EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just saw an article that their youngest daughter (Vivienne) has dropped “Pitt” from her last name. She’s 15. My assessment (aka total speculation) is:

Brad Pitt was a terrible dad. Uninterested in his kids, self absorbed, abusive when drunk. At the same time, for a 15 year old to drop her dad’s name - knowing it will make news and be messy - she must really hate him. In a way that maybe a bitter ex wife would encourage. Dropping “Pitt” in such a public way seems calculated and vindictive and not something most 15 year olds do. It seems like something a kid wouldn’t do without a parent egging them on. So team neither parent - hope these kids have some healthy role models in their life beyond Brad and Angie.

Do you know what would be the ultimate burn to Jolie and those kids she has turned against him? If he had another family with his new girlfriend and he showed the world that he’s a good dad and Jolie is the problem/parental alienator. And then he cut those kids out of his will and left everything to his new family. That would really burn Jolie, seeing as she is seemingly broke and desperately in need of money.

You can have as negative opinion of him as you wish but he hasn't shown himself to be vindictive or to hate his children or treat them badly, apart from the plane incident. There's no reason to think that he would cut off his children like you are hoping.

Apart from the time he got drunk and appears to have had a physical altercation with one of them…


The apart is doing a lot of work in that thought

If you read the FBI report, Jolie “thought” he was going to hit a kid and she jumped on his back. He never hit the kid and probably wouldn’t have done so. I think Jolie wanted out, started planting seeds in the kids about abuse and took advantage of the next situation to create a false narrative which by that time, made the kids afraid of him.

That’s what some tabloids reported. That she wanted to leave him and get custody of the kids. She started alienating him from the children and picking fights with him. Even her so called “injuries” that she reported to the FBI were from Brad defending himself from her attack after she put him into a chokehold. She attacked him, but acts as if she is a victim of abuse.

All the allegations she has made haven’t been bought by any of the law enforcement agencies she called to investigate him or the family law judge. He’s not someone who is a danger to the kids. She is nuts and resents him and wants the kids to herself. I always knew she saw those kids as hers and wouldn’t let him be near him if they ever split. I figured she would create some kind of allegations in order to get custody. She’s someone who should have only ever adopted and been a single parent. She has no ability to co-parent at all and never let Brad have a say in the kids upbringing.

She didn't make Brad be alcoholic. He said he pushed the drinking as far as he could. He wasn't safe around the kids. She probably should've left sooner.

Why was he drinking so heavily? The marriage had gone bad. They were both miserable together. He was probably only staying for the kids, as he probably knew she would pull something like the stunt she did to get custody.

What kind of mother cuts a father out of her children’s lives? Not a very good one. She is only harming her children who will have emotional scars from the ugliness she insists on perpetuating. It’s been almost a decade of her repeating the same allegations over and over again. She is like a broken record who can’t move on and has nothing else to walk about.

Maybe he shouldn't have been an abusive drunk and then lie about it. Then continue to lie about the kids relationship with him.

Source about the kids?

dp i remember there was a story he was mad she took shiloh took jamaica for her birthday. There's multiple people articles too saying he has a pretty good relationship. Though this one is a funny since it makes the kids sound like they were all in their late teens. The twins had just turned 14 lol. What life

Pitt “still has a pretty good relationship” with his children, according to the insider. Brad has dinner with his younger kids when they are all in L.A. Since the kids are older now, they have their own life and friends,” the insider told the magazine.

Talk about being short sighted. I guess he thought they wouldn't say anything and would play along. I googled the jamaica thing and they went to a literary festival. If he wanted the day he could have asked the court for it or went to Jamaica too. The real reason is because the guy she's seeing went with them.

Is that a joke?

No? There have been times where by DH has had to ask the court to rearrange days so he could have a holiday with his son. Brad's not helpless in the matter.

But these two have a notoriously bad custody arrangement and a terrible time in family court. Your situation is the norm while these two have something else.

So dont try? What a lame excuse. Custody arrangements can be changed around. Instead of complaining about it, he should have filed with the court.

Sounds like you wouldn't be able to stand being married to her either.

The Jolie defenders keep claiming Brad is bad because he was “an abusive alcoholic” when Jolie is known to have been hooked on a number of hard drugs, and quite honestly, I think any man who was with a lunatic like Jolie for 12 years would be driven to drink. He was a mellow stoner with Jen, but being with Jolie worsened his drinking. Notice that he doesn’t have the same problem anymore now that he’s not with her.

He wasn't just a mellow stoner. By his own words he had issues with depending weed to a point it negatively impacted his mental health.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I bet they’ve spent millions on attorney fees.

My guess is she’s done a bang up job alienating those children from him, and at the same time he was a terrible dad and bad partner. Poor kids, they are pawns. Hope she grows up soon.

Sounds like you recognize that there’s hope she could change, but he’s a lost cause.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jolie called the FBI and CPS to make her allegations about Brad. No law enforcement agency thought there was any merit to her allegations. He was cleared and never prosecuted. Yet posters in here insist on slandering his name based on a crazy woman’s allegations that he was cleared of.

She didn’t call. The call was made by flight attendants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I bet they’ve spent millions on attorney fees.

My guess is she’s done a bang up job alienating those children from him, and at the same time he was a terrible dad and bad partner. Poor kids, they are pawns. Hope she grows up soon.

Sounds like you recognize that there’s hope she could change, but he’s a lost cause.

DP. He was blocked from parenting his children when married and blocked from parenting his children after the divorce started.

As a father, he was a lost cause from the beginning - because Angelina Jolie prevented him from it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just saw an article that their youngest daughter (Vivienne) has dropped “Pitt” from her last name. She’s 15. My assessment (aka total speculation) is:

Brad Pitt was a terrible dad. Uninterested in his kids, self absorbed, abusive when drunk. At the same time, for a 15 year old to drop her dad’s name - knowing it will make news and be messy - she must really hate him. In a way that maybe a bitter ex wife would encourage. Dropping “Pitt” in such a public way seems calculated and vindictive and not something most 15 year olds do. It seems like something a kid wouldn’t do without a parent egging them on. So team neither parent - hope these kids have some healthy role models in their life beyond Brad and Angie.

Do you know what would be the ultimate burn to Jolie and those kids she has turned against him? If he had another family with his new girlfriend and he showed the world that he’s a good dad and Jolie is the problem/parental alienator. And then he cut those kids out of his will and left everything to his new family. That would really burn Jolie, seeing as she is seemingly broke and desperately in need of money.

You can have as negative opinion of him as you wish but he hasn't shown himself to be vindictive or to hate his children or treat them badly, apart from the plane incident. There's no reason to think that he would cut off his children like you are hoping.

Apart from the time he got drunk and appears to have had a physical altercation with one of them…


The apart is doing a lot of work in that thought

If you read the FBI report, Jolie “thought” he was going to hit a kid and she jumped on his back. He never hit the kid and probably wouldn’t have done so. I think Jolie wanted out, started planting seeds in the kids about abuse and took advantage of the next situation to create a false narrative which by that time, made the kids afraid of him.

That’s what some tabloids reported. That she wanted to leave him and get custody of the kids. She started alienating him from the children and picking fights with him. Even her so called “injuries” that she reported to the FBI were from Brad defending himself from her attack after she put him into a chokehold. She attacked him, but acts as if she is a victim of abuse.

All the allegations she has made haven’t been bought by any of the law enforcement agencies she called to investigate him or the family law judge. He’s not someone who is a danger to the kids. She is nuts and resents him and wants the kids to herself. I always knew she saw those kids as hers and wouldn’t let him be near him if they ever split. I figured she would create some kind of allegations in order to get custody. She’s someone who should have only ever adopted and been a single parent. She has no ability to co-parent at all and never let Brad have a say in the kids upbringing.

She didn't make Brad be alcoholic. He said he pushed the drinking as far as he could. He wasn't safe around the kids. She probably should've left sooner.

Brad did drug testing with CPS. He went to AA and got sober. Just because someone was an alcoholic once doesn’t mean they are cut out of their kids lives forever. He didn’t present any danger to the children after he got clean and Jolie still fought to deny him custody of his children. I think she’s an evil woman who purposely alienated a father from his children. Just because she was done with him doesn’t mean her children didn’t need a father in their lives. But she only wanted him to pay her bills while denying him a relationship with his kids.

Naive or ignorant PP? You have obviously never experienced an abusive alcoholic or drug induced parent. Goody to you. The oldest two kids were approximately 16 and 14 when Pitt allegedly completed his twelve-step program. They were old enough to form their own opinions and from their own experiences with Pitt they did not want to be around him. At eleven-years of age, I knew that my father was a POS and I did not want a relationship of his convenience. I don't know why so many posters think children cannot formulate independent thoughts and opinions of their own.

And if your mother was as crazy as Jolie, did you also want nothing to do with her? Or do kids not think this about their crazy mothers?

Seems like you lack basic reading comprehension.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just saw an article that their youngest daughter (Vivienne) has dropped “Pitt” from her last name. She’s 15. My assessment (aka total speculation) is:

Brad Pitt was a terrible dad. Uninterested in his kids, self absorbed, abusive when drunk. At the same time, for a 15 year old to drop her dad’s name - knowing it will make news and be messy - she must really hate him. In a way that maybe a bitter ex wife would encourage. Dropping “Pitt” in such a public way seems calculated and vindictive and not something most 15 year olds do. It seems like something a kid wouldn’t do without a parent egging them on. So team neither parent - hope these kids have some healthy role models in their life beyond Brad and Angie.

Do you know what would be the ultimate burn to Jolie and those kids she has turned against him? If he had another family with his new girlfriend and he showed the world that he’s a good dad and Jolie is the problem/parental alienator. And then he cut those kids out of his will and left everything to his new family. That would really burn Jolie, seeing as she is seemingly broke and desperately in need of money.

You can have as negative opinion of him as you wish but he hasn't shown himself to be vindictive or to hate his children or treat them badly, apart from the plane incident. There's no reason to think that he would cut off his children like you are hoping.

Apart from the time he got drunk and appears to have had a physical altercation with one of them…


The apart is doing a lot of work in that thought

If you read the FBI report, Jolie “thought” he was going to hit a kid and she jumped on his back. He never hit the kid and probably wouldn’t have done so. I think Jolie wanted out, started planting seeds in the kids about abuse and took advantage of the next situation to create a false narrative which by that time, made the kids afraid of him.

That’s what some tabloids reported. That she wanted to leave him and get custody of the kids. She started alienating him from the children and picking fights with him. Even her so called “injuries” that she reported to the FBI were from Brad defending himself from her attack after she put him into a chokehold. She attacked him, but acts as if she is a victim of abuse.

All the allegations she has made haven’t been bought by any of the law enforcement agencies she called to investigate him or the family law judge. He’s not someone who is a danger to the kids. She is nuts and resents him and wants the kids to herself. I always knew she saw those kids as hers and wouldn’t let him be near him if they ever split. I figured she would create some kind of allegations in order to get custody. She’s someone who should have only ever adopted and been a single parent. She has no ability to co-parent at all and never let Brad have a say in the kids upbringing.

She didn't make Brad be alcoholic. He said he pushed the drinking as far as he could. He wasn't safe around the kids. She probably should've left sooner.

Brad did drug testing with CPS. He went to AA and got sober. Just because someone was an alcoholic once doesn’t mean they are cut out of their kids lives forever. He didn’t present any danger to the children after he got clean and Jolie still fought to deny him custody of his children. I think she’s an evil woman who purposely alienated a father from his children. Just because she was done with him doesn’t mean her children didn’t need a father in their lives. But she only wanted him to pay her bills while denying him a relationship with his kids.

Naive or ignorant PP? You have obviously never experienced an abusive alcoholic or drug induced parent. Goody to you. The oldest two kids were approximately 16 and 14 when Pitt allegedly completed his twelve-step program. They were old enough to form their own opinions and from their own experiences with Pitt they did not want to be around him. At eleven-years of age, I knew that my father was a POS and I did not want a relationship of his convenience. I don't know why so many posters think children cannot formulate independent thoughts and opinions of their own.

And if your mother was as crazy as Jolie, did you also want nothing to do with her? Or do kids not think this about their crazy mothers?

Seems like you lack basic reading comprehension.

My point was that your mother was not crazy - so however you feel about your parents, you cannot imagine how these children feel about their parents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Majority have a favorable opinion of Brad Pitt, even after learning about Angelina’s abuse claims

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-lawsuit-claims-babylon-1235253604/

Wonder why there was no poll asking what people thought of Jolie What her peers think of her was loud and clear, when Brad Pitt got an Oscar and standing ovations. The whole town knows she’s nuts and bad news.

AND? The whole town knew Weinstein was a rapist and he continued to win awards as well. Trump is an admitted grab them by the pussy sexual deviant and 80,000,000 people voted him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just saw an article that their youngest daughter (Vivienne) has dropped “Pitt” from her last name. She’s 15. My assessment (aka total speculation) is:

Brad Pitt was a terrible dad. Uninterested in his kids, self absorbed, abusive when drunk. At the same time, for a 15 year old to drop her dad’s name - knowing it will make news and be messy - she must really hate him. In a way that maybe a bitter ex wife would encourage. Dropping “Pitt” in such a public way seems calculated and vindictive and not something most 15 year olds do. It seems like something a kid wouldn’t do without a parent egging them on. So team neither parent - hope these kids have some healthy role models in their life beyond Brad and Angie.

Do you know what would be the ultimate burn to Jolie and those kids she has turned against him? If he had another family with his new girlfriend and he showed the world that he’s a good dad and Jolie is the problem/parental alienator. And then he cut those kids out of his will and left everything to his new family. That would really burn Jolie, seeing as she is seemingly broke and desperately in need of money.

You can have as negative opinion of him as you wish but he hasn't shown himself to be vindictive or to hate his children or treat them badly, apart from the plane incident. There's no reason to think that he would cut off his children like you are hoping.

Apart from the time he got drunk and appears to have had a physical altercation with one of them…


The apart is doing a lot of work in that thought

If you read the FBI report, Jolie “thought” he was going to hit a kid and she jumped on his back. He never hit the kid and probably wouldn’t have done so. I think Jolie wanted out, started planting seeds in the kids about abuse and took advantage of the next situation to create a false narrative which by that time, made the kids afraid of him.

That’s what some tabloids reported. That she wanted to leave him and get custody of the kids. She started alienating him from the children and picking fights with him. Even her so called “injuries” that she reported to the FBI were from Brad defending himself from her attack after she put him into a chokehold. She attacked him, but acts as if she is a victim of abuse.

All the allegations she has made haven’t been bought by any of the law enforcement agencies she called to investigate him or the family law judge. He’s not someone who is a danger to the kids. She is nuts and resents him and wants the kids to herself. I always knew she saw those kids as hers and wouldn’t let him be near him if they ever split. I figured she would create some kind of allegations in order to get custody. She’s someone who should have only ever adopted and been a single parent. She has no ability to co-parent at all and never let Brad have a say in the kids upbringing.

She didn't make Brad be alcoholic. He said he pushed the drinking as far as he could. He wasn't safe around the kids. She probably should've left sooner.

Brad did drug testing with CPS. He went to AA and got sober. Just because someone was an alcoholic once doesn’t mean they are cut out of their kids lives forever. He didn’t present any danger to the children after he got clean and Jolie still fought to deny him custody of his children. I think she’s an evil woman who purposely alienated a father from his children. Just because she was done with him doesn’t mean her children didn’t need a father in their lives. But she only wanted him to pay her bills while denying him a relationship with his kids.

Naive or ignorant PP? You have obviously never experienced an abusive alcoholic or drug induced parent. Goody to you. The oldest two kids were approximately 16 and 14 when Pitt allegedly completed his twelve-step program. They were old enough to form their own opinions and from their own experiences with Pitt they did not want to be around him. At eleven-years of age, I knew that my father was a POS and I did not want a relationship of his convenience. I don't know why so many posters think children cannot formulate independent thoughts and opinions of their own.

THis isn't about you. Stop projecting.

Gosh, you’re intentionally stupid right, because nobody could be as dense as you’re coming across in your post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just saw an article that their youngest daughter (Vivienne) has dropped “Pitt” from her last name. She’s 15. My assessment (aka total speculation) is:

Brad Pitt was a terrible dad. Uninterested in his kids, self absorbed, abusive when drunk. At the same time, for a 15 year old to drop her dad’s name - knowing it will make news and be messy - she must really hate him. In a way that maybe a bitter ex wife would encourage. Dropping “Pitt” in such a public way seems calculated and vindictive and not something most 15 year olds do. It seems like something a kid wouldn’t do without a parent egging them on. So team neither parent - hope these kids have some healthy role models in their life beyond Brad and Angie.

Do you know what would be the ultimate burn to Jolie and those kids she has turned against him? If he had another family with his new girlfriend and he showed the world that he’s a good dad and Jolie is the problem/parental alienator. And then he cut those kids out of his will and left everything to his new family. That would really burn Jolie, seeing as she is seemingly broke and desperately in need of money.

You can have as negative opinion of him as you wish but he hasn't shown himself to be vindictive or to hate his children or treat them badly, apart from the plane incident. There's no reason to think that he would cut off his children like you are hoping.

Apart from the time he got drunk and appears to have had a physical altercation with one of them…


The apart is doing a lot of work in that thought

If you read the FBI report, Jolie “thought” he was going to hit a kid and she jumped on his back. He never hit the kid and probably wouldn’t have done so. I think Jolie wanted out, started planting seeds in the kids about abuse and took advantage of the next situation to create a false narrative which by that time, made the kids afraid of him.

That’s what some tabloids reported. That she wanted to leave him and get custody of the kids. She started alienating him from the children and picking fights with him. Even her so called “injuries” that she reported to the FBI were from Brad defending himself from her attack after she put him into a chokehold. She attacked him, but acts as if she is a victim of abuse.

All the allegations she has made haven’t been bought by any of the law enforcement agencies she called to investigate him or the family law judge. He’s not someone who is a danger to the kids. She is nuts and resents him and wants the kids to herself. I always knew she saw those kids as hers and wouldn’t let him be near him if they ever split. I figured she would create some kind of allegations in order to get custody. She’s someone who should have only ever adopted and been a single parent. She has no ability to co-parent at all and never let Brad have a say in the kids upbringing.

She didn't make Brad be alcoholic. He said he pushed the drinking as far as he could. He wasn't safe around the kids. She probably should've left sooner.

Brad did drug testing with CPS. He went to AA and got sober. Just because someone was an alcoholic once doesn’t mean they are cut out of their kids lives forever. He didn’t present any danger to the children after he got clean and Jolie still fought to deny him custody of his children. I think she’s an evil woman who purposely alienated a father from his children. Just because she was done with him doesn’t mean her children didn’t need a father in their lives. But she only wanted him to pay her bills while denying him a relationship with his kids.

He's still drinking. People who had lunch with him in Italy said he was. He refused to give the kids their own parenting plans even though the boys were about to be 18. His fault. He could have had time with the other kids.

Jolie looks like she still does heroin and has a severe eating disorder. There is no way she is clean.

Jolie fought against him getting any custody. She could have allowed him time with the children without any custody order but refused. The family law judge listened to all of her allegations and determined her claims were not credible. He gave Brad 50/50 custody before Jolie went on a warpath to get the judge disqualified because she threw a temper tantrum (as usual) when she didn’t get what she wanted. She is throwing the same temper tantrum because the judge in the winery case allowed the lawsuit against her to continue.

If Angelina was on heroin he would've said it. You just coming up with wild theories because you don't want accept he was a violent drunk.

Your idol, Jolie, had low points in her life. She was in a mental institution. She was on every drug known to man. She was a cutter. Why is she allowed to turn her life around and be a mother to children, yet Brad is not allowed the same chance to turn his life around and be a father to his children.

Better question is why was she allowed to adopt a these kids given this.

They were international adoptions, which are now banned. And even at the time, at least one of the adoptions was sketchy.

At least two of the children Jolie bought had mothers. She could have given the birth mothers the money to raise their children, but she wanted the children as accessories for her rainbow tribe.

Wow. So I guess you’re against adoptions right PP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just saw an article that their youngest daughter (Vivienne) has dropped “Pitt” from her last name. She’s 15. My assessment (aka total speculation) is:

Brad Pitt was a terrible dad. Uninterested in his kids, self absorbed, abusive when drunk. At the same time, for a 15 year old to drop her dad’s name - knowing it will make news and be messy - she must really hate him. In a way that maybe a bitter ex wife would encourage. Dropping “Pitt” in such a public way seems calculated and vindictive and not something most 15 year olds do. It seems like something a kid wouldn’t do without a parent egging them on. So team neither parent - hope these kids have some healthy role models in their life beyond Brad and Angie.

Do you know what would be the ultimate burn to Jolie and those kids she has turned against him? If he had another family with his new girlfriend and he showed the world that he’s a good dad and Jolie is the problem/parental alienator. And then he cut those kids out of his will and left everything to his new family. That would really burn Jolie, seeing as she is seemingly broke and desperately in need of money.

You can have as negative opinion of him as you wish but he hasn't shown himself to be vindictive or to hate his children or treat them badly, apart from the plane incident. There's no reason to think that he would cut off his children like you are hoping.

Apart from the time he got drunk and appears to have had a physical altercation with one of them…


The apart is doing a lot of work in that thought

If you read the FBI report, Jolie “thought” he was going to hit a kid and she jumped on his back. He never hit the kid and probably wouldn’t have done so. I think Jolie wanted out, started planting seeds in the kids about abuse and took advantage of the next situation to create a false narrative which by that time, made the kids afraid of him.

That’s what some tabloids reported. That she wanted to leave him and get custody of the kids. She started alienating him from the children and picking fights with him. Even her so called “injuries” that she reported to the FBI were from Brad defending himself from her attack after she put him into a chokehold. She attacked him, but acts as if she is a victim of abuse.

All the allegations she has made haven’t been bought by any of the law enforcement agencies she called to investigate him or the family law judge. He’s not someone who is a danger to the kids. She is nuts and resents him and wants the kids to herself. I always knew she saw those kids as hers and wouldn’t let him be near him if they ever split. I figured she would create some kind of allegations in order to get custody. She’s someone who should have only ever adopted and been a single parent. She has no ability to co-parent at all and never let Brad have a say in the kids upbringing.

She didn't make Brad be alcoholic. He said he pushed the drinking as far as he could. He wasn't safe around the kids. She probably should've left sooner.

Brad did drug testing with CPS. He went to AA and got sober. Just because someone was an alcoholic once doesn’t mean they are cut out of their kids lives forever. He didn’t present any danger to the children after he got clean and Jolie still fought to deny him custody of his children. I think she’s an evil woman who purposely alienated a father from his children. Just because she was done with him doesn’t mean her children didn’t need a father in their lives. But she only wanted him to pay her bills while denying him a relationship with his kids.

Naive or ignorant PP? You have obviously never experienced an abusive alcoholic or drug induced parent. Goody to you. The oldest two kids were approximately 16 and 14 when Pitt allegedly completed his twelve-step program. They were old enough to form their own opinions and from their own experiences with Pitt they did not want to be around him. At eleven-years of age, I knew that my father was a POS and I did not want a relationship of his convenience. I don't know why so many posters think children cannot formulate independent thoughts and opinions of their own.

And if your mother was as crazy as Jolie, did you also want nothing to do with her? Or do kids not think this about their crazy mothers?

Seems like you lack basic reading comprehension.

My point was that your mother was not crazy - so however you feel about your parents, you cannot imagine how these children feel about their parents.

That's not what you said at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jolie called the FBI and CPS to make her allegations about Brad. No law enforcement agency thought there was any merit to her allegations. He was cleared and never prosecuted. Yet posters in here insist on slandering his name based on a crazy woman’s allegations that he was cleared of.

She didn’t call. The call was made by flight attendants.

Yeah like the paparazzi just happened to find Jolie and Pitt on a beach in Kenya

She called. She’s the only one still obsessed with the case. She filed a FOIA lawsuit about it and she’s trying to get records from Brad in the discovery phase of the winery lawsuit (that has nothing to do with her abuse allegations, but it’s the only think she can ever talk about).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just saw an article that their youngest daughter (Vivienne) has dropped “Pitt” from her last name. She’s 15. My assessment (aka total speculation) is:

Brad Pitt was a terrible dad. Uninterested in his kids, self absorbed, abusive when drunk. At the same time, for a 15 year old to drop her dad’s name - knowing it will make news and be messy - she must really hate him. In a way that maybe a bitter ex wife would encourage. Dropping “Pitt” in such a public way seems calculated and vindictive and not something most 15 year olds do. It seems like something a kid wouldn’t do without a parent egging them on. So team neither parent - hope these kids have some healthy role models in their life beyond Brad and Angie.

Do you know what would be the ultimate burn to Jolie and those kids she has turned against him? If he had another family with his new girlfriend and he showed the world that he’s a good dad and Jolie is the problem/parental alienator. And then he cut those kids out of his will and left everything to his new family. That would really burn Jolie, seeing as she is seemingly broke and desperately in need of money.

You can have as negative opinion of him as you wish but he hasn't shown himself to be vindictive or to hate his children or treat them badly, apart from the plane incident. There's no reason to think that he would cut off his children like you are hoping.

Apart from the time he got drunk and appears to have had a physical altercation with one of them…


The apart is doing a lot of work in that thought

If you read the FBI report, Jolie “thought” he was going to hit a kid and she jumped on his back. He never hit the kid and probably wouldn’t have done so. I think Jolie wanted out, started planting seeds in the kids about abuse and took advantage of the next situation to create a false narrative which by that time, made the kids afraid of him.

That’s what some tabloids reported. That she wanted to leave him and get custody of the kids. She started alienating him from the children and picking fights with him. Even her so called “injuries” that she reported to the FBI were from Brad defending himself from her attack after she put him into a chokehold. She attacked him, but acts as if she is a victim of abuse.

All the allegations she has made haven’t been bought by any of the law enforcement agencies she called to investigate him or the family law judge. He’s not someone who is a danger to the kids. She is nuts and resents him and wants the kids to herself. I always knew she saw those kids as hers and wouldn’t let him be near him if they ever split. I figured she would create some kind of allegations in order to get custody. She’s someone who should have only ever adopted and been a single parent. She has no ability to co-parent at all and never let Brad have a say in the kids upbringing.

She didn't make Brad be alcoholic. He said he pushed the drinking as far as he could. He wasn't safe around the kids. She probably should've left sooner.

Brad did drug testing with CPS. He went to AA and got sober. Just because someone was an alcoholic once doesn’t mean they are cut out of their kids lives forever. He didn’t present any danger to the children after he got clean and Jolie still fought to deny him custody of his children. I think she’s an evil woman who purposely alienated a father from his children. Just because she was done with him doesn’t mean her children didn’t need a father in their lives. But she only wanted him to pay her bills while denying him a relationship with his kids.

Naive or ignorant PP? You have obviously never experienced an abusive alcoholic or drug induced parent. Goody to you. The oldest two kids were approximately 16 and 14 when Pitt allegedly completed his twelve-step program. They were old enough to form their own opinions and from their own experiences with Pitt they did not want to be around him. At eleven-years of age, I knew that my father was a POS and I did not want a relationship of his convenience. I don't know why so many posters think children cannot formulate independent thoughts and opinions of their own.

THis isn't about you. Stop projecting.

Gosh, you’re intentionally stupid right, because nobody could be as dense as you’re coming across in your post.

It's gotta be the same person. I have had to read their posts several times to understand the connections their attempting to make.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jolie called the FBI and CPS to make her allegations about Brad. No law enforcement agency thought there was any merit to her allegations. He was cleared and never prosecuted. Yet posters in here insist on slandering his name based on a crazy woman’s allegations that he was cleared of.

She didn’t call. The call was made by flight attendants.

Yeah like the paparazzi just happened to find Jolie and Pitt on a beach in Kenya

She called. She’s the only one still obsessed with the case. She filed a FOIA lawsuit about it and she’s trying to get records from Brad in the discovery phase of the winery lawsuit (that has nothing to do with her abuse allegations, but it’s the only think she can ever talk about).

She actually filled her first FOIA back in 2016. And her calling the paps has no connection to attendants stepping in like they should. Again wild connections.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I bet they’ve spent millions on attorney fees.

My guess is she’s done a bang up job alienating those children from him, and at the same time he was a terrible dad and bad partner. Poor kids, they are pawns. Hope she grows up soon.

Sounds like you recognize that there’s hope she could change, but he’s a lost cause.

DP. He was blocked from parenting his children when married and blocked from parenting his children after the divorce started.

As a father, he was a lost cause from the beginning - because Angelina Jolie prevented him from it

Jolie was known to let the children run wild and never let Brad discipline or provide any structure/stability for the children.

Remember when she was married to BBT, she adopted Maddox even though BBT didn’t want more children. And supposedly Brad didn’t want to adopt Pax, but she adopted him anyway. Jolie just does whatever she wants. She was never going to let a father be in her kids lives or have any say in their lives. She should have stayed a single mother since she can’t co-parent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just saw an article that their youngest daughter (Vivienne) has dropped “Pitt” from her last name. She’s 15. My assessment (aka total speculation) is:

Brad Pitt was a terrible dad. Uninterested in his kids, self absorbed, abusive when drunk. At the same time, for a 15 year old to drop her dad’s name - knowing it will make news and be messy - she must really hate him. In a way that maybe a bitter ex wife would encourage. Dropping “Pitt” in such a public way seems calculated and vindictive and not something most 15 year olds do. It seems like something a kid wouldn’t do without a parent egging them on. So team neither parent - hope these kids have some healthy role models in their life beyond Brad and Angie.

Do you know what would be the ultimate burn to Jolie and those kids she has turned against him? If he had another family with his new girlfriend and he showed the world that he’s a good dad and Jolie is the problem/parental alienator. And then he cut those kids out of his will and left everything to his new family. That would really burn Jolie, seeing as she is seemingly broke and desperately in need of money.

You can have as negative opinion of him as you wish but he hasn't shown himself to be vindictive or to hate his children or treat them badly, apart from the plane incident. There's no reason to think that he would cut off his children like you are hoping.

Apart from the time he got drunk and appears to have had a physical altercation with one of them…


The apart is doing a lot of work in that thought

If you read the FBI report, Jolie “thought” he was going to hit a kid and she jumped on his back. He never hit the kid and probably wouldn’t have done so. I think Jolie wanted out, started planting seeds in the kids about abuse and took advantage of the next situation to create a false narrative which by that time, made the kids afraid of him.

That’s what some tabloids reported. That she wanted to leave him and get custody of the kids. She started alienating him from the children and picking fights with him. Even her so called “injuries” that she reported to the FBI were from Brad defending himself from her attack after she put him into a chokehold. She attacked him, but acts as if she is a victim of abuse.

All the allegations she has made haven’t been bought by any of the law enforcement agencies she called to investigate him or the family law judge. He’s not someone who is a danger to the kids. She is nuts and resents him and wants the kids to herself. I always knew she saw those kids as hers and wouldn’t let him be near him if they ever split. I figured she would create some kind of allegations in order to get custody. She’s someone who should have only ever adopted and been a single parent. She has no ability to co-parent at all and never let Brad have a say in the kids upbringing.

She didn't make Brad be alcoholic. He said he pushed the drinking as far as he could. He wasn't safe around the kids. She probably should've left sooner.

Brad did drug testing with CPS. He went to AA and got sober. Just because someone was an alcoholic once doesn’t mean they are cut out of their kids lives forever. He didn’t present any danger to the children after he got clean and Jolie still fought to deny him custody of his children. I think she’s an evil woman who purposely alienated a father from his children. Just because she was done with him doesn’t mean her children didn’t need a father in their lives. But she only wanted him to pay her bills while denying him a relationship with his kids.

He's still drinking. People who had lunch with him in Italy said he was. He refused to give the kids their own parenting plans even though the boys were about to be 18. His fault. He could have had time with the other kids.

Jolie looks like she still does heroin and has a severe eating disorder. There is no way she is clean.

Jolie fought against him getting any custody. She could have allowed him time with the children without any custody order but refused. The family law judge listened to all of her allegations and determined her claims were not credible. He gave Brad 50/50 custody before Jolie went on a warpath to get the judge disqualified because she threw a temper tantrum (as usual) when she didn’t get what she wanted. She is throwing the same temper tantrum because the judge in the winery case allowed the lawsuit against her to continue.

If Angelina was on heroin he would've said it. You just coming up with wild theories because you don't want accept he was a violent drunk.

Your idol, Jolie, had low points in her life. She was in a mental institution. She was on every drug known to man. She was a cutter. Why is she allowed to turn her life around and be a mother to children, yet Brad is not allowed the same chance to turn his life around and be a father to his children.

Better question is why was she allowed to adopt a these kids given this.

They were international adoptions, which are now banned. And even at the time, at least one of the adoptions was sketchy.

At least two of the children Jolie bought had mothers. She could have given the birth mothers the money to raise their children, but she wanted the children as accessories for her rainbow tribe.

Wow. So I guess you’re against adoptions right PP.

DP. Against international adoptions, yes. And they are now banned, for this reason.