OK -- I see your point. Please do post back later if you can. Many thanks! |
Are you black or hispanic? That helps tremendously. She will get in if you are black. Chances are much better if you are hispanic. White is good too. Asian, not so much. |
|
'don't sacrifice a strong engineering program for Ivy prestige."
IF the engineering degree is a stepping stone to an non-engineering profession (MBA or law degree) THEN this is terrific advice, but if the DC is truly interested in engineering, the Ivy league is NOT the way to go. |
Well, this raises an interesting point. I'm pretty sure she's not going to law school (DH and I are lawyers -- 'nuff said there), but biz school is definitely a possibility, and this consideration did, in part, shape our list of schools to explore. We would certainly appreciate other perspectives on this issue -- why do engineers go to biz school? what do they do after biz school?, etc. |
I went to an engineering school for a year, but was very distracted by all the boys. Too many boys and too much beer. |
|
Illinois
Wisconsin Minnesota Missouri Science & Technology (not highly ranked,but ranked in some best return for investment lists Purdue NewCollege of Florida Texas Washington University |
Cornelll and Princeton excepted. |
|
I'm the engineer who went into consulting.
Out of my engineering friends from undergrad, I'd say that easily 1/2 did not go into the engineering profession. A lot went into consulting, many went back to b-school and then into finance or strategic consulting, a handful went into law (mostly patent/IP), a few went into academia. A handful went into finance out of undergrad. A handful became entrepreneurs and developed new products/services (not necessarily related to their undergrad field). A few went back to help run their family's engineering business. A few were also pre-med/biomechanical. The fields with the most amount of practicing engineers are: - c/s, computer engineering - civil - environmental - mechanical I can't think of anyone who stuck with electrical or chemical. I'm sure there were some, but they didn't seem as common. Almost all of the operations research grads went into various flavors of consulting. The one true "rocket scientist" (hardcore aerospace) I knew ended up with an MD. I would definitely encourage her to keep MIT and Stanford on her list. Princeton isn't for everyone, but it's worth a look. As for the schools on your list, I think they are all good engineering schools, strong in multiple fields. They all offer a variety of programs that might appeal to your DD -- combined majors, hands-on projects, study abroad, etc. I would be happy if my own DD attended any one of them. Without knowing more about her interests it's tough to differentiate them for your DD. One differentiator is that Brown is more theoretical (IMO), better if she wants to head to grad school/academia. Just a very different feel overall as a school. Worth taking a look though. With that list I would probably look at other factors to see what appeals to her -- location, sports, culture, social, etc. Attend info sessions to get a better feel. Go tour the campuses and sit in on a few classes. Look for a summer program at her fav. Sorry for the stream of thought! Trying to squeeze this in before a meeting! |
My father, brother, and almost all of my cousins were engineers that went to b-school. Why? Because unless you truly LOVE and LIVE FOR R&D or maintaining/building processes or things, being a practicing engineer at a large corporation sucks...i.e. being a dev, test, process management/etc... father was a software dev that went to b-school so he could gain a promotion to management. brother was a Electrical Engineer who went to b-school so it could help him go into trading at a hedge fund. all of my cousins who were engineers went to b-school for the recruiting/career shift...i.e. they needed to in order to 'break' into top-end strategy consulting or quantitative finance. Why did almost all engineers in my family do this? Money and boredom. the money in engineering as you progress in your career pales in comparison to finance or consulting unless you break in at the right time at a start up and get equity or you are very very lucky and grind yourself towards the c-suite. At my grad school last week a ph.d theoretical physicist (princeton) who worked on some very groundbreaking research on fusion energy in the 80's shifted to mckinsey and then to citigroup.....late 80's and after the wall came down he was worried that funding was going to dry up for the stuff he wanted to work on so he went into high-money areas. And if someone like him...who was a budding rockstar in his field of expertise shifted away, i can't blame the vast majority of engineers who are tempted or want to leave practicing as engineers. |
|
| Dartmouth has a 5 yrs engineering BA which (once in) in not as cut-throat as state u's. It seems like a supportive, engaging environment. |
This. Unless she hooks up with a start-up her salary will never really grow. Went to ivy but liked being technical so never went into consulting like 60% of my engineering class. Your salary will top out around 170k, maybe more if go into management (but if managing might as well do consulting and make far more money). I love science and technology, and enjoy what I do, but we have serious compromises living in a high cost area (and in US most places with jobs and good schools are high cost). Most of my colleagues commute really far to afford decent living. This will sound cynical and maybe even sexist, but this is something my wife had discussed as we see our nieces grow up and date, but maybe consider one of the more academically diverse ivies like Cornell or Princeton; then she might marry a doctor, lawyer, or investment banker and get to have the career she wants rather than having dual engineers who bothy at work even when kids are small, and always be struggling to make ends meet (eng salaries see lot of age discrimination and outsourcing pressure). But if u are both lawyers and can gift them a huge down payment for their housing, then maybe less of concern and they will be ok. |
I get that DC is a high cost of living area, but seriously, if you are a dual income family with two engineers, that means your salary will top off around 240K. That sounds more than live-able to me. It also has a far higher earning potential than most lines of work. |
PP that you quoted (i also wrote posts earlier in this thread regarding operations research and schools with good programs)...anyways just wanted to highlight these two very important pieces you wrote for the OP to digest. Regarding the start-up thing...there are many people in the valley who know they 'lucked' out on joining the right start up in the right time. I know two engineers (through my mom) that were out in the valley years ago both working at a well known tech firm right out of undergrad. Both went to the same school, same grades, only a couple of years apart, same major....both left to join start ups in 1997. the younger one joined netflix. the older one joined another company. the younger one is worth easily 8 figures due to early netflix equity and the other is grinding away as a vp at a tech firm after going through multiple start-up busts and firings during the 2000 tech crash. its not an uncommon story. engineering out there is a 'feast of famine' sector. the 2nd part i highlighted also contributes to this. unlike medicine (or law....though the aba does NOT protect its members from outside market forces like the AMA does), there is no 'licensing' and other artificial barriers to entry. engineering is all about driving efficiencies and more and more can be done anywhere. the work can be sent to other facilities outside of the country or cheaper engineers can be brought in to replace you. market forces can act like a vice, putting pressure from both sides on workers wages and job security. Things are a bit different in DC because a lot of engineers have security clearances and if you are an engineer who joins nsa, cia, nga out of school and then after 5-10 years moves over to lockheed or a contractor....you will get compensated very well and have a 'shield' against foreigners (or even others outside of the community) putting pressure on your wages due to ts/sci full-scope poly thing. I don't want to discourage any future engineers though...there are many who truly love being engineers and are willing to sacrifice money or QoL for the chance to go into work everyday to build cool shit. ee's, nasa types, arch.e's , formula 1 engineers, etc.....but there are a lot more who realize they don't love it....and for those that fall under the later camp, going to a school that allows for a better chance to jump fields is more beneficial. |
I guess it's all relative. $340k certainly isn't shabby, but that's assuming that both spouses are at the top of their career. While my engineering friends started off with a decent salary ($40-60k for undergrad), the growth was rather slow compared to other professions. I'm sure it took them 10-15 years to get to close to $170k. At least. Also, if they choose to live off one salary to have a SAHP then $170k is very tight in this area. I don't think it's something you do if you're trying to make the big BIG bucks. Definitely not too shabby, but also not rolling in the dough. Coming out of a top engineering school you have a lot of earning potential. Guess you have to decide if you want to sell your soul to the devil (consulting, etc.) or follow your passion. -Engr in Consulting |