You're missing the point. The fact that multiple parents complain in close proximity doesn't mean there's a "coordinated attack." If all the kids in a class go home and relay an incident that raises significant concerns, multiple people might complain at the same time. Parents can't win. If one parent complains, their kid is exaggerating, unreliable or lying. If multiple parents complain, it's an unfounded coordinated attack on a poor teacher. You are trying to silence people. Your post makes me even less confident that school administrators will do the right thing, but if I see something that has a significant negative impact on my kid, the least of my concern is that your or anyone else will think poorly of me or think that I'm somehow involved in a baseless vendetta. |
Many times individual complaints are dismissed as unreliable. Parents join together to make sure they aren't dismissed. If you are going to not respond to valid concerns because you're mad that parents got together to raise their concerns, then you're failing at your job. If there is a valid concern, why would you be mad that parents join forces to voice their concern? You've given your PSA and my response is I'm going to do what I deem best based on the issue at hand. If I think I'm being dismissed with regard to an important issue, then I'll join forces with other parents to be heard. If you choose to let your disdain for parents complaining together interfere with your job, maybe it's time to find a new job that doesn't involve protecting children. |
I have several kids in different schools and I used to work in the public schools. I can probably think of two CLEAR cases were a teacher should have been fired and wasn’t (one was something I saw in a classroom and another was a teacher my kid had for a special as mentioned above) and several other where parents were right to complain. In all cases the teacher in question got at most a warning. |
Or OP is a “forced to retire” adm who operated as mafia. |
The more times op responds, the more I’m convinced she’s a teacher that is receiving many, many, many complaints from angry parents. |
OP - very gently - are you by chance Ms. Applebauer or Mr. Grapepants? |
Accept the truth that administrators are protecting bad teachers because they think mobs of parents are ganging up on them? Yeah, okay. Who sounds crazier - you, or the parents? |
I have seen something similar. Parents were too afraid to come forward individually so it needed to be in a group. At first the parents were attacked ruthlessly. Then apparently someone higher up did some more digging and the end result was the principal was fired. Funny thing, that "coordinated" group of parents was 100% right. |
OP you need counseling. Your post, no matter the caveats about the intended audience, comes across as smug and paranoid. There are no mobs of parents conspiring to run away teachers that they don't like for illegitimate reasons. You have watched too much TV. Your tirade against parents may be based on good intentions, but the messaging is lost because of the tone. |
+1,000 |
I'm sorry you're going through this. |
I don't work in the school system, but I've seen this happen among parents in a class. It's not common, but with two kids going through K-12, I've seen it happen once full-blown and once in a milder way. (I've also seen plenty of parents work out their issues with teacher in reasonable ways--and have had 2 conversations with teachers myself over the years about issues where I disagreed with a policy/approach). The full-blown mob was "weird" -- it was led by a parent and who enlisted one more and then they tried to regularly whip up drama among parents about an event or policy in this teachers class. In this case, it was a teacher that my eldest had who myself and everyone adored, for the second somehow she was "hated" and there was no perceptible change in teaching that I could discern. But the same parent who whipped up the drama there also caused problems between parents, sued the HOA, had the bus stop moved, had a thing against the librarian. So it seemed ridiculous to me and I sent in messages of support for the teacher. But if you weren't a parent who witnessed this trend or weren't that involved in school, she could be very convincing. She was a lawyer and seemed very competent. The fact is that any job where you work with a diverse public you are going to encounter people with personality disorders, mental health issues, or just generally belligerence-- and because schools work with groups of kids and groups of parents over the long term in a really intensive way --these can intersect with weird group patterns that makes it different than just regular work with client. Your response that this doesn't happen seems really naive to me. Sure, it may not happen to you. But you have 1-4 kids over a certain period of time--you don't see the day in, day out of a school with all its students, teachers, parents etc. |
I'm an admin (home on leave) and feel like this post is very, very problematic.
First, parents have every right to ask questions, get information, and raise issues with their teachers! We want that engagement (at least I do) and I view my role as a teacher as much as a partner to the parent's role in their child's education. That said, some teachers are not responsive (ignoring emails requesting information for over a week despite a follow up by the parent) or just don't care for parents putting their noses in their classrooms. Some teachers view their room as their kingdom and get touchy when parents ask questions. It should come as no surprise that more often than not, these are the teachers getting complaints from principals mostly. Second, Principals have to juggle competing issues. First, if I have a competent teacher who isn't responsive, I am going to do my best to coach the teacher to be more responsive. If that doesn't work, I will take on the role of working with parents so long as the teacher is competent otherwise. I struggle to fill positions every year and there is a massive teacher shortage in this area. So, I will often take the devil I know versus the devil I don't. Third, if the teacher is incompetent, this will trigger the long painful process of putting together a file to support non-renewal. It's a ton of work, but if the teacher is not only making more work for me, but is generally also incompetent, I will take on the extra work to get rid of that teacher. Finally, I do think the IEP process for emotionally disturbed children results in a year or two where the child is obviously not in the right environment, the child is causing safety issues that require the teacher to clear her classroom on a regular basis and the child is disrupting instruction to the other children. In those situations, I will do my best to mitigate the impact on all learners including the child with suspected ED (though in 20 years I have seen 100 percent of these kids land in an ED center and thrive eventually). I will assign at least an IA to the classroom. I will often require a SPED teacher to spend the LA and Math blocks in that clasroom, and finally, I will probably grant requests from parents who wish that have their child removed. So, there are valid reasons to raise concerns about your child's classroom. And I do not view multiple complaints as evidence of a mob. I am more discerning than OP. |
We had both 3 and 4 happen to one of our DCs in a single year, and were very grateful the administration handled it as you did. I'm sure we weren't the only parents bubbling up issues. |
NP Here. And I have yet to complain about a teacher my DC has had and we are now in MS. That said, I'm not entirely sure why you think this post, and your tone, is helping your cause. At all. You may want to rethink it before running your mouth further. |