Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm curious about how MAGA is handling the information about Trump raping a 13 year old (and worse). Do any of you read MAGA forums or get MAGA SM posts? I just wonder how the information is being received.

Story:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html

But DailyMail.com has learned that the real reason the suit was dropped is because the claims were simply NOT true.

The woman first sued Trump and Jeffrey Epstein under the name Katie Johnson - a name we know not to be her real identity - on April 26 in California federal court and filed an amended complaint in New York federal court in October, claiming she was subject to rape, criminal sexual acts, assault, battery and false imprisonment.

The court papers offered no corroborative evidence that her claims were true.

News that the allegations were dropped dismayed Hillary supporters who had hoped the claims would be the knock out blow for Trump's election campaign - already rocked in recent weeks by a string of sex assault claims.

Thousands of loyal Hillary followers had opened a discussion about the rape claims on Twitter and other social media networks hoping to damage Trump's push for the White House.

The Huffington Post jumped on the bandwagon of anti-Trump sentiment after she made her claims, asking: 'Donald Trump Is Accused Of Raping A 13-Year-Old. Why Haven't The Media Covered It?'

But DailyMail.com has been told that elements of what Johnson had claimed crumbled at the last minute.

Her claims can today be exposed as untruthful, the key fact being that Donald Trump was not involved whatsoever.

A source with knowledge of the controversial case told DailyMail.com: 'Katie Johnson's account had been believable and compelling right up until the last minute.

'But new information emerged that suggested she had not been telling the truth.

'Ultimately it was discovered that Donald Trump's name had been inserted into this, he was not involved whatsoever. After that she had no credibility.'

The revelation slaps down any suggestion that Johnson dropped the case thanks to a secret financial settlement with Trump, as has been speculated on social media.

It also clears Trump of any hint of wrong doing in association with the lawsuit.

Uh huh.

Sure.

I’m sure that all of the kid rape accusations against Trump are just coincidence.

GTFO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm curious about how MAGA is handling the information about Trump raping a 13 year old (and worse). Do any of you read MAGA forums or get MAGA SM posts? I just wonder how the information is being received.

Story:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html

But DailyMail.com has learned that the real reason the suit was dropped is because the claims were simply NOT true.

The woman first sued Trump and Jeffrey Epstein under the name Katie Johnson - a name we know not to be her real identity - on April 26 in California federal court and filed an amended complaint in New York federal court in October, claiming she was subject to rape, criminal sexual acts, assault, battery and false imprisonment.

The court papers offered no corroborative evidence that her claims were true.

News that the allegations were dropped dismayed Hillary supporters who had hoped the claims would be the knock out blow for Trump's election campaign - already rocked in recent weeks by a string of sex assault claims.

Thousands of loyal Hillary followers had opened a discussion about the rape claims on Twitter and other social media networks hoping to damage Trump's push for the White House.

The Huffington Post jumped on the bandwagon of anti-Trump sentiment after she made her claims, asking: 'Donald Trump Is Accused Of Raping A 13-Year-Old. Why Haven't The Media Covered It?'

But DailyMail.com has been told that elements of what Johnson had claimed crumbled at the last minute.

Her claims can today be exposed as untruthful, the key fact being that Donald Trump was not involved whatsoever.

A source with knowledge of the controversial case told DailyMail.com: 'Katie Johnson's account had been believable and compelling right up until the last minute.

'But new information emerged that suggested she had not been telling the truth.

'Ultimately it was discovered that Donald Trump's name had been inserted into this, he was not involved whatsoever. After that she had no credibility.'

The revelation slaps down any suggestion that Johnson dropped the case thanks to a secret financial settlement with Trump, as has been speculated on social media.

It also clears Trump of any hint of wrong doing in association with the lawsuit.

Not true, you pedophile enabler.

I guess it’s just coincidence that Trump sues everyone in the known universe that so much as looks at him funny, but he never even thinks about it when it comes to Epstein.

Why?

Because he is terrified of testifying and discovery.

[Anonymous]

It stands to reason that not all the allegations will be true.

Please focus on the stuff that has at least some corroboration.

[Anonymous]

The man who directed the new “MELANIA” movie is also in the Epstein files holding what looks to be an underaged girl.

[Anonymous]

I have no doubt there may be some outlandish claims. It's also possible that sexual abuse coupled with mental health vulnerabilities can lead to distorted recall. I've known people with crazy stories that I'm pretty sure didn't happen they way they said, but who have clearly experienced extraordinarily difficult childhoods and have developed mental health conditions (treated or not), and I know people with crazy stories I've been able to corroborate.

From what I recall, FBI never was able to interview "Katie Johnson."

What astonishes me is the depth of sex addiction or whatever it is some of these powerful people fall into and just how disgusting and gross they can be. Even when it doesn't involve underage girls. But also the manipulation of them, and the money involved suggests to me extortion has to have been part of Epstein's wealth, and then conversations such as with Bannon reveling in his puppet master persona.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The man who directed the new “MELANIA” movie is also in the Epstein files holding what looks to be an underaged girl.

He had so many sexual abuse allegations an after MeToo that no one would hire him. Trump’s favorite type of employee!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01615544.pdf

"Ivanka knows he's a dumb f*ck"...

you guys must read this one

WHAT ON EARTH???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm curious about how MAGA is handling the information about Trump raping a 13 year old (and worse). Do any of you read MAGA forums or get MAGA SM posts? I just wonder how the information is being received.

Story:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html

But DailyMail.com has learned that the real reason the suit was dropped is because the claims were simply NOT true.

The woman first sued Trump and Jeffrey Epstein under the name Katie Johnson - a name we know not to be her real identity - on April 26 in California federal court and filed an amended complaint in New York federal court in October, claiming she was subject to rape, criminal sexual acts, assault, battery and false imprisonment.

The court papers offered no corroborative evidence that her claims were true.

News that the allegations were dropped dismayed Hillary supporters who had hoped the claims would be the knock out blow for Trump's election campaign - already rocked in recent weeks by a string of sex assault claims.

Thousands of loyal Hillary followers had opened a discussion about the rape claims on Twitter and other social media networks hoping to damage Trump's push for the White House.

The Huffington Post jumped on the bandwagon of anti-Trump sentiment after she made her claims, asking: 'Donald Trump Is Accused Of Raping A 13-Year-Old. Why Haven't The Media Covered It?'

But DailyMail.com has been told that elements of what Johnson had claimed crumbled at the last minute.

Her claims can today be exposed as untruthful, the key fact being that Donald Trump was not involved whatsoever.

A source with knowledge of the controversial case told DailyMail.com: 'Katie Johnson's account had been believable and compelling right up until the last minute.

'But new information emerged that suggested she had not been telling the truth.

'Ultimately it was discovered that Donald Trump's name had been inserted into this, he was not involved whatsoever. After that she had no credibility.'

The revelation slaps down any suggestion that Johnson dropped the case thanks to a secret financial settlement with Trump, as has been speculated on social media.

It also clears Trump of any hint of wrong doing in association with the lawsuit.

This article uses a lot of smoke and mirrors to cover up the fact that it doesn’t give any actual facts. It just keeps repeats that facts of some kind exist…

Meanwhile, I read a detailed analysis of Katie Johnson’s allegations on Kate Manne’s Substack a few months back, and the allegations all fit with other known details about Trump. Pretty sure not all of those details were public knowledge at the time Johnson made her statement, but I don’t remember exactly how the timeline worked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm curious about how MAGA is handling the information about Trump raping a 13 year old (and worse). Do any of you read MAGA forums or get MAGA SM posts? I just wonder how the information is being received.

Story:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html

But DailyMail.com has learned that the real reason the suit was dropped is because the claims were simply NOT true.

The woman first sued Trump and Jeffrey Epstein under the name Katie Johnson - a name we know not to be her real identity - on April 26 in California federal court and filed an amended complaint in New York federal court in October, claiming she was subject to rape, criminal sexual acts, assault, battery and false imprisonment.

The court papers offered no corroborative evidence that her claims were true.

News that the allegations were dropped dismayed Hillary supporters who had hoped the claims would be the knock out blow for Trump's election campaign - already rocked in recent weeks by a string of sex assault claims.

Thousands of loyal Hillary followers had opened a discussion about the rape claims on Twitter and other social media networks hoping to damage Trump's push for the White House.

The Huffington Post jumped on the bandwagon of anti-Trump sentiment after she made her claims, asking: 'Donald Trump Is Accused Of Raping A 13-Year-Old. Why Haven't The Media Covered It?'

But DailyMail.com has been told that elements of what Johnson had claimed crumbled at the last minute.

Her claims can today be exposed as untruthful, the key fact being that Donald Trump was not involved whatsoever.

A source with knowledge of the controversial case told DailyMail.com: 'Katie Johnson's account had been believable and compelling right up until the last minute.

'But new information emerged that suggested she had not been telling the truth.

'Ultimately it was discovered that Donald Trump's name had been inserted into this, he was not involved whatsoever. After that she had no credibility.'

The revelation slaps down any suggestion that Johnson dropped the case thanks to a secret financial settlement with Trump, as has been speculated on social media.

It also clears Trump of any hint of wrong doing in association with the lawsuit.

Oh now you believe one anonymous source? In the Daily Fail? Hilarious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The man who directed the new “MELANIA” movie is also in the Epstein files holding what looks to be an underaged girl.

Be Best.

[Anonymous]

From:
Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 12:55 PM
To: Jeffrey Epstein

I simply can not believe this victory..
No one called it, we all thought she'd win
You must be happy tho
I remember flying back with Donald on his plane the first weekend I went to v=sit you in Florida was the weekend he
met Melania and he kept on coming out=of the bedroom saying ' wow what a hot piece of ass'
Nuts. Anyway, hope you're enjoying Saudi

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

It stands to reason that not all the allegations will be true.

Please focus on the stuff that has at least some corroboration.

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00147661.pdf

Good example of stuff not to take seriously
Thanks M, I didn't realize Bush raped him too. Ok.
SSAFBI New York
On Aug 28, 2019 12:43 PM, wrote:
Id like to add a few other points disclosed by the purported victim:
While on this yacht he witnessed African American males having sex with white blonde females, all of whom
were bleeding during intercourse.
He was a victim of a type of ritualistic sacrifice in which his feet were cut with a scimitar but left no scarring.
On the yacht he witnessed babies being dismembered, their intestines removed, and individuals eating the
feces from these intestines.
He was also raped by George Bush 1.
Victim disclosed he was escorted to the FBI building by Michael Moore who is the creator of "True Pundit", described
by multiple online sources as a conspiracy driven news website that attempts to paint the FBI in a bad light. Moore has
a criminal record as a result of an FBI Investigation (Copyright Infringement).
Let me know if you want to discuss the former FBI Agent that called this into the head office.

(there's more, but the agent who spoke with the man believed he was not intoxicated but mentally unbalanced and recommended no further investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The man who directed the new “MELANIA” movie is also in the Epstein files holding what looks to be an underaged girl.

After claiming he’d never met Epstein.

[Anonymous]

Why do so many of the emails mock Christian “goys” and “goyem”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The man who directed the new “MELANIA” movie is also in the Epstein files holding what looks to be an underaged girl.

Be Best.

Yup, here he is - Brett Ratner, the director of the "Melania" movie.