How much money should a man make?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As I read this thread, finding it quite depressing that in this day and age, so many women are basically selling there lives for a guy's high income.

I am male. I did not make 130K at 32. I made 40K. I make 180K in my 50's. Not a lot by DCUM standards, but I have a good work-life balance.

We aren't all like that

Maybe if you could spell "their" right, you'd be making more?

Women aren't necessary "selling their lives" for a man's income. I make a lot because I'm smart and well educated. I want a man who can keep up with me intellectually, challenge me, and engage with me. Since I run in high-income circles (co-workers, undergrad, grad, etc.), that's sort of my de facto wheel house socially. Nothing to be depressed about...

We all want. Men want a pretty woman. Most women want a guy with money. What can you actually make happen?

I can be attractive, charming, and engaging right back at him? And utilize my assets when I want to/ feel like it. It's really not rocket science.

I don't need a man. I make my own money and am living my life. So, when I do come across one re: the above- someone who I *want* to be with- that's the easy part. Get it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As I read this thread, finding it quite depressing that in this day and age, so many women are basically selling there lives for a guy's high income.

I am male. I did not make 130K at 32. I made 40K. I make 180K in my 50's. Not a lot by DCUM standards, but I have a good work-life balance.

We aren't all like that

Maybe if you could spell "their" right, you'd be making more?

Women aren't necessary "selling their lives" for a man's income. I make a lot because I'm smart and well educated. I want a man who can keep up with me intellectually, challenge me, and engage with me. Since I run in high-income circles (co-workers, undergrad, grad, etc.), that's sort of my de facto wheel house socially. Nothing to be depressed about...

I used the wrong version of their. BFD. They pay me for my analytical skills not my writing. And I do not give a flying f*** about high income circles. I find people like you to be overly entitled. I tend to focus on intellect rather than income. Far more interesting to talk nuclear physics to someone that about the second act of Hamilton.

[Anonymous]

"Should?" Jesus what a stupid question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What's the least amount a man must make around here to be considered a catch?

I say 150k by 32.

he should make zero. ordinary income, and their taxes, is for losers.

at 32 he should be living off the interest of his interest and cutting deals for equity and ownership. Buffett-style.

[Anonymous]

One million dollars.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was making $220k at 32 but would never share it with a greedy bitch like you. What are you bringing to the table besides a vagina?

Bingo

Yep. This exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's the least amount a man must make around here to be considered a catch?

I say 150k by 32.

he should make zero. ordinary income, and their taxes, is for losers.

at 32 he should be living off the interest of his interest and cutting deals for equity and ownership. Buffett-style.

What do you bring to the table?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As I read this thread, finding it quite depressing that in this day and age, so many women are basically selling there lives for a guy's high income.

I am male. I did not make 130K at 32. I made 40K. I make 180K in my 50's. Not a lot by DCUM standards, but I have a good work-life balance.

We aren't all like that

Maybe if you could spell "their" right, you'd be making more?

Women aren't necessary "selling their lives" for a man's income. I make a lot because I'm smart and well educated. I want a man who can keep up with me intellectually, challenge me, and engage with me. Since I run in high-income circles (co-workers, undergrad, grad, etc.), that's sort of my de facto wheel house socially. Nothing to be depressed about...

I used the wrong version of their. BFD. They pay me for my analytical skills not my writing. And I do not give a flying f*** about high income circles. I find people like you to be overly entitled. I tend to focus on intellect rather than income. Far more interesting to talk nuclear physics to someone that about the second act of Hamilton.

You sound temperamental and not especially intellectual, despite your claim. I prefer to spend time with guys who are as equally appreciate of and interested in the arts and history, a la Hamilton, as they are with more analytical subjands. I love physics but I don't think it's a particularly engaging topic to talk about with someone else. And yes, we all know you can't write.

[Anonymous]

What a ridiculous question, especially in this day and age. Hope it's a troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's the least amount a man must make around here to be considered a catch?

I say 150k by 32.

he should make zero. ordinary income, and their taxes, is for losers.

at 32 he should be living off the interest of his interest and cutting deals for equity and ownership. Buffett-style.

What do you bring to the table?

NP. A sense of humor.

[Anonymous]

More than my DH does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's the least amount a man must make around here to be considered a catch?

I say 150k by 32.

he should make zero. ordinary income, and their taxes, is for losers.

at 32 he should be living off the interest of his interest and cutting deals for equity and ownership. Buffett-style.

What do you bring to the table?

I got my $10M flywheel going.

[sandmguy]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's the least amount a man must make around here to be considered a catch?

I say 150k by 32.

he should make zero. ordinary income, and their taxes, is for losers.

at 32 he should be living off the interest of his interest and cutting deals for equity and ownership. Buffett-style.

What do you bring to the table?

I got my $10M flywheel going.

I got one of those too but I bet mine is bigger.

[Anonymous]

sandmguy wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's the least amount a man must make around here to be considered a catch?

I say 150k by 32.

he should make zero. ordinary income, and their taxes, is for losers.

at 32 he should be living off the interest of his interest and cutting deals for equity and ownership. Buffett-style.

What do you bring to the table?

I got my $10M flywheel going.

I got one of those too but I bet mine is bigger.

Call me in 10 years when I harvest my K-1s. I only quote liquids.