane people on that subReddit, which is kind of fascinating in itself. The whole alleged "mission" of the page is now undermined by the misogyny and just plain craziness of the posters.

[Anonymous]

Oh, I always love a back up with screenshots. Waiting for mod response...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The subbreddit is nasty. An example of blatant internalized misogyny in the name of Justice. Just. Eww. What's fascinating is the mob mentality that if you don't agree with their conspiracy theories you're Hillary or Alec or working for them. You'll be ganged up on and run out. Nasty's number one rule is if you call anyone a Karen she assumes your Hillary and will kick you out of the discussion, while these unhappy women who hate women try to shame other moms choices, bodies, clothes, and bully those poor exploited kids.

+1 It is sickening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s also become fixated with the theory that some Internet “sleuth” supposedly came up with - which is that she and her hairdresser is having an affair.

I don’t know what she thinks she is playing at because her move her is so obvious. She is picking the most ridiculous theory that maybe one Reddit poster posted, and fixating on that, to demonstrate how ludicrous all of the comments about her online are.

Essentially by playing up this ludicrous theory she is essentially trying to discredit a myriad of legitimate and pretty sound observations of her.

Hilaria, you are a little too obvious to pull off the play. Just take a break from social media and just take care of yourself. No one thinks you are having an affair with your hairdresser.

Noboby ever suggested that over on Reddit. I mod the page and I can promise you 100% nobody EVER said that. That dumb hairdresser trying to get his 5 minutes. Pobrecita.

A day ago one of the crazies on that page posted a topless photo of herself, crowing that she felt the need to show Hillary that not everyone commenting was a "fat Karen." Were you the one who deleted that (I hope), or did the person see sense and delete it herself?

Hillary might be mentally unwell, but that subReddit has brought out ALL the crazies. Wow.

I'm thinking about sending the screenshot to the Daily Mail.

That never happened. Very suspicious of your motives here to discredit the subreddit. Awfully fishy. Everything I have seen there is valid criticism of our favorite Bostonian grifter.

Oh, yes, it did! I have the screenshot because I knew Nasty would delete it. She's a blonde woman in probably her early thirties, topless in her bedroom and holding her breasts.

Furthermore, yesterday ANOTHER crazy on the subReddit posted a photo of herself breastfeeding her baby. This was an attempt to mock Hillary's tendency to post breastfeeding photos of herself, yet this poster is doing the SAME THING: exploiting her little baby for attention online.

In case you forgot, that's the one where you can see a lot of records and a record player in the background; the baby is wearing a striped hat and a striped shirt underoveralls. Just to prove that I've still got the photo . I screenshot that one too.

There are some insane people on that subReddit, which is kind of fascinating in itself. The whole alleged "mission" of the page is now undermined by the misogyny and just plain craziness of the posters.

Wait, if you knew I was going to just delete it, why does it matter? Screenshot would be super helpful if you can post that on here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s also become fixated with the theory that some Internet “sleuth” supposedly came up with - which is that she and her hairdresser is having an affair.

I don’t know what she thinks she is playing at because her move her is so obvious. She is picking the most ridiculous theory that maybe one Reddit poster posted, and fixating on that, to demonstrate how ludicrous all of the comments about her online are.

Essentially by playing up this ludicrous theory she is essentially trying to discredit a myriad of legitimate and pretty sound observations of her.

Hilaria, you are a little too obvious to pull off the play. Just take a break from social media and just take care of yourself. No one thinks you are having an affair with your hairdresser.

Noboby ever suggested that over on Reddit. I mod the page and I can promise you 100% nobody EVER said that. That dumb hairdresser trying to get his 5 minutes. Pobrecita.

A day ago one of the crazies on that page posted a topless photo of herself, crowing that she felt the need to show Hillary that not everyone commenting was a "fat Karen." Were you the one who deleted that (I hope), or did the person see sense and delete it herself?

Hillary might be mentally unwell, but that subReddit has brought out ALL the crazies. Wow.

I'm thinking about sending the screenshot to the Daily Mail.

That never happened. Very suspicious of your motives here to discredit the subreddit. Awfully fishy. Everything I have seen there is valid criticism of our favorite Bostonian grifter.

Oh, yes, it did! I have the screenshot because I knew Nasty would delete it. She's a blonde woman in probably her early thirties, topless in her bedroom and holding her breasts.

Furthermore, yesterday ANOTHER crazy on the subReddit posted a photo of herself breastfeeding her baby. This was an attempt to mock Hillary's tendency to post breastfeeding photos of herself, yet this poster is doing the SAME THING: exploiting her little baby for attention online.

In case you forgot, that's the one where you can see a lot of records and a record player in the background; the baby is wearing a striped hat and a striped shirt underoveralls. Just to prove that I've still got the photo . I screenshot that one too.

There are some insane people on that subReddit, which is kind of fascinating in itself. The whole alleged "mission" of the page is now undermined by the misogyny and just plain craziness of the posters.

[b]Wait, if you knew I was going to just delete it, why does it matter? [/b]Screenshot would be super helpful if you can post that on here.

Well, you posted in this thread that it didn't happen, so clearly screenshots are the only proof that it did. Hey, haven't you said that your issue with Hillary is that she lied? Isn't that what you did when you said these pics were never posted on the subreddit?

The user who posted an image of herself breastfeeding, with her own baby visible in an image created just to...mock someone, was u/AmazingMeat. But I guess you already know that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

In case you forgot, that's the one where you can see a lot of records and a record player in the background; the baby is wearing a striped hat and a striped shirt underoveralls. Just to prove that I've still got the photo . I screenshot that one too.

There are some insane people on that subReddit, which is kind of fascinating in itself. The whole alleged "mission" of the page is now undermined by the misogyny and just plain craziness of the posters.

I'm confused. The photo got deleted from Reddit, the 10009'th one of her breastfeeding. So what are you upset about? Did you need that picture back up for some reason?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

In case you forgot, that's the one where you can see a lot of records and a record player in the background; the baby is wearing a striped hat and a striped shirt underoveralls. Just to prove that I've still got the photo . I screenshot that one too.

There are some insane people on that subReddit, which is kind of fascinating in itself. The whole alleged "mission" of the page is now undermined by the misogyny and just plain craziness of the posters.

I'm confused. The photo got deleted from Reddit, the 10009'th one of her breastfeeding. So what are you upset about? Did you need that picture back up for some reason?

The photo was not of Hillary breastfeeding. The photo was of a reddit user mimicking Hillary. This user included her own baby in the photo. I think that is exploitive, and really sick to put your own child into a pic just to mock someone you have never met.

[Anonymous]

Oh, you are talking about the lady with the breastfeeding picture as a meme from /u/amazingmeat? I can't post the link here because it's not allowed.

No, that one is still up (there is no nudity in it and the child's face is blocked), this is a snark sub, people post stuff like this. You are talking about a joke sub and a post made by somebody that goes by amazing meat. The sub is funny, it's supposed to be. As long as she's a joke, no advertisers will take her seriously.

I thought you were saying a titty popped out, that had my interest for sure! Dude you scared me. I thought some spammer had a full on mardi gras situation while I was gone and that it never showed up in the que.