OFFICIAL MCPS BOE Race & Candidates Discussion

Anonymous
To make it easy for access of information and discussion, please keep the discussion limited to this thread.

At the deadline Friday, 18 people had filed as candidates for this year’s Montgomery County Board of Education election. All three races are contested and 13 people filed for the open at-large seat. The filing deadline was 9 p.m. Friday (Jan 24, 2020)

Seats Open

There are three seats open on the school board in this election — at-large, District 2 and District 4. District 2 incumbent Rebecca Smondrowski and District 4 incumbent Shebra Evans filed for re-election. At-large board member Jeanette Dixon announced in December she would not seek re-election


Compensation

School board members receive a $25,000 annual salary, aside from the board president, who receives $29,000.

Election Dates
The primary election is April 28, and the general election is Nov. 3. A primary will be held for the at-large and District 4 races, since both have more than twice as many candidates as available seats. The same was not true in District 2; both candidates will advance to the general election.

Candidates

Mitra Ahadpour, of Potomac. Ahadpour is a primary care physician whose platform includes an emphasis on students’ social, physical and mental well-being, improving student engagement, increasing transparency and providing “innovative professional development opportunities for teachers,” according to her Facebook page.

Stephen Austin, of Bethesda. Austin, who works in finance, is the founder of the Facebook group Montgomery County MD Neighbors for Local Schools. It has more than 7,000 members, largely comprised of Montgomery County residents who oppose long bus rides for students to and from school and who advocate for transparency from the school board and MCPS. Along with a push for transparency, Austin says his platform will emphasize fiscal responsibility. Austin has two children in MCPS.

Anil Chaudhry, of Potomac. Chaudhry’s candidate website says his platform will focus on community engagement in decision-making and ensuring MCPS leadership has resources to “improve educational outcomes for all children in a fiscally responsible and sustainable way.” Chaudhry has three children in MCPS and previously served in the United States Army.

Sunil Dasgupta, of Silver Spring. Dasgupta is the program director for the political science program at the University of Maryland Baltimore County at The Universities at Shady Grove. He is chair of the Montgomery County Council of Parent Teacher Association’s Health and Wellness Committee. His platform focuses on strengthening bonds between teachers and students, hiring more teachers, staff and counselors and investing in student and staff members’ health and safety. Dasgupta has three children in MCPS.

Paul Geller, of Olney. Geller is a community activist who has served as president and vice president of the Montgomery County Council of Parent-Teacher Associations. Geller’s candidate website says he will push for more leniency for students in crowded schools to transfer to schools with more space, less testing and more efficient and innovative school renovations. He also wants more schools to have solar panels.

Jay Guan, of Clarksburg. Guan is an aerospace engineer whose campaign includes advocating for more access to science, technology, engineering, arts and math curriculum (STEAM), strengthening community bonds and family engagement, and strengthening MCPS transparency and accountability. Guan has a 4-year-old child.


Lynne Harris, of Silver Spring. Harris is a former president of the MCCPTA. Her aim, if elected, would be to elevate the student voice in Montgomery County Public Schools’ decision-making processes, she said in a recent interview.

Collins Odongo, of Burtonsville. Odongo does not list a candidate website or social media pages. He has served as a cluster coordinator in Paint Branch for the Montgomery County Council of Parent Teacher Associations.Cameron Rhode, of Gaithersburg. Rhode is a 2012 Poolesville High School graduate who says he is committed to listening to and representing the voices of the community and will focus on improving students’ physical and mental health.

Pavel Sukhobok, of Rockville. Sukhobok’s candidacy website says he wants to “get politics out of education” and “bring common sense back in.” If elected, he would want to review MCPS grading policies, improve curriculum and test all students at a young age for “learning differences,” according to his website. He also says redistricting “is not the answer” to solve crowding problems and increase diversity.

Lumpoange Thomas, of Garrett Park. Thomas does not list a candidate website or social media pages.

Dalbin Osorio, of Gaithersburg. Osorio’s website says he is a social worker who aims to retain and promote quality teachers, expand access to alternative programs at the high school level and reduce the achievement gap.

Darwin Romero, of Silver Spring. The candidate website listed for Romero did not work as of Friday afternoon. Romero ran unsuccessfully for a seat on the Montgomery County Council in 2018. At the time, he said he was a construction manager.

District 2

Michael Fryar, of Gaithersburg. Fryar, an attorney and former elementary school teacher, said in a recent interview that his platform will include his position that all students should attend their neighborhood schools. He also wants to figure out “why young men are no longer choosing college as an option and what we can do to stop that trend” and addressing issues “across the board” regarding gender, gender identity and mental health problems. Fryar has two children at Fields Road Elementary School.

Rebecca Smondrowski, of Gaithersburg. Smondrowski is the incumbent in the District 2 race. She has been on the school board since 2012. She is chair of the board’s Special Populations Committee and a member of the Policy Management Committee. She is also a member of the Communication and Stakeholder Engagement Committee. Prior to joining the board, Smondrowski served as the legislative aide for then-state Sen. Roger Manno and was an active member of local and county parent-teacher associations.

District 4

Shebra Evans, Silver Spring. Evans is the incumbent in the District 4 race and the current board president. Evans was elected in 2016 and is a member of the board’s Strategic Planning Committee. She is a former financial analyst. Evans has two daughters in MCPS.

Ehren Park Reynolds, of Silver Spring. Park Reynolds does not list a candidate website or social media pages.

Steve Solomon, of Rockville. Solomon, a local radio show host, originally filed as a candidate in the at-large race, but switched to District 4 as the at-large field became more saturated. His website lists priorities ranging from revising the school district’s policy on snow days to “keeping schools local” and ensuring all schools have basic services such as heat and functioning equipment.

Source: https://bethesdamagazine.com/bethesda-beat/schools/as-filing-deadline-looms-16-candidates-have-filed-for-school-board-race/?utm_source=Bethesda+Magazine+Master+List&utm_campaign=f7da8f2c34-Beat-01.27.20&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_1bbe9df5d9-f7da8f2c34-105213361&mc_cid=f7da8f2c34&mc_eid=142b96f9a7


Anonymous
Can somebody explain what at-large vs. district means? Is there a difference between duties? Thank you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Can somebody explain what at-large vs. district means? Is there a difference between duties? Thank you.


At large means that you can live anywhere in the county. District means that you have to live in that board of education election district. (For example, you have to live in District 4 in order to be eligible to run for the District 4 seat.)

But the duties are the same, and everybody gets to vote for every seat. (For example, you get to vote in the District 4 race, even if you don't live in District 4.)
Anonymous
Candidates that I seem to like this far but would like to see in depth interviews from include:

Stephen Austin

Jay Guan

Pavel Sukhobok

Dalbin Osorio

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Candidates that I seem to like this far but would like to see in depth interviews from include:

Stephen Austin

Jay Guan

Pavel Sukhobok

Dalbin Osorio



Really? The first three on your list are high on my really-hope-they-lose list. Not sure about the fourth.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Candidates that I seem to like this far but would like to see in depth interviews from include:

Stephen Austin

Jay Guan

Pavel Sukhobok

Dalbin Osorio



Really? The first three on your list are high on my really-hope-they-lose list. Not sure about the fourth.


You’re entitled to your opinion as an I.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can somebody explain what at-large vs. district means? Is there a difference between duties? Thank you.


At large means that you can live anywhere in the county. District means that you have to live in that board of education election district. (For example, you have to live in District 4 in order to be eligible to run for the District 4 seat.)

But the duties are the same, and everybody gets to vote for every seat. (For example, you get to vote in the District 4 race, even if you don't live in District 4.)


Thank you for answering my question!
Anonymous
Candidates that I seem to like this far but would like to see in depth interviews from include:

Stephen Austin

Jay Guan

Pavel Sukhobok

Dalbin Osorio


I agree 100%. This is also the first year that I have seen so many people running and a more thorough (meaning at least two sentences hah) being written about each candidate. The BOR is usually a lock in picking their own candidates in concert with like minded MCPS staffers, the union and MCCPTA. Its an expectation of MCCPTA that they get a cake walk onto the board when they run. If you want anyone to win other than the handpicked MCPS choices then you need to get out and help campaign for the others with people beyond just parents. Most voters have no idea if they do not have kids. The bussing and rezoning initiatives is catching the attention of other residents now but they don't know or understand the huge back log of other MCPS problems.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Candidates that I seem to like this far but would like to see in depth interviews from include:

Stephen Austin

Jay Guan

Pavel Sukhobok

Dalbin Osorio


I agree 100%. This is also the first year that I have seen so many people running and a more thorough (meaning at least two sentences hah) being written about each candidate. The BOR is usually a lock in picking their own candidates in concert with like minded MCPS staffers, the union and MCCPTA. Its an expectation of MCCPTA that they get a cake walk onto the board when they run. If you want anyone to win other than the handpicked MCPS choices then you need to get out and help campaign for the others with people beyond just parents. Most voters have no idea if they do not have kids. The bussing and rezoning initiatives is catching the attention of other residents now but they don't know or understand the huge back log of other MCPS problems.


Nope. Nobody was "handpicking" anybody, whatever that means. Your objection is that more voters voted for the candidates you didn't support than the candidates you did.
Anonymous
Who's going to make MCPS do a better job with dyslexia and other learning disabilities?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Candidates that I seem to like this far but would like to see in depth interviews from include:

Stephen Austin

Jay Guan

Pavel Sukhobok

Dalbin Osorio


I agree 100%. This is also the first year that I have seen so many people running and a more thorough (meaning at least two sentences hah) being written about each candidate. The BOR is usually a lock in picking their own candidates in concert with like minded MCPS staffers, the union and MCCPTA. Its an expectation of MCCPTA that they get a cake walk onto the board when they run. If you want anyone to win other than the handpicked MCPS choices then you need to get out and help campaign for the others with people beyond just parents. Most voters have no idea if they do not have kids. The bussing and rezoning initiatives is catching the attention of other residents now but they don't know or understand the huge back log of other MCPS problems.


Nope. Nobody was "handpicking" anybody, whatever that means. Your objection is that more voters voted for the candidates you didn't support than the candidates you did.


No not at all. I simply remember all the years before the kids were in school when we had no idea about all the problems in MCPS. We happily voted the Apple Ballot because we like teachers. Now we know that the Apple ballot has nothing to do with teachers. The Washington post also had an article a few back on how the shady the whole pay to play thing was with the union endorsement. The union spends $$ getting out those apple ballots and locks people out.

MCCPTA even though its supposed to not be political will have individuals (who are friends) of the members running lean on others to get support for MCCPTA candidates. Being at the top of MCCPTA means that you go along with MCPS to get access to MCPS staff. With the exception of Paul Geller who seems to be somewhat of a well meaning nut the former MCCPTA members on the board and running do not stand up to MCPS. Smondronski is the only one who has disagreed with 2.0 and bussing but she has never been strong enough to speak forcefully enough against the others. She is sort of the Susan Collins of the BOE.

This time around there seems to more information out there and with the bussing/rezoning there is an issue where candidates need to take a stand. If you want bussing and more 2.0 like disasters then by all means go for re-electing Shebra Evans and vote in Lynne Harris.


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:

No not at all. I simply remember all the years before the kids were in school when we had no idea about all the problems in MCPS. We happily voted the Apple Ballot because we like teachers. Now we know that the Apple ballot has nothing to do with teachers. The Washington post also had an article a few back on how the shady the whole pay to play thing was with the union endorsement. The union spends $$ getting out those apple ballots and locks people out.

MCCPTA even though its supposed to not be political will have individuals (who are friends) of the members running lean on others to get support for MCCPTA candidates. Being at the top of MCCPTA means that you go along with MCPS to get access to MCPS staff. With the exception of Paul Geller who seems to be somewhat of a well meaning nut the former MCCPTA members on the board and running do not stand up to MCPS. Smondronski is the only one who has disagreed with 2.0 and bussing but she has never been strong enough to speak forcefully enough against the others. She is sort of the Susan Collins of the BOE.

This time around there seems to more information out there and with the bussing/rezoning there is an issue where candidates need to take a stand. If you want bussing and more 2.0 like disasters then by all means go for re-electing Shebra Evans and vote in Lynne Harris.



PP, if you're picking candidates based on their stance on busing, then you might as well be picking candidates based on their stance on the Blair Witch. There is no proposal for busing. It's a bogeyman designed to scare people. And it's working.

Also, when I vote in elections I haven't educated myself about, I blame myself, not others.
Anonymous
The first rule of thumb is to pick up the "Apple Ballot" at the polls. You should NOT vote for any of their recommended candidates. They are all going to be the most radical candidate on the ballot and they will all be 100% invested in social engineering taking place in MCPS.

#Vote against the Apple Ballot 2020
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Candidates that I seem to like this far but would like to see in depth interviews from include:

Stephen Austin

Jay Guan

Pavel Sukhobok

Dalbin Osorio


I agree 100%. This is also the first year that I have seen so many people running and a more thorough (meaning at least two sentences hah) being written about each candidate. The BOR is usually a lock in picking their own candidates in concert with like minded MCPS staffers, the union and MCCPTA. Its an expectation of MCCPTA that they get a cake walk onto the board when they run. If you want anyone to win other than the handpicked MCPS choices then you need to get out and help campaign for the others with people beyond just parents. Most voters have no idea if they do not have kids. The bussing and rezoning initiatives is catching the attention of other residents now but they don't know or understand the huge back log of other MCPS problems.


Nope. Nobody was "handpicking" anybody, whatever that means. Your objection is that more voters voted for the candidates you didn't support than the candidates you did.


No not at all. I simply remember all the years before the kids were in school when we had no idea about all the problems in MCPS. We happily voted the Apple Ballot because we like teachers. Now we know that the Apple ballot has nothing to do with teachers. The Washington post also had an article a few back on how the shady the whole pay to play thing was with the union endorsement. The union spends $$ getting out those apple ballots and locks people out.

MCCPTA even though its supposed to not be political will have individuals (who are friends) of the members running lean on others to get support for MCCPTA candidates. Being at the top of MCCPTA means that you go along with MCPS to get access to MCPS staff. With the exception of Paul Geller who seems to be somewhat of a well meaning nut the former MCCPTA members on the board and running do not stand up to MCPS. Smondronski is the only one who has disagreed with 2.0 and bussing but she has never been strong enough to speak forcefully enough against the others. She is sort of the Susan Collins of the BOE.

This time around there seems to more information out there and with the bussing/rezoning there is an issue where candidates need to take a stand. If you want bussing and more 2.0 like disasters then by all means go for re-electing Shebra Evans and vote in Lynne Harris.




I would also vote the apple ballot too. I was ignorant and thought I was doing the right thing. I guarantee you that the vast majority of Montgomery voters also simply vote the apple ballot too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Candidates that I seem to like this far but would like to see in depth interviews from include:

Stephen Austin

Jay Guan

Pavel Sukhobok

Dalbin Osorio


I agree 100%. This is also the first year that I have seen so many people running and a more thorough (meaning at least two sentences hah) being written about each candidate. The BOR is usually a lock in picking their own candidates in concert with like minded MCPS staffers, the union and MCCPTA. Its an expectation of MCCPTA that they get a cake walk onto the board when they run. If you want anyone to win other than the handpicked MCPS choices then you need to get out and help campaign for the others with people beyond just parents. Most voters have no idea if they do not have kids. The bussing and rezoning initiatives is catching the attention of other residents now but they don't know or understand the huge back log of other MCPS problems.


Nope. Nobody was "handpicking" anybody, whatever that means. Your objection is that more voters voted for the candidates you didn't support than the candidates you did.


No not at all. I simply remember all the years before the kids were in school when we had no idea about all the problems in MCPS. We happily voted the Apple Ballot because we like teachers. Now we know that the Apple ballot has nothing to do with teachers. The Washington post also had an article a few back on how the shady the whole pay to play thing was with the union endorsement. The union spends $$ getting out those apple ballots and locks people out.

MCCPTA even though its supposed to not be political will have individuals (who are friends) of the members running lean on others to get support for MCCPTA candidates. Being at the top of MCCPTA means that you go along with MCPS to get access to MCPS staff. With the exception of Paul Geller who seems to be somewhat of a well meaning nut the former MCCPTA members on the board and running do not stand up to MCPS. Smondronski is the only one who has disagreed with 2.0 and bussing but she has never been strong enough to speak forcefully enough against the others. She is sort of the Susan Collins of the BOE.

This time around there seems to more information out there and with the bussing/rezoning there is an issue where candidates need to take a stand. If you want bussing and more 2.0 like disasters then by all means go for re-electing Shebra Evans and vote in Lynne Harris.




I would also vote the apple ballot too. I was ignorant and thought I was doing the right thing. I guarantee you that the vast majority of Montgomery voters also simply vote the apple ballot too.
I meant to add that I have just become aware of that and this might be the first year that I really pay attention to who I vote for. The BOE didn't feel like such an important vote so the apple ballot worked for me. This year will be different.
post reply Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: