Stock Piling Guns for the Democratic Mid term

[Anonymous]

12:02 Great post. I will say I wouldn’t stereotype who may or may not recall the ride of Paul Revere and the history of Lexington and Concord. I smiled while reading your post recalling all of the fun projects and plays associated with the lesson throughout grammar school. Those were the days.

[Anonymous]

I thought you guys promised me Obama would take away all the guns.

Also, aren't we all supposed to be forced into hijabs by now thanks to the Kenyan Muslim-in-Chief?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought you guys promised me Obama would take away all the guns.

Also, aren't we all supposed to be forced into hijabs by now thanks to the Kenyan Muslim-in-Chief?

Wrong website, Pay-Per-Poster. In 2008 Obama did fail to close the gun show loophole and hoped to get that done his second term. And I don’t know one Republican who believed we were all supposed to be forced in Hijabs by now. What websites do you frequent? Yikes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought you guys promised me Obama would take away all the guns.

Also, aren't we all supposed to be forced into hijabs by now thanks to the Kenyan Muslim-in-Chief?

Wrong website, Pay-Per-Poster. In 2008 Obama did fail to close the gun show loophole and hoped to get that done his second term. And I don’t know one Republican who believed we were all supposed to be forced in Hijabs by now. What websites do you frequent? Yikes.

c'mon. There were several "Obama is a secret Muslim" conspiracy theories over the years.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_religion_conspiracy_theories
https://www.factcheck.org/2017/01/eight-years-of-trolling-obama/

Although I will admit, the dangers of the hijab have only been parroted to my by my aging, Fox News watching parents. Can't seem to find a Brietbart article to back it up, so I will withdraw the accusation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought you guys promised me Obama would take away all the guns.

Also, aren't we all supposed to be forced into hijabs by now thanks to the Kenyan Muslim-in-Chief?

Wrong website, Pay-Per-Poster. In 2008 Obama did fail to close the gun show loophole and hoped to get that done his second term. And I don’t know one Republican who believed we were all supposed to be forced in Hijabs by now. What websites do you frequent? Yikes.

c'mon. There were several "Obama is a secret Muslim" conspiracy theories over the years.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_religion_conspiracy_theories
https://www.factcheck.org/2017/01/eight-years-of-trolling-obama/

Although I will admit, the dangers of the hijab have only been parroted to my by my aging, Fox News watching parents. Can't seem to find a Brietbart article to back it up, so I will withdraw the accusation.

PS, although if you google "Breitbart + hijab" you do get pages and pages of hits about how terrible it is! Weird....

[Anonymous]

Why do you still have these guns? I though Obama was supposed to take them all away during the extended (to you all) time that he had a majority under him?

Fools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually, the Founders were indeed running around the countryside shooting up small animals with the most advanced military rifles available to them.

Then they shot the British when the British tried to take those rifles.


This country was literally created by people who refused to have their guns confiscated.

BS!

You don't remember One if by land, two if by sea? Real Americans studied this stuff in school. Paperwork Americans didn't have this stuff on the citizenship test.

https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-us-history/period-3/apush-the-american-revolution/a/lexington-and-concord

About 700 British Army regulars in Boston, under Lieutenant Colonel Francis Smith, were given secret orders to capture and destroy Colonial military supplies (arms, ammo and gun powder) reportedly stored by the Massachusetts militia at Concord. Through effective intelligence gathering, Patriot leaders had received word weeks before the expedition that their supplies might be at risk and had moved most of them to other locations. On the night before the battle, warning of the British expedition had been rapidly sent from Boston to militias in the area by several riders, including Paul Revere and Samuel Prescott, with information about British plans. The initial mode of the Army's arrival by water was signaled from the Old North Church in Boston to Charlestown using lanterns to communicate "one if by land, two if by sea". (aka the midnight ride)

The first shots were fired just as the sun was rising at Lexington. Eight militiamen were killed, including Ensign Robert Munroe, their third in command.[10] The British suffered only one casualty. The militia were outnumbered and fell back, and the regulars proceeded on to Concord, where they broke apart into companies to search for the supplies. At the North Bridge in Concord, approximately 400 militiamen engaged 100 regulars from three companies of the King's troops at about 11:00 am, resulting in casualties on both sides. The outnumbered regulars fell back from the bridge and rejoined the main body of British forces in Concord.

It's really sad if you don't know this part of our nations history. Then again Common Core requires little education on the subject: http://newbostonpost.com/2016/04/18/to-bring-back-u-s-history-first-repeal-common-core/

Hey, I suggest the Revolutionary War was not about guns. But, if you are heading to war with someone, you, of course, first go after their weapons and supply lines. Doesn't make the war about guns.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought you guys promised me Obama would take away all the guns.

Also, aren't we all supposed to be forced into hijabs by now thanks to the Kenyan Muslim-in-Chief?

Wrong website, Pay-Per-Poster. In 2008 Obama did fail to close the gun show loophole and hoped to get that done his second term. And I don’t know one Republican who believed we were all supposed to be forced in Hijabs by now. What websites do you frequent? Yikes.

c'mon. There were several "Obama is a secret Muslim" conspiracy theories over the years.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_religion_conspiracy_theories
https://www.factcheck.org/2017/01/eight-years-of-trolling-obama/

Although I will admit, the dangers of the hijab have only been parroted to my by my aging, Fox News watching parents. Can't seem to find a Brietbart article to back it up, so I will withdraw the accusation.

PS, although if you google "Breitbart + hijab" you do get pages and pages of hits about how terrible it is! Weird....

Look, I went to Catholic School with nuns who wore a full habit. Religious attire and fashion is ones own perogative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought you guys promised me Obama would take away all the guns.

Also, aren't we all supposed to be forced into hijabs by now thanks to the Kenyan Muslim-in-Chief?

Wrong website, Pay-Per-Poster. In 2008 Obama did fail to close the gun show loophole and hoped to get that done his second term. And I don’t know one Republican who believed we were all supposed to be forced in Hijabs by now. What websites do you frequent? Yikes.

The gun show loophole is absolutely still open. ‘Murica!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/democrats-race-to-prove-who-hates-guns-more-in-northern-virginia-house-primary/2018/05/01/d3ad87a0-4cbb-11e8-b725-92c89fe3ca4c_story.html?utm_term=.de1eb6a7fb5f&wpisrc=nl_buzz&wpmm=1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually, the Founders were indeed running around the countryside shooting up small animals with the most advanced military rifles available to them.

Then they shot the British when the British tried to take those rifles.


This country was literally created by people who refused to have their guns confiscated.

BS!

You don't remember One if by land, two if by sea? Real Americans studied this stuff in school. Paperwork Americans didn't have this stuff on the citizenship test.

https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-us-history/period-3/apush-the-american-revolution/a/lexington-and-concord

About 700 British Army regulars in Boston, under Lieutenant Colonel Francis Smith, were given secret orders to capture and destroy Colonial military supplies (arms, ammo and gun powder) reportedly stored by the Massachusetts militia at Concord. Through effective intelligence gathering, Patriot leaders had received word weeks before the expedition that their supplies might be at risk and had moved most of them to other locations. On the night before the battle, warning of the British expedition had been rapidly sent from Boston to militias in the area by several riders, including Paul Revere and Samuel Prescott, with information about British plans. The initial mode of the Army's arrival by water was signaled from the Old North Church in Boston to Charlestown using lanterns to communicate "one if by land, two if by sea". (aka the midnight ride)

The first shots were fired just as the sun was rising at Lexington. Eight militiamen were killed, including Ensign Robert Munroe, their third in command.[10] The British suffered only one casualty. The militia were outnumbered and fell back, and the regulars proceeded on to Concord, where they broke apart into companies to search for the supplies. At the North Bridge in Concord, approximately 400 militiamen engaged 100 regulars from three companies of the King's troops at about 11:00 am, resulting in casualties on both sides. The outnumbered regulars fell back from the bridge and rejoined the main body of British forces in Concord.

It's really sad if you don't know this part of our nations history. Then again Common Core requires little education on the subject: http://newbostonpost.com/2016/04/18/to-bring-back-u-s-history-first-repeal-common-core/

Hey, I suggest the Revolutionary War was not about guns. But, if you are heading to war with someone, you, of course, first go after their weapons and supply lines. Doesn't make the war about guns.

But the gun grab was the event that kicked it into a shooting war. Tensions were smoldering for the years leading up to the outbreak of the war, but until the British tried to seize the Colonist's weapons, it wasn't a shooting-war.

Remarkably similar to where we are right now as a country, divided ideologically into left/right camps.

If the left ever finds itself truly in power, it needs to keep this lesson in mind and temper it's feverish desires to go after guns. Because that will be the act that starts the next civil war. It happened once, it will happen again. Some Americans simply will not be disarmed. Period. And they'll die (and more importantly, kill) to make that stand.

It's a uniquely American trait, and still runs through perhaps 10-15% of the population. And you will *never* force 30+ million armed people to do something they don't want to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually, the Founders were indeed running around the countryside shooting up small animals with the most advanced military rifles available to them.

Then they shot the British when the British tried to take those rifles.


This country was literally created by people who refused to have their guns confiscated.

BS!

You don't remember One if by land, two if by sea? Real Americans studied this stuff in school. Paperwork Americans didn't have this stuff on the citizenship test.

https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-us-history/period-3/apush-the-american-revolution/a/lexington-and-concord

About 700 British Army regulars in Boston, under Lieutenant Colonel Francis Smith, were given secret orders to capture and destroy Colonial military supplies (arms, ammo and gun powder) reportedly stored by the Massachusetts militia at Concord. Through effective intelligence gathering, Patriot leaders had received word weeks before the expedition that their supplies might be at risk and had moved most of them to other locations. On the night before the battle, warning of the British expedition had been rapidly sent from Boston to militias in the area by several riders, including Paul Revere and Samuel Prescott, with information about British plans. The initial mode of the Army's arrival by water was signaled from the Old North Church in Boston to Charlestown using lanterns to communicate "one if by land, two if by sea". (aka the midnight ride)

The first shots were fired just as the sun was rising at Lexington. Eight militiamen were killed, including Ensign Robert Munroe, their third in command.[10] The British suffered only one casualty. The militia were outnumbered and fell back, and the regulars proceeded on to Concord, where they broke apart into companies to search for the supplies. At the North Bridge in Concord, approximately 400 militiamen engaged 100 regulars from three companies of the King's troops at about 11:00 am, resulting in casualties on both sides. The outnumbered regulars fell back from the bridge and rejoined the main body of British forces in Concord.

It's really sad if you don't know this part of our nations history. Then again Common Core requires little education on the subject: http://newbostonpost.com/2016/04/18/to-bring-back-u-s-history-first-repeal-common-core/

Hey, I suggest the Revolutionary War was not about guns. But, if you are heading to war with someone, you, of course, first go after their weapons and supply lines. Doesn't make the war about guns.

But the gun grab was the event that kicked it into a shooting war. Tensions were smoldering for the years leading up to the outbreak of the war, but until the British tried to seize the Colonist's weapons, it wasn't a shooting-war.

Remarkably similar to where we are right now as a country, divided ideologically into left/right camps.

If the left ever finds itself truly in power, it needs to keep this lesson in mind and temper it's feverish desires to go after guns. Because that will be the act that starts the next civil war. It happened once, it will happen again. Some Americans simply will not be disarmed. Period. And they'll die (and more importantly, kill) to make that stand.

It's a uniquely American trait, and still runs through perhaps 10-15% of the population. And you will *never* force 30+ million armed people to do something they don't want to do.

Yep. Laws for thee, but not for me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many fellow gun owners here. Are you hoarding ammo and rifles on the risks of a democrat mid term comeback?

Is there some other way to construe this than as a threat?

its called hoarding in case something is banned

Because it's TOTALLY going to be banned with Trump as President. He would veto it.

Even when the Democrats had total control, they never banned it. I would call it more irrational fear than anything else. Of course they've been stockpiling since Obama was elected. At some point I would assume they have enough guns and ammunition. Why have 1 gun when you can have two? Why have two when you can have four? Why have four when you can turn your home office into a "gun room"?

Sadly I just can’t trust what Trump is going to do!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually, the Founders were indeed running around the countryside shooting up small animals with the most advanced military rifles available to them.

Then they shot the British when the British tried to take those rifles.


This country was literally created by people who refused to have their guns confiscated.

BS!

You don't remember One if by land, two if by sea? Real Americans studied this stuff in school. Paperwork Americans didn't have this stuff on the citizenship test.

https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-us-history/period-3/apush-the-american-revolution/a/lexington-and-concord

About 700 British Army regulars in Boston, under Lieutenant Colonel Francis Smith, were given secret orders to capture and destroy Colonial military supplies (arms, ammo and gun powder) reportedly stored by the Massachusetts militia at Concord. Through effective intelligence gathering, Patriot leaders had received word weeks before the expedition that their supplies might be at risk and had moved most of them to other locations. On the night before the battle, warning of the British expedition had been rapidly sent from Boston to militias in the area by several riders, including Paul Revere and Samuel Prescott, with information about British plans. The initial mode of the Army's arrival by water was signaled from the Old North Church in Boston to Charlestown using lanterns to communicate "one if by land, two if by sea". (aka the midnight ride)

The first shots were fired just as the sun was rising at Lexington. Eight militiamen were killed, including Ensign Robert Munroe, their third in command.[10] The British suffered only one casualty. The militia were outnumbered and fell back, and the regulars proceeded on to Concord, where they broke apart into companies to search for the supplies. At the North Bridge in Concord, approximately 400 militiamen engaged 100 regulars from three companies of the King's troops at about 11:00 am, resulting in casualties on both sides. The outnumbered regulars fell back from the bridge and rejoined the main body of British forces in Concord.

It's really sad if you don't know this part of our nations history. Then again Common Core requires little education on the subject: http://newbostonpost.com/2016/04/18/to-bring-back-u-s-history-first-repeal-common-core/

Hey, I suggest the Revolutionary War was not about guns. But, if you are heading to war with someone, you, of course, first go after their weapons and supply lines. Doesn't make the war about guns.

But the gun grab was the event that kicked it into a shooting war. Tensions were smoldering for the years leading up to the outbreak of the war, but until the British tried to seize the Colonist's weapons, it wasn't a shooting-war.

Remarkably similar to where we are right now as a country, divided ideologically into left/right camps.

If the left ever finds itself truly in power, it needs to keep this lesson in mind and temper it's feverish desires to go after guns. Because that will be the act that starts the next civil war. It happened once, it will happen again. Some Americans simply will not be disarmed. Period. And they'll die (and more importantly, kill) to make that stand.

It's a uniquely American trait, and still runs through perhaps 10-15% of the population. And you will *never* force 30+ million armed people to do something they don't want to do.

Yep. Laws for thee, but not for me.

The "law" required Rosa Parks to sit in the back of the bus. The "law" required Americans of Japanese ancestry to go to internment camps. The "law" prohibited alcohol because prudish temperance activists demanded it. The "law" required schools to be segregated. The "law" forbade LGBTQ persons from marrying.

So, would you like to tell us all now how you were in favor of strict adherence to all those laws?

No?

Mmmmmmmmm, ok.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually, the Founders were indeed running around the countryside shooting up small animals with the most advanced military rifles available to them.

Then they shot the British when the British tried to take those rifles.


This country was literally created by people who refused to have their guns confiscated.

BS!

You don't remember One if by land, two if by sea? Real Americans studied this stuff in school. Paperwork Americans didn't have this stuff on the citizenship test.

https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-us-history/period-3/apush-the-american-revolution/a/lexington-and-concord

About 700 British Army regulars in Boston, under Lieutenant Colonel Francis Smith, were given secret orders to capture and destroy Colonial military supplies (arms, ammo and gun powder) reportedly stored by the Massachusetts militia at Concord. Through effective intelligence gathering, Patriot leaders had received word weeks before the expedition that their supplies might be at risk and had moved most of them to other locations. On the night before the battle, warning of the British expedition had been rapidly sent from Boston to militias in the area by several riders, including Paul Revere and Samuel Prescott, with information about British plans. The initial mode of the Army's arrival by water was signaled from the Old North Church in Boston to Charlestown using lanterns to communicate "one if by land, two if by sea". (aka the midnight ride)

The first shots were fired just as the sun was rising at Lexington. Eight militiamen were killed, including Ensign Robert Munroe, their third in command.[10] The British suffered only one casualty. The militia were outnumbered and fell back, and the regulars proceeded on to Concord, where they broke apart into companies to search for the supplies. At the North Bridge in Concord, approximately 400 militiamen engaged 100 regulars from three companies of the King's troops at about 11:00 am, resulting in casualties on both sides. The outnumbered regulars fell back from the bridge and rejoined the main body of British forces in Concord.

It's really sad if you don't know this part of our nations history. Then again Common Core requires little education on the subject: http://newbostonpost.com/2016/04/18/to-bring-back-u-s-history-first-repeal-common-core/

Hey, I suggest the Revolutionary War was not about guns. But, if you are heading to war with someone, you, of course, first go after their weapons and supply lines. Doesn't make the war about guns.

But the gun grab was the event that kicked it into a shooting war. Tensions were smoldering for the years leading up to the outbreak of the war, but until the British tried to seize the Colonist's weapons, it wasn't a shooting-war.

Remarkably similar to where we are right now as a country, divided ideologically into left/right camps.

If the left ever finds itself truly in power, it needs to keep this lesson in mind and temper it's feverish desires to go after guns. Because that will be the act that starts the next civil war. It happened once, it will happen again. Some Americans simply will not be disarmed. Period. And they'll die (and more importantly, kill) to make that stand.

It's a uniquely American trait, and still runs through perhaps 10-15% of the population. And you will *never* force 30+ million armed people to do something they don't want to do.

Yep. Laws for thee, but not for me.

The "law" required Rosa Parks to sit in the back of the bus. The "law" required Americans of Japanese ancestry to go to internment camps. The "law" prohibited alcohol because prudish temperance activists demanded it. The "law" required schools to be segregated. The "law" forbade LGBTQ persons from marrying.

So, would you like to tell us all now how you were in favor of strict adherence to all those laws?

No?

Mmmmmmmmm, ok.

Yeah, I don't think Rosa Parks ever threatened to murder anyone over sitting in the back of the bus, did she?

[Anonymous]

Well if we're talking about murder then, how do you, as a person who likely supports gun confiscation by agents of the state, going to take those guns from people *without* murdering them?

Or is not "murder" when the state does it?

Is it only murder when people resist the govt?

Help me understand your assertion here, since clearly you won't address my points about which laws people pick and choose to obey or not, and why.