| My DC is a truly mediocre student but has a high SAT. So far in EA at three targets, two reaches, and one safety. Weirdly, denied or deferred at two additional safeties and one reach. No hooks, no rhyme, no reason. |
Any chance you can share what the targets and reaches are? We are having a really hard time guessing how schools are evaluating this year and results so far are not encouraging. In at safeties, basically. |
Congrats! I know girls who loved several of the schools your daughter now gets to consider. She can't go wrong! |
| Echo the congrats! |
That is one tell tell sign for high income full pay students. |
Thank you for this pp! My DD plays a sport and a musical instrument and that is it. Would you mind listing some of the schools he was admitted to? |
How do you figure? I am going to to guess that most on this board fall into that category. |
+1. I am the other PP asking what schools these are, as we are not seeing these types of results, at least not yet. |
Because wealthy kids test prep. Google and read the NYTimes article on Trinity College. Most colleges rely on tuition for making expenses. When push comes to shove, full-pay with great test scores get into these schools. As the NYT article mentions, however, professors hate this. Generally, low grade, high test score admits don’t enjoy traditional academics. That doesn’t mean they aren’t smart, motivated kids who will do great in “real life,” but they don’t tend to be great class participants. |
I have a kid like that and that if not a true profile for everyone. High SATs with no prep, B+ average with all honors and APs at a tough grading school, a few rough spots over the years tanked enough grades to bring the averages down. This is a school where two wrong on a test is a C -- no do overs, no extra credit. Kids with this profile get into schools because the profile is understood in context and they do extremely well in college, finding it much easier than high school. |
I think there's probably some truth to this. But some schools make it really hard to do well in terms of GPA, but the same kids are able to be successful on the standardized tests. |
And this curriculum would not prepare a student to do well on the SAT/ACT? Is this school private? I suspect that it is. |
|
Both of my kids are strong students and neither of them were aiming for Ivies. Both applied ED to SLACs and got in. For both of them the key was to think hard about the characteristics of the school that mattered to them (size, location, curriculum, vibe), figure out where they could be happy (there's not just one place), and then try to aim accurately in terms of grades/scores/other qualities. The advantage conferred by ED does you no good at all if you aim too high.
In the case of my older kid (HS class of 2018) he had a 4.7/3.9 (weighted/unweighted) and a 1450 on his SATs, with good but not amazing ECs, and got into a NE SLAC with an admit rate in the high teens. He was interested in a place with an open (or nearly open) curriculum and a progressive but not wildly left political climate. He wanted the warmth and community of a small school. My younger kid, who graduates this year, had slightly lower grades and not quite as many APs as her brother. After a zillion cancellations she took the ACT in October and got a 34. Her ECs were ok. She was admitted ED to a NE SLAC with an admit rate of around 30%. She had some of the same priorities as my older kid, but warmth and community were really important to her. The situation this year is particularly crazy for the tippy top schools because everyone has gone test optional. Tons of kids who would not have applied if they had to submit scores are now in the pool, and the admissions officers are (I think) being much more conservative in who they admit early. I think my daughter in particular was lucky that her ED choice was a school that was already test optional and therefore had more experience in evaluating candidates without scores. |
People in private schools are blaming grade deflation, but I think schools are just not as interested in private school kids as in the past. I think there is a certain amount of “discounting” that goes on for kids from privileged backgrounds (unless you’re a development case). I understand why people who have sacrificed to send their kids to private school are frustrated by this, but this has been a trend for a while, and it’s just coming to fruition with test-optional admissions. |
| Mine is applying to large state schools. So far, Accepted at Bama, UNC, UMD, Purdue, and Wisconsin. Deferred from Michigan. Waiting on UVA, Georgia Tech, Berkeley, and Virginia Tech |