Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s still in the files, no matter how many ways he starts. In fact, he is the files.

All of the Democrat agenda is in the files. Project 2029.

Prosecuting pedophiles and other criminals that run the government seems like a good start and an important agenda item.

I just don't think Democrats deserve any policy riders if that is the platform.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s still in the files, no matter how many ways he starts. In fact, he is the files.

All of the Democrat agenda is in the files. Project 2029.

Prosecuting pedophiles and other criminals that run the government seems like a good start and an important agenda item.

I just don't think Democrats deserve any policy riders if that is the platform.

Ok.

[Anonymous]

What is coming in the files must be bad for trump to start a war with Venezuela!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is coming in the files must be bad for trump to start a war with Venezuela!

Yup. Pam Bondi needs to be held accountable and we need to keep demanding FULL RELEASE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is coming in the files must be bad for trump to start a war with Venezuela!

It’s also the Smith testimony.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is coming in the files must be bad for trump to start a war with Venezuela!

My first thought! I assume they will be lost in the move to Ronald Reagan building

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is coming in the files must be bad for trump to start a jwar with Venezuela!

My first thought! I assume they will be lost in the move to Ronald Reagan building

His entire legacy will be as a pedophile and corrupt con man. Nothing will ever change that, ever.

His name will come up in a classroom in 150 years and people will be like, “who?”

“You know, the pedo guy.”

“Oh, yeah!”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New report out: Trump sent teenage Mar-A-Lago masseuses to Epstein's mansion on outcall; girls say they were pressured for sex.

https://www.salon.com/2025/12/31/trump-sent-mar-a-lago-masseuses-on-epstein-house-calls-report/

Interesting that neither you, nor the wildly biased "Salon" mentioned this part of the WSJ report:

"Epstein had an account at the spa where his companion, Ghislaine Maxwell, booked appointments on his behalf.

They came to a halt in 2003, after an 18-year-old beautician returned to the club from a house call to Epstein and reported to managers that he had pressured her for sex, former employees said.

A manager sent Trump a fax relaying the employee’s allegations and urged him to ban Epstein, some of the former employees said. Trump told the manager it was a good letter and said to kick him out."

Here's the ACTUAL news story, from the WSJ.

https://www.wsj.com/us-news/trump-epstein-mar-a-lago-ban-2011dc53?st=RBY3WQ&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

We also know the Epstein shielded girls from Trump.

“She’s not for you.”

Are you going to give him a posthumous gold star?

No, but you want a gold star for shielding all of the Democrats with Epstein ties.

Dems here (and elsewhere) have consistently called for the release of names and prosecution as appropriate, regardless of party. Hell, even Bill Clinton called for the release of everything.

Maybe you want Dems to be as craven and partisan as the GOP, but they aren't. Not in this.

OK so which Democrats were on speed dial with Epstein, and who are their primary challengers then?

You know what help in sorting all these details out? Get the head of your party to release all the files on Epstein. Trump seems to still be blocking that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New report out: Trump sent teenage Mar-A-Lago masseuses to Epstein's mansion on outcall; girls say they were pressured for sex.

https://www.salon.com/2025/12/31/trump-sent-mar-a-lago-masseuses-on-epstein-house-calls-report/

Interesting that neither you, nor the wildly biased "Salon" mentioned this part of the WSJ report:

"Epstein had an account at the spa where his companion, Ghislaine Maxwell, booked appointments on his behalf.

They came to a halt in 2003, after an 18-year-old beautician returned to the club from a house call to Epstein and reported to managers that he had pressured her for sex, former employees said.

A manager sent Trump a fax relaying the employee’s allegations and urged him to ban Epstein, some of the former employees said. Trump told the manager it was a good letter and said to kick him out."

Here's the ACTUAL news story, from the WSJ.

https://www.wsj.com/us-news/trump-epstein-mar-a-lago-ban-2011dc53?st=RBY3WQ&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

We also know the Epstein shielded girls from Trump.

“She’s not for you.”

Are you going to give him a posthumous gold star?

No, but you want a gold star for shielding all of the Democrats with Epstein ties.

Dems here (and elsewhere) have consistently called for the release of names and prosecution as appropriate, regardless of party. Hell, even Bill Clinton called for the release of everything.

Maybe you want Dems to be as craven and partisan as the GOP, but they aren't. Not in this.

OK so which Democrats were on speed dial with Epstein, and who are their primary challengers then?

You know what help in sorting all these details out? Get the head of your party to release all the files on Epstein. Trump seems to still be blocking that.

Yeah, isn’t that funny?

[Anonymous]

BAN CBS

Bari Weiss just cancelled this week's episode of 60 Minutes (yes, it's about the Epstein files)

barbaraj.sobel

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is coming in the files must be bad for trump to start a war with Venezuela!

Yup. Pam Bondi needs to be held accountable and we need to keep demanding FULL RELEASE.

Ro Khanna and Massie keep talking about it but why haven’t they filed yet?

[Anonymous]

The Venezuela attack pulled Epstein temporarily off the front pages, but Epstein is here to stay.
Release all the files NOW!!

[Anonymous]

RELEASE THE COMPLETE EPSTEIN FILES.

[Anonymous]

Tick tock.

Heather Cox Richardson
January 4, 2025

Today was the legal deadline for the Department of Justice to submit to Congress a written justification for any documents from the Epstein files that the department had redacted or withheld. But it seems unlikely the Justice Department met this deadline because it has missed the December 19 deadline for releasing the files themselves. Both of those deadlines were established by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, passed overwhelmingly by Congress on

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tick tock.

Heather Cox Richardson
January 4, 2025

Today was the legal deadline for the Department of Justice to submit to Congress a written justification for any documents from the Epstein files that the department had redacted or withheld. But it seems unlikely the Justice Department met this deadline because it has missed the December 19 deadline for releasing the files themselves. Both of those deadlines were established by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, passed overwhelmingly by Congress on

What does “legal” mean in 2026 America?