New DME master facilities plan released

Anonymous
Here's the link to all the materials

https://dme.dc.gov/MFP2018

Shockingly there is a mismatch between DC's LEAs (DCPS + charters) plans -- building for 122K students when projected growth is 110K.

Anonymous
Did anyone notice the part about re-boundarying earlier than planned?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice the part about re-boundarying earlier than planned?


I thought it was scheduled for 2020 but this report says 2022-23?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Here's the link to all the materials

https://dme.dc.gov/MFP2018

Shockingly there is a mismatch between DC's LEAs (DCPS + charters) plans -- building for 122K students when projected growth is 110K.



it says expected growth by 2027-2028 school year is 122k. So they're planning for the longer-term.
Anonymous
Has the legally required public meeting about this plan already happened? They are supposed to have at least 1.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Has the legally required public meeting about this plan already happened? They are supposed to have at least 1.


There were three: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/dc-public-education-master-facilities-plan-community-meetings-tickets-50642814020
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice the part about re-boundarying earlier than planned?


I thought it was scheduled for 2020 but this report says 2022-23?


No, it was scheduled for 2022-23.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice the part about re-boundarying earlier than planned?


I thought it was scheduled for 2020 but this report says 2022-23?


No, it was scheduled for 2022-23.


Can't happen soon enough IMO but will be satisfied if it really starts in 2022.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice the part about re-boundarying earlier than planned?


I thought it was scheduled for 2020 but this report says 2022-23?


No, it was scheduled for 2022-23.


Can't happen soon enough IMO but will be satisfied if it really starts in 2022.


Out of curiosity, what are you hoping for and what are your suggestions for the review?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice the part about re-boundarying earlier than planned?


I thought it was scheduled for 2020 but this report says 2022-23?


No, it was scheduled for 2022-23.


Can't happen soon enough IMO but will be satisfied if it really starts in 2022.


Out of curiosity, what are you hoping for and what are your suggestions for the review?


Not PP, but I suspect the idea here is to provide some relief from overcrowing in upper NW. Not sure they will want to take their medicine though.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice the part about re-boundarying earlier than planned?


I thought it was scheduled for 2020 but this report says 2022-23?


No, it was scheduled for 2022-23.


Can't happen soon enough IMO but will be satisfied if it really starts in 2022.


Out of curiosity, what are you hoping for and what are your suggestions for the review?


Not PP, but I suspect the idea here is to provide some relief from overcrowing in upper NW. Not sure they will want to take their medicine though.


That’s exactly what I’m thinking. They think kicking out a Bancroft (insert your idea here) will be enough to address overcrowding. Lafayette and Janney are overcrowded as well. One idea is that Lafayette could go to Brightwood (right down Military).
Anonymous
I means one parts of the current zone can go there for elementary.
Anonymous
I means one parts of the current zone can go there for elementary.
Anonymous
Short of an additional high school I do not know what would solve the Wilson pyramid's overcrowding. Their Coolidge proposal is not going to make a dent because it lacks any real attempt to address academic deficiencies. Maybe the Banneker expansion would peel off a few dozen kids.
Anonymous
So according to the utilization grid, the only DC or charter schools at more than 110% capacity for SY 2017-18 were:

110%+ -- Powell, Roosevelt and SWW

95-110% -- Wilson, Janney, Lafayette, Maury, Ross, Eaton, Brent, Oyster-Adams (Adams) - 95-110%

80-95% -- Deal, Oyster-Adams (Oyster), Hearst, Hardy, Shepherd


I can't find Murch or Bancroft on the grid; either because I missed them or perhaps because they were in swing space during 17-18?

Page A-16 https://dme.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/dme/publication/attachments/DC%20Public%20Education%20Master%20Facilities%20Plan%202018.pdf
post reply Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Message Quick Reply
Go to: