NP. There's a lot of stunning natural beauty in the bay area and hiking that is easily accessible in the Bay Area if your friend has a car or if you are able to rent a car that can be done pretty cheaply. It doesn't necessarily need to cost an arm and a leg to take a weekend trip to Monterrey or Half Moon Bay or go hiking in the Redwoods. There's even a ton of gorgeous trails on the peninsula that are easily accessed from Stanford (Rancho San Antonio for example). There's also a ton of backpacking. Taking a trip into SF doesn't need to be super expensive either. The only thing on that list that is expensive are ski trips to Tahoe and games in LA. But it's not like skiing isn't a thing on the East Coast as well. |
| The weather at Stanford is also a lot better. It’s more of a hub for tech as well. |
| all this thread proves is that people on DCUM will argue over anything. Good grief. |
So true. |
Restaurants and clubs in Boston are $$$. The rich students have cars. |
|
Stanford vs. Harvard. The most definitive video dealing with this question:
https://youtu.be/bMM3z3o6BAs |
| Apparently, to avoid the unwashed masses. |
so, the unwashed masses attend Stanford? |
I was the PP, and no driving to LA in a car full of kids and staying at one of our classmates' houses wasn't expensive. Neither were the ski trips, as the Alumni Association owned a camp at Tahoe (not to mention that there were more classmates with houses). I was poor, so didn't go often, but my point is that we were never limited to the gorgeous campus. |
| We’re talking about day-to-day life as an undergrad and why someone might prefer Harvard to Stanford (that was the question asked). One answer was they might prefer a campus that gave them easy access to an activity-rich urban environment. |
In my field Stanford is way more impressive than Harvard. |
Eh, not so much any more. |