It does seem to be easier in schools where the teachers teach one subject each. That gives them the ability to make differentiated lesson plans on one subject instead of trying to do so for four subjects. It also ensures that a kid who is strong in one subject and not in another will be taught on level in each class, since each teacher is focusing on the child's ability in only their target subject. |
Murch does in-class differentiated instruction well. My kids are both advanced learners, and we've been very pleased. And I agree with PP that good, in-class differentiation is preferable to pull-out/G&T. It keeps classrooms heterogeneous and ensures fluidity; teachers can adjust groups based on observation over the course of the year. |
Agree. I thought Murch did it well nine years ago, and it is even better now. And they keep making adjustments and improvements. I like the daily I/E period. |
| Murch has a new (hopefully this time permanent) SEM (Schoolwide Enrichment Model, for those not in the know) teacher who has taught SEM previously at Hardy. Ms. Bentley is a great addition to the Murch faculty. I hope your kids get to work with her too. |
Ha ha ha. |