Does Stone Ridge admit transgender students?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would the child want to go to an all girls school as a boy anyway?

Lives for confrontation.

They shouldn’t have it both ways. If the person identifies as a boy and we’re all supposed to accept that, than a boys’ school, not a girls’ one, is the proper placement.

This.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would the child want to go to an all girls school as a boy anyway?

Lives for confrontation.

They shouldn’t have it both ways. If the person identifies as a boy and we’re all supposed to accept that, than a boys’ school, not a girls’ one, is the proper placement.

Seems like a common sense question. Sounds like you live in denial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I, for one, would be unhappy if a child assigned male at birth was permitted to share the locker room with my daughter.

Strongly doubt there will be a stampede of trans mtf students applying, if any … this whole thread is likely designed to whip up divisive hysteria …

You don't need a stampede.

Just one.

Well my DD and I could not care less … We are all loved by God … (upcoming science test and English assignments are much more worrisome … even driving on the beltway to school is more worrisome) … in the unlikely scenario that a trans mtf student applies, my DD can take the locket next to hers.

This … melodramatic drama over a hypothetical … folks worry about your DDs mental, physical and spiritual health, their academics, their online activities, hobbies, and not this extremely unlikely situation …

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Well my DD and I could not care less … We are all loved by God … (upcoming science test and English assignments are much more worrisome … even driving on the beltway to school is more worrisome) … in the unlikely scenario that a trans mtf student applies, my DD can take the locket next to hers.

Have you heard of Loudoun County?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Well my DD and I could not care less … We are all loved by God … (upcoming science test and English assignments are much more worrisome … even driving on the beltway to school is more worrisome) … in the unlikely scenario that a trans mtf student applies, my DD can take the locket next to hers.

Have you heard of Loudoun County?

Why are you fear mongering about a risk that is close to zero for SR students ?

1. This entire thread is probably a hoax to stir up controversy. Transgender mtf students are unlikely to choose a Catholic girls school for obvious reasons;

2. That student was already highly troubled (serious mental health problems/ broken family) had a previous sexual assault charge at another school and would never be admitted to SR. Further, he and the victim had been dating and had engaged in consensual activity in bathroom previously, which does not make the assault right but makes it more complicated than media is portraying it.

3. The student was wearing a skirt but did not have school permission to use the girls bathroom.

It was a horrible event but it was about a simplistic trans bathroom issue the way media portrayed it. My heart broke for the victim and her family.


There is much higher risk for SR girls dealing with anxiety and depression, vaping/ substance abuse, eating disorders in quests to be perfect and feeling excluded.

This thread has achieved its original goal of polarizing and dividing opinion. We need to work much harder on building a loving Christian community where our girls can thrive, feel safe, and develop their gifts and privileges to do good in the world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would the child want to go to an all girls school as a boy anyway?

Lives for confrontation.

They shouldn’t have it both ways. If the person identifies as a boy and we’re all supposed to accept that, than a boys’ school, not a girls’ one, is the proper placement.

This. Stone Ridge is transphobic otherwise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Well my DD and I could not care less … We are all loved by God … (upcoming science test and English assignments are much more worrisome … even driving on the beltway to school is more worrisome) … in the unlikely scenario that a trans mtf student applies, my DD can take the locket next to hers.

Have you heard of Loudoun County?

Why are you fear mongering about a risk that is close to zero for SR students ?

1. This entire thread is probably a hoax to stir up controversy. Transgender mtf students are unlikely to choose a Catholic girls school for obvious reasons;

2. That student was already highly troubled (serious mental health problems/ broken family) had a previous sexual assault charge at another school and would never be admitted to SR. Further, he and the victim had been dating and had engaged in consensual activity in bathroom previously, which does not make the assault right but makes it more complicated than media is portraying it.

3. The student was wearing a skirt but did not have school permission to use the girls bathroom.

It was a horrible event but it was about a simplistic trans bathroom issue the way media portrayed it. My heart broke for the victim and her family.


There is much higher risk for SR girls dealing with anxiety and depression, vaping/ substance abuse, eating disorders in quests to be perfect and feeling excluded.

This thread has achieved its original goal of polarizing and dividing opinion. We need to work much harder on building a loving Christian community where our girls can thrive, feel safe, and develop their gifts and privileges to do good in the world.

Why are you fear mongering about a risk that is close to zero for SR students ?

1. This entire thread is probably a hoax to stir up controversy. Transgender mtf students are unlikely to choose a Catholic girls school for obvious reasons;

2. That student was already highly troubled (serious mental health problems/ broken family) had a previous sexual assault charge at another school and would never be admitted to SR. Further, he and the victim had been dating and had engaged in consensual activity in bathroom previously, which does not make the assault right but makes it more complicated than media is portraying it; and

3. The student was wearing a skirt but did not have school permission to use the girls bathroom.

It was a horrible event but it was not about a simplistic trans bathroom issue the way media portrayed it. My heart broke for the victim and her family.


There is much higher risk for SR girls dealing with anxiety and depression, vaping/ substance abuse, eating disorders in quests to be perfect and feeling excluded.

This thread has achieved its original goal of polarizing and dividing opinion. We need to work much harder on building a loving Christian community where our girls can thrive, feel safe, and develop their gifts and privileges to do good in the world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:


There is much higher risk for SR girls dealing with anxiety and depression, vaping/ substance abuse, eating disorders in quests to be perfect and feeling excluded.

This is actually very true. The counselors are clueless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would the child want to go to an all girls school as a boy anyway?

Lives for confrontation.

They shouldn’t have it both ways. If the person identifies as a boy and we’re all supposed to accept that, than a boys’ school, not a girls’ one, is the proper placement.

This

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Well my DD and I could not care less … We are all loved by God … (upcoming science test and English assignments are much more worrisome … even driving on the beltway to school is more worrisome) … in the unlikely scenario that a trans mtf student applies, my DD can take the locket next to hers.

Have you heard of Loudoun County?

Why are you fear mongering about a risk that is close to zero for SR students ?

1. This entire thread is probably a hoax to stir up controversy. Transgender mtf students are unlikely to choose a Catholic girls school for obvious reasons;

2. That student was already highly troubled (serious mental health problems/ broken family) had a previous sexual assault charge at another school and would never be admitted to SR. Further, he and the victim had been dating and had engaged in consensual activity in bathroom previously, which does not make the assault right but makes it more complicated than media is portraying it.

3. The student was wearing a skirt but did not have school permission to use the girls bathroom.

It was a horrible event but it was about a simplistic trans bathroom issue the way media portrayed it. My heart broke for the victim and her family.


There is much higher risk for SR girls dealing with anxiety and depression, vaping/ substance abuse, eating disorders in quests to be perfect and feeling excluded.

This thread has achieved its original goal of polarizing and dividing opinion. We need to work much harder on building a loving Christian community where our girls can thrive, feel safe, and develop their gifts and privileges to do good in the world.

Why are you fear mongering about a risk that is close to zero for SR students ?

1. This entire thread is probably a hoax to stir up controversy. Transgender mtf students are unlikely to choose a Catholic girls school for obvious reasons;

2. That student was already highly troubled (serious mental health problems/ broken family) had a previous sexual assault charge at another school and would never be admitted to SR. Further, he and the victim had been dating and had engaged in consensual activity in bathroom previously, which does not make the assault right but makes it more complicated than media is portraying it; and

3. The student was wearing a skirt but did not have school permission to use the girls bathroom.

It was a horrible event but it was not about a simplistic trans bathroom issue the way media portrayed it. My heart broke for the victim and her family.


There is much higher risk for SR girls dealing with anxiety and depression, vaping/ substance abuse, eating disorders in quests to be perfect and feeling excluded.

This thread has achieved its original goal of polarizing and dividing opinion. We need to work much harder on building a loving Christian community where our girls can thrive, feel safe, and develop their gifts and privileges to do good in the world.

This, especially:

This thread has achieved its original goal of polarizing and dividing opinion. We need to work much harder on building a loving Christian community where our girls can thrive, feel safe, and develop their gifts and privileges to do good in the world.

[Anonymous]

There's nothing stopping you from building a "loving, Christian community", so perhaps stop talking about the fact that you need to "work hard" to do it, and instead do the work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There's nothing stopping you from building a "loving, Christian community", so perhaps stop talking about the fact that you need to "work hard" to do it, and instead do the work.

It starts with not whipping up controversy and fear about close to non existent risks while working on addressing realistic risks which is what we do with DD.

[Anonymous]

It is a Catholic single-sex girls school OP. If you are so affronted + triggered--stop whining + start your own trans school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is a Catholic single-sex girls school OP. If you are so affronted + triggered--stop whining + start your own trans school.

OP is a troll stirring up controversy and division - more likely to be laughing hard rather than affronted …

[Anonymous]

Here’s something I have learned from my daughters in the past year

There’s a lot of peer pressure online to identify as queer or transgender

And it’s very uncool to identify as heterosexual

I’m unfortunately having to have these discussions with my 12 and 13 year old daughters