Roe v Wade struck down

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Susan Collins is very disappointed

She can't really be serious here. She CANNOT be serious.

We'll, she's right.

Kavanaugh and Gorsuch are both smart men. They didn't get confused. Did they misspeak? Did they lie? Do they lack integrity?

Attorneys: Can Kav and Gorsuch and Amy B be impeached for lying under oath to Congress?

The LIED.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Finally, after the suctioning of 63 million growing babies

STFU you total POS!!

those were fetuses, not "babies"

grow a brain and learn the difference

I've been pregnant 3 times. Not once did any of my doctors (male or female) refer to my pregnancy with the word fetus.

Mine did.

But sounds like your pregnancies were wanted. Sounds like you were willing to gestate them to term, to go through labor and delivery, to have your body changed, to accept the danger of pregnancy and birthing, and to take on the responsibility of raising children. Not all women accept those things, and no government should be able to force them to.

Those doctors did nit know what I was thinking or planning to do when they first saw me.

Noticed that you didn't address the question of other women not accepting the choice you made to undergo a potentially life-threatening process.

No, because that's not what I was addressing. I'll say it again, no doctor, female or male, ever referred to my "fetus."

So? Why should we care?

Women who want their pregnancies should have access to the medical treatments that will allow them to sustain them and give birth to a healthy baby.

Women who DO NOT want their pregnancies should have access to the medical treatments that allow them to terminate the pregnancy and have a full and healthy recovery.

Women who want their pregnancies, but come to find that their pregnancies will result in a child that is not viable outside of the womb OR that the pregnancy may jeopardize their life should have access to the medical treatments that allow th to terminate the pregnancy and have a full and healthy recovery.

PERIOD.

So sick of "prolifers" putting the "rights" of a pregnancy above those of a fully formed, independent adult woman.

You should care because describing a growing baby as "just a fetus" is not accurate. Of course, that's not saying you can't maintain your pro abortion stance anyway

What kind of stupid twat thinks medically accurate terminology is “not accurate”?

"Just a fetus" is not what the medical community says.

“Fetus” is a medically accurate term.

I get that. You're ignoring the previous posts and trying to suggest I'm ignorant and uneducated. Not at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Younger generations have been more pro-life than their parents. The politics of this may not play out as intended.

On the other hand, this will lead to the birth of more babies that will grow up to vote for Democrats.

Younger generations are also less sexually active. And have fewer babies.

This decision may affect one or more of those statistics. Or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Susan Collins is very disappointed

She can't really be serious here. She CANNOT be serious.

We'll, she's right.

Kavanaugh and Gorsuch are both smart men. They didn't get confused. Did they misspeak? Did they lie? Do they lack integrity?

What I mean is that we all KNEW that they intended to overturn Roe. That's what they were there for. The three of them. It's the whole reason they are there - that, and getting more guns in more hands. Their answers were cagey and insincere, and there cannot be a person around who thought their answers ("settled precedent, lolol!") meant they were not going to toss that law over the second they got the chance. What's the point of this faux outrage? Just a little show for the idiots in back?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Finally, after the suctioning of 63 million growing babies

STFU you total POS!!

those were fetuses, not "babies"

grow a brain and learn the difference

I've been pregnant 3 times. Not once did any of my doctors (male or female) refer to my pregnancy with the word fetus.

Mine did.

But sounds like your pregnancies were wanted. Sounds like you were willing to gestate them to term, to go through labor and delivery, to have your body changed, to accept the danger of pregnancy and birthing, and to take on the responsibility of raising children. Not all women accept those things, and no government should be able to force them to.

Those doctors did nit know what I was thinking or planning to do when they first saw me.

Noticed that you didn't address the question of other women not accepting the choice you made to undergo a potentially life-threatening process.

No, because that's not what I was addressing. I'll say it again, no doctor, female or male, ever referred to my "fetus."

So? Why should we care?

Women who want their pregnancies should have access to the medical treatments that will allow them to sustain them and give birth to a healthy baby.

Women who DO NOT want their pregnancies should have access to the medical treatments that allow them to terminate the pregnancy and have a full and healthy recovery.

Women who want their pregnancies, but come to find that their pregnancies will result in a child that is not viable outside of the womb OR that the pregnancy may jeopardize their life should have access to the medical treatments that allow th to terminate the pregnancy and have a full and healthy recovery.

PERIOD.

So sick of "prolifers" putting the "rights" of a pregnancy above those of a fully formed, independent adult woman.

You should care because describing a growing baby as "just a fetus" is not accurate. Of course, that's not saying you can't maintain your pro abortion stance anyway

What kind of stupid twat thinks medically accurate terminology is “not accurate”?

"Just a fetus" is not what the medical community says.

“Fetus” is a medically accurate term.

I get that. You're ignoring the previous posts and trying to suggest I'm ignorant and uneducated. Not at all.

Just shut up already.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what's the first case we can get to the supreme Court to get this s*** turned around?

You are not understanding. It's up to Congress to make laws.

It would be nice if Congress passed a law making abortion legal nationwide.

However, if and when the GOP gets full control, they will outlaw abortion again.

It will be a seesaw unless SCOTUS rules on an ironclad case that can't be overturned.

That's what will keep abortion safe and legal in perpetuity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The US is officially a third-world country. I don't ever want to hear about "freedom" from the right-wing ever again. Bodily autonomy is not up to states to decide.

Time to dust off this old, yet always relevant, quote from Oscar Wilde “America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between.”

I guess after decadence comes regression, maybe Iran can give us some pointers on how to set up our Christian Republic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Finally, after the suctioning of 63 million growing babies

STFU you total POS!!

those were fetuses, not "babies"

grow a brain and learn the difference

I've been pregnant 3 times. Not once did any of my doctors (male or female) refer to my pregnancy with the word fetus.

Mine did.

But sounds like your pregnancies were wanted. Sounds like you were willing to gestate them to term, to go through labor and delivery, to have your body changed, to accept the danger of pregnancy and birthing, and to take on the responsibility of raising children. Not all women accept those things, and no government should be able to force them to.

Those doctors did nit know what I was thinking or planning to do when they first saw me.

Noticed that you didn't address the question of other women not accepting the choice you made to undergo a potentially life-threatening process.

No, because that's not what I was addressing. I'll say it again, no doctor, female or male, ever referred to my "fetus."

So? Why should we care?

Women who want their pregnancies should have access to the medical treatments that will allow them to sustain them and give birth to a healthy baby.

Women who DO NOT want their pregnancies should have access to the medical treatments that allow them to terminate the pregnancy and have a full and healthy recovery.

Women who want their pregnancies, but come to find that their pregnancies will result in a child that is not viable outside of the womb OR that the pregnancy may jeopardize their life should have access to the medical treatments that allow th to terminate the pregnancy and have a full and healthy recovery.

PERIOD.

So sick of "prolifers" putting the "rights" of a pregnancy above those of a fully formed, independent adult woman.

You should care because describing a growing baby as "just a fetus" is not accurate. Of course, that's not saying you can't maintain your pro abortion stance anyway

What kind of stupid twat thinks medically accurate terminology is “not accurate”?

"Just a fetus" is not what the medical community says.

“Fetus” is a medically accurate term.

I get that. You're ignoring the previous posts and trying to suggest I'm ignorant and uneducated. Not at all.

No one in this tangent said "just a fetus" until you. So if this is you're defense, I think you're proving your own self-description.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what's the first case we can get to the supreme Court to get this s*** turned around?

Probably not for at least 20+ years when Democrats maybe can get a liberal majority back on the Court.

No, wrong.

Make a case that the SCOTUS can't rule the wrong way. It can happen with the right strategy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Susan Collins is very disappointed

She can't really be serious here. She CANNOT be serious.

We'll, she's right.

Kavanaugh and Gorsuch are both smart men. They didn't get confused. Did they misspeak? Did they lie? Do they lack integrity?

Attorneys: Can Kav and Gorsuch and Amy B be impeached for lying under oath to Congress?

The LIED.

Of course not, because they didn't lie.

They used coded language to suggest that they respected Roe, but never promised to uphold it.

They allowed people to draw incorrect conclusions (knowingly), but didn't lie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Younger generations have been more pro-life than their parents. The politics of this may not play out as intended.

On the other hand, this will lead to the birth of more babies that will grow up to vote for Democrats.

Younger generations are also less sexually active. And have fewer babies.

This decision may affect one or more of those statistics. Or not.

DP. See earlier post. It's not true. People 18 to 29 are way way way more pro-choice than any previous generation

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This will have consequences. I already told my twin daughters not to apply to any colleges in those anti-abortion states.

Interesting emphasis on being able to obtain an abortion while in college.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Finally, after the suctioning of 63 million growing babies

STFU you total POS!!

those were fetuses, not "babies"

grow a brain and learn the difference

I've been pregnant 3 times. Not once did any of my doctors (male or female) refer to my pregnancy with the word fetus.

Mine did.

But sounds like your pregnancies were wanted. Sounds like you were willing to gestate them to term, to go through labor and delivery, to have your body changed, to accept the danger of pregnancy and birthing, and to take on the responsibility of raising children. Not all women accept those things, and no government should be able to force them to.

Those doctors did nit know what I was thinking or planning to do when they first saw me.

Noticed that you didn't address the question of other women not accepting the choice you made to undergo a potentially life-threatening process.

No, because that's not what I was addressing. I'll say it again, no doctor, female or male, ever referred to my "fetus."

So? Why should we care?

Women who want their pregnancies should have access to the medical treatments that will allow them to sustain them and give birth to a healthy baby.

Women who DO NOT want their pregnancies should have access to the medical treatments that allow them to terminate the pregnancy and have a full and healthy recovery.

Women who want their pregnancies, but come to find that their pregnancies will result in a child that is not viable outside of the womb OR that the pregnancy may jeopardize their life should have access to the medical treatments that allow th to terminate the pregnancy and have a full and healthy recovery.

PERIOD.

So sick of "prolifers" putting the "rights" of a pregnancy above those of a fully formed, independent adult woman.

You should care because describing a growing baby as "just a fetus" is not accurate. Of course, that's not saying you can't maintain your pro abortion stance anyway

What kind of stupid twat thinks medically accurate terminology is “not accurate”?

"Just a fetus" is not what the medical community says.

“Fetus” is a medically accurate term.

I get that. You're ignoring the previous posts and trying to suggest I'm ignorant and uneducated. Not at all.

Um no one is suggesting that. You are proving that by being obtuse and ignoring scientific language. If you ignore science you are ignorant. It is actually in the word itself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So gun safety should NOT be decided by state legislatures (such as the NY legislature), but abortion should be. Right.
It's horrific that a 6-3 majority thinks so little of precedent, of lying under oath, or of women's privacy rights. I had an abortion at age 22--so grateful I lived in a country (not the US) where abortion was safe and legal.
There will be A LOT of litigation surrounding this, since your right to an abortion will vary depending on where you live--denying you equal protection of the laws.

This is a right expressly written in the Constitution.
This is the argument that will make abortion safe and legal forever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Younger generations have been more pro-life than their parents. The politics of this may not play out as intended.

On the other hand, this will lead to the birth of more babies that will grow up to vote for Democrats.

Younger generations are also less sexually active. And have fewer babies.

This decision may affect one or more of those statistics. Or not.

DP. See earlier post. It's not true. People 18 to 29 are way way way more pro-choice than any previous generation

Pro choice about what issue? Pro abortion?