What do you think of people who don't own a house/condo/townhouse etc?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:OP here - Not entirely clear why this turned into a discussion of my personal life. Rest assured I have one.

And in terms of why I ask or care, it's bc I've gotten snarky comments from people lately about my choice to rent a 1 bedroom and not buy at least a townhome; a few comments have been from random people - say someone I just met at a party, so it was like who cares. But a few have been from friends. Moved here from NYC 4 yrs ago and people in NYC tend not to ask if you rent/own/want to own. So I don't know if this is another area of DC snark where people feel superior in their financial knowledge and their net worth bc they own and assume you don't own bc you can't afford it.


It's more acceptable to be a high earner and rent in NYC. Owning is expensive in NY and not always a good move financially. Here's it's different. Often times rent is the same if not more than a mortgage on a comparable property. If you don't own here people assume you're either transient or can't save up for a down payment.



This. I know high earners in NYC who are renting and may rent forever -- various reasons; it takes a LONG time to save up the down payment for what they want, or even if they have the down payment ready to go, sometimes the mortgage + maintenance + taxes are structured such that it is cheaper to rent and invest the difference. That's less likely to be true here -- and certainly rarely true if you buy a townhome in Md. or Va.

And as I'm sure you've realized New Yorkers are more live and let live; even if you are making the worst financial move in the world, most of your friends and acquaintances in NYC won't lecture you bc they will assume that you ARE a rational, smart person who must have your reasons. Here -- EVERYONE -- even so called friends -- LOVE to assume that THEY at the smartest and thus you are a moron bc you aren't living how they would be living in your situation. And yes they do feel superiority if they feel you have less than them, financially and thus HAVE TO rent.

Whatever. If you're comfortable with how the numbers are working out for you, keep renting. If/when that ever changes, buy. Just ignore all the "advice" people here try to give you bc you can't assume it's for your benefit.


I don't think it's this. I think it's that many New Yorkers spend all of their money, including high earners. I have quite a few friends who rent and take extravagant vacations, attend pricey charity events, luxury goods etc but rent, don't save any money and still have student loans. They simply don't seem to care.

I'm way more cautious and ambitiously saving towards retirement, paying my mortgage down and paid for graduate school in cash.


True. I do know many high earners in NYC who live large but haven't bought, haven't even really planned when/how they'll buy, and some of them really only started saving for retirement in their mid 30s and even that isn't maxing out. For my friends who are like this though, they have supreme confidence that they absolutely WILL continue to earn 500k or whatever forever, so they don't "need to" plan and can just continue having fun.

In any event, those types of people still judge less than people here. Hard to throw stones that someone hasn't bought, when you yourself are headed off to vacation no. 3 of the yr and aren't looking to buy either.


I disagree. Instead of judging for not saving money they judge you for not living large. My friends seem to not understand why I'm not interested in seeing Hamilton, joining them on pricey vacations, going out to eat all the time, etc. It is because not only did I spend a decade living like that, but I'm now focused on building net worth.

It's also easier to live large in NY and not have anything to show for it. You can rent a pricey rental that's similar to what you'd buy. Here's it's hard to rent a home that's similar to what you'd buy. It's harder to go into an upscale neighborhood here in DC and rent a property. I actually know someone in NY who rents three properties - beach, county and city. Couldn't afford to buy a single one of them if he tried.

I think it will be interesting to see what happens to these people as they have children and get closer to retirement. Can they really count on their high incomes forever? How are they going to keep paying for the rental in NY when the rent goes up annually? I imagine that some of their peers will begin to purchase apartments and vacation homes - especially the true high earners. This makes the 500k hhi spend everything we make look even sillier.


It's not like high earners in NYC NEVER buy. I did biglaw there for 7-8 yrs and then had to get out of the city. What I saw across the board was that most associates did not buy -- even those who were savers and had the down payment on a 1 bedroom. Some didn't buy bc they knew they didn't want to stay in NYC, so they preferred to take their down payment with them to Seattle or Minneapolis or wherever they wanted to move back to and buy a property almost in cash. Others didn't buy bc they wanted to wait until they made partner -- thus they could buy a much bigger/better place. But I don't know a single law firm partner in NYC who doesn't own; part of that though is the uncertainty in law these days. Just bc you make partner doesn't mean you are kept forever, so I have known people who made partner and bought and quickly paid down/off a property in 5-7 yrs so that if they get pushed out, they at least don't have to worry as much about living costs. My friends in finance are different -- more of them haven't bought and intend to continue living large bc they know they can keep making 500k/yr forever. I mean if they get laid off at Goldman, they go to a competitor or a smaller firm that's happy to have them. If somehow that doesn't work out, they have enough investment savvy that they can generate money that way; while they seem like they spend every last dime, I do have finance friends who have stashed away a good amount of capital off of which they could generate income if they had to. That's something most lawyers can't do.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:In their mid 30s. Professional/white collar job. Single - no kids. STILL living in a 1 bedroom apartment.

(No I'm not judging others -- this is MY situation and I'd like to know what impressions others have of me bc from the questions/comments I've gotten, I have a feeling people DO have an opinion about this.)


I would think you're either lazy or scared and don't have any interest in getting your life together. It's not just the house thing but also the fact that you're single at this age with no kids. You're delaying the most important experiences of the average person's life, and probably building wealth more slowly. I have a relative like this, and she is scared of making any important decisions in life.


You don't know that OP is intentionally delaying anything. She or he might not have met the one yet. It happens.


Or maybe she has no desire to own a home, be married &/or have kids. Not everybody wants the sane things in life.
Anonymous
In this area sometimes buying is about getting into the right neighborhood/school district. Doesn't apply to you, but if you look at the best school districts, sometimes (not always), it can be hard to find rentals there or if you find them, it won't be a nice house or townhouse but a really old 1960s style garden apartment. It's possible your friends are projecting onto you bc they HAD TO buy bc they had kids going to school; given that you don't have that right now, I can see how you're not rushing to figure out how to get a house somewhere that'll send your kid to Bradley Hills or wherever.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:In their mid 30s. Professional/white collar job. Single - no kids. STILL living in a 1 bedroom apartment.

(No I'm not judging others -- this is MY situation and I'd like to know what impressions others have of me bc from the questions/comments I've gotten, I have a feeling people DO have an opinion about this.)


I would think you're either lazy or scared and don't have any interest in getting your life together. It's not just the house thing but also the fact that you're single at this age with no kids. You're delaying the most important experiences of the average person's life, and probably building wealth more slowly. I have a relative like this, and she is scared of making any important decisions in life.


You don't know that OP is intentionally delaying anything. She or he might not have met the one yet. It happens.


Or maybe she has no desire to own a home, be married &/or have kids. Not everybody wants the sane things in life.


same things, not sane things!
Anonymous
I'd think they're smart.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I'd think they're smart.


This. I have colleagues your age who aren't buying (bc they may not stay in DC) and instead they throw like 20% of their salaries into index funds every yr -- on top of maxing out 401ks, IRAs etc. They have already realized more growth than I have on the home I bought and I didn't even buy at the market peak or anything.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'd think they're smart.


This. I have colleagues your age who aren't buying (bc they may not stay in DC) and instead they throw like 20% of their salaries into index funds every yr -- on top of maxing out 401ks, IRAs etc. They have already realized more growth than I have on the home I bought and I didn't even buy at the market peak or anything.


I think this is smart. However, most renters are NOT doing this. So that's the question for OP. Is she not buying because she's investing in something else or has she created a lifestyle that requires her to spend all of her income?
Anonymous
I'm in the same boat OP and you know what, I have no problem with how I'm living my life. I don't want to stay in the city I'm in, my rent is reasonable and I'm saving money.

At the end of the day, if I meet the man who will be my future husband then yes, I will probably purchase a home but for now, I'm not interested.
Anonymous
Taking care of a house is a lot of work. And a lot of time. Some just don't want the hassle.

We rent in DC because the commute is so easy and our building is great. We can afford a $900,000 house but not in the DC area we want. Not ready to add an hour to my commute just be a homeowner.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I'm same demographic as you but have bought already, however was talking to a coworker in the same demographic and his reason for not buying yet was that he felt it made more sense to wait till he was engaged/married since then with dual incomes he could buy a better place ... Made a lot of sense and I wish I had waited till I found Ms. Right since I could have got a bigger place.


This. I also would wait till I meet my wife and then buy -- I can afford a bigger, better place with wife's income also.
Anonymous
Op, I'm your age and a divorced mom and I'm still renting. Would you judge me?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Op, I'm your age and a divorced mom and I'm still renting. Would you judge me?


No bc a lot of people would expect that someone who got divorced reasonably recently and is a mom would be renting -- unless she's super high income, she has a lot of demands on her budget. That's different than someone who is single and is a high enough earner that they can buy but just don't.
Anonymous
uh, I probably wouldn't think of it at all. If prompted, I'd think they spend less of their time and money on home maintenance than I do. I know several thirty something professionals who recently bought townhomes and are superexcited about it. I keep thinking (but not saying) WHY WHY WHY would you do that to yourself?
Anonymous
Why would a single person buy a house? They only need one bedroom, and it is much cheaper to rent a one-bedroom apartment than to pay for a 2-3 bedroom house or condo. Keep renting until you partner up, then make a joint decision about where to buy a home.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I would probably think you don't want to settle down. We are mid 30's with 2 kids and 1 on the way. We have 2 homes and 3 cars and funding retirement and college funds.


Isn't that nice.


I was just implying that when you are married with kids, you tend to be more focused on security. You have different needs and goals. Men tend to work harder when they have families to support.

My single friends are not thinking about paying for college for 3 kids. They don't need a big house with enough bedrooms to allow family to come visit their grandchildren.


dude, that's not "security" - that's just being wealthy. which is great for you! congratulations!!
post reply Forum Index » Money and Finances
Message Quick Reply
Go to: