The Slate article, like most "popular reading," is rather simplistic. More in depth studies demonstrate that "academic preschools" that use rote learning, memorization, and drilling (endless worksheets, Kumon, etc.) for preschool age kids are detrimental. They create learning anxiety, reduce imagination and problem-solving initiative, and increase aversion to school. |
|
Here's a description of Appletree's curriculum:
http://www.appletreeinstitute.org/every-child-ready/current-products/ It doesn't sound all that different from what a poster above is claiming as "play-based" (the highly teacher-directed restaurant scene) although maybe there's more free time? |
+1 (Yes, anxiety.) |
|
|
Thins who proudly identify themselves as academic preschools. And there are many parents who are anxious, but ignorant and think that the worksheets and drilling are giving their children a head start on learning. |
I still want to know how 3 and 4 year olds, the vast majority of who cannot write or read, do worksheets? |
They circle, they select, given multiple choice type of questions, but the problem is when they are corrected in a serious way, by a teacher, when they are told something is not correct. This was a practice with 3-year-olds. Plus, it came with a huge price tag. |
That's how the schools try to teach reading, writing, and math -- through the use of worksheets. They have kids write the same things over and over and fill in math sheets. The kids do memorize a lot of things, but they are way too young to truly understand things conceptually. It can really F**& up their relationship with learning. |
| "Play-based" = $35,000 per year (not including aftercare). |
Where do you get this from? There are plenty of part-time church based play based preschools that are around $250/month. |
NP here. Total BS. We attended a wonderful, no-name play-based preschool, after almost sending DC to a Montessori school. Montessori is great in many ways, but it is NOT play-based. They are quite rigid in stating that children should NOT play with the manipulative-- they are only to be used a certain way and God forbid if they start using their imaginations and pretend with them. A good play-based school will encourage imaginative play. I'm so glad I followed my gut. The play-based school was a much better for for my imaginative, play-oriented child. DC's WPPSI's were in the 99 percentile and above, and DC was admitted to every private school we applied to. DC is very happy at a Big 3 that is also a great fit. But, to go back to play-based, our no-name preschool was indeed church-based. Tuition was about $250/month for two days a week (2 year olds), $350 for 3 days a week (3 year olds) and $500 for 5 days a week (4 year olds). Most of the other play-based we looked at were also in that range. Granted, these schools only went from 8:30-12:00 pm. |
are you sure this is preschool and not K? none of the children (even the advanced ones) could have done worksheets like that at 3. |
| Even art projects can reflect the philosophy of the school. Are the kids shown a sample project made by the teacher and then given the supplies to make their own (which, of course, will be sloppy and cockeyed by comparison), or are they given a collection of raw materials and told to make them into whatever they want? The first approach can damage self-esteem, whereas the latter fosters creativity and imagination. |
Since you are so skeptical, why don't you do your own research? Google academic preschool, then go visit the schools who advertise themselves that way instead of being an arm-chair skeptic who clearly has no clue. |