Surprise. Republican governor helps the billionaire with the tax cut designed to help poor people. I'm open to good-faith arguments about how this might actually be a good idea. Good-faith only, please - and "improving the state economy helps the poor" isn't specific enough. Did we really need to give this windfall benefit to a billionaire? |
|
Yeah, that's pretty messed up
But under armour is doing a lot of good for Baltimore and they are building a new neighborhood in a totally under used part of the city |
But who will benefit from the building of the new neighborhood? And since he will make a lot of money from the development, why does he need public funds to do it? |
Windfall tax cut. And WE are the ones paying for it. Taxpayers pay for corporate welfare. Is Kevin Plank one of the majority of billionaires that quietly funds rightwing causes? Or is he one of the rare liberal/centrist billionaires? |
|
The worrying part about this is how Hogan seems to have personally steered the tax cut to the billionaire.
Shrug. Republicans. |
UnderArmour can do that without public money resulting from 1. technical mapping issues 2. the governor's willingness to disregard the purpose of the program |
| My husband works for the state and I can guarantee you that there are so many financial types of shenanigans going on with the governor that we don’t know about and I’m sure will increasingly come out with time. Hogan works for his buddies and billionaires, not for the people of Maryland. |
| I think everyone knew that the Opportunity Zones would be boondoggles. |
Really. I'm sure. |