Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Blake's texts come across as flirty, and I don't know if that's genuine interest or an artifact of her younger self (who was known to have a string of affairs with people she played opposite). She may just be caught in a dynamic. But her texts were flirty. |
Agree. They clearly got along at some point, you can go back to his Instagram when they first met around December 2022, January 2023 and she was playfully commenting on his posts. They were buddies at the least - she hooked him up with Don the very famous trainer and I don’t believe she would’ve invited him to her apartment with Taylor or on her private jet if they weren’t at least friends at the start. I also think she had extreme insecurity about her body at that time that didn’t help her perception of things. But I don’t think Justin should be blamed for that. He was nothing but respectful. What I can’t get out of my mind when I think of this situation is how she wanted to delay the body scenes and she was insecure, immediately after that Ryan sent that weird introduction text and asked Justin if they can basically reschedule the whole movie so that they could be with their family or something weird. I think he got in her head with the whole “an acting role is like an athlete, and this is your responsibility to get in shape” and got to her about how she was not ready to do this movie postpartum. I think he’s incredibly controlling and I think it’s quite clear from his social media that he has a history of being cruel to her. All in good fun right, ha ha. I don’t find it funny. I think Ryan is behind so much of this. |
Then what the hell are you doing on here? This is not your lawsuit. Are you being paid or is this just 24x7 escapism for you? Why are you so fixed to this thread? At least I have a reason. Watch where you throw that stone. |
| DP. lol have you ever met a lawyer? |
You should listen to the beyond the blinds episode on Jackman. His sham marriage was one of the biggest open secrets in Hollywood. I’m not as caught up on the Clooney stuff and haven’t read the other thread, but know there have been rumors. Open marriages are more common than people think. |
You would have to pay me to listen to a gossip podcast. |
No one is throwing stones except you. This is a pretty juice legal conflict between two celebrities. As a lawyer and someone who enjoys Hollywood and BTS content about movie making, this is a very entertaining story to follow. I enjoy it as a distraction from some of the awful things happening in the world right now, and the legal part gives my brain something to puzzle over in a way that straight up celebrity gossip does not. But I don't know these people. I wasn't there. Whatever happens, it won't actually impact me personally at all. And the same is true for you. If you can't avoid personalizing every single thing about this story, it is probably bad for your mental health to be discussing it all the time. A therapist would tell you the same thing. Consider that you are clearly very emotionally upset about comments on this thread. Is this a good reason to get emotionally upset? Is it? Go work out your emotions about being harassed with a licensed therapist. This is not a healthy place for you. It's not an escape or a fun puzzle for you. You have internalized it and made it about yourself which (1) sucks for you, and (2) makes it impossible to have a normal conversation with you on this subject because you will take anything that anyone says as a personal attack when we don't even know you! We can't possibly be attacking you personally because we are total strangers who know nothing about your life. Think about it. |
Yet no one needs to pay you to post on an anonymous blog lol. |
It’s also pretty clear the Priyanka and the Jonas brothers marriage is completely fake. Its one of the worst kept secrets in Hollywood that he is gay. And she completely trashed her reputation in India needed to restart her career in America and wanted a strong foothold. Their wedding was completely ridiculous and just one big commercial. I don’t think normal sane people recognize that there are some people who gravitate toward that industry who are so unhinged. They don’t really give a crap about finding real love or connection or commitment. I really think not all celebrities but some gravitate toward that industry because they are missing something fundamental in them. I don’t believe for a second that sham are that rare. |
|
Moving on, Blake has added a new attorney. Probably for her suit against Jed Wallace.
****** Michael J. Lambert is an associate in the Intellectual Property Practice Group in Haynes Boone’s Austin office. He focuses on media, entertainment, intellectual property, and First Amendment litigation. |
| Just looked at docs and it’s her suit against Wayfarer. |
|
Article with more quotes from both sides' attorneys and new info on the subpoena. Deadline was one of the media outlets that had claimed to have seen it before the Vanzan lawsuit was located, so it's probably credible.
https://deadline.com/2025/04/justin-baldoni-blake-lively-lawsuit-sham-1236372699/#comments We also know that Jones received that Doe subpoena October 1. Naming Lively, Reynolds and the couple’s various companies and entities, the subpoena “concerns, refers, relates and applies to any and all electronic records, data, documents, and communications in Your possession, custody or control collected from a cellular telephone containing the requested information” from December 1, 2022 onward. That material was handed over not long afterwards, and the Vanzan suit was withdrawn December 19, one day before Lively’s Civil Rights Department filing. |
|
Not actually golden did a great post on it.
So many questions still! Why has Freedman seen it yet? Why are nuggets slowly being leaked? Why was it filed as Vanzan and include both Lively and Reynolds? Why does it go back to 2022? |
You can get paid?!?!!! Oh then I have 1000 hours of $ coming! Yay! |
| IIRC that big telecom subpoena that the judge struck down from Team Lively also went back to 2022, so that's clearly a time they believe is relevant. |