Is Brent the best school in Capitol hill?

[Anonymous]

No I am not Cherita Whiting. Is that the chick eho basically saved McKinley Tech from disaster. Did she not endorse a white principal not only the first one but the second one. Although her AA counterparts said she was a sellout because she endorsed white leadership at a predominantly AA enrolled school. If that is the way she's percieved by you...consider yourself being clairvoyant.

Again, when I read the little blip that there's a community of y'all who will LIE to go-along to get-along, purely intrigued me. Why can't there be honest dialogue. What ever it took for you to get here, then by George use that same energy to go away. Many of you are not willing to make changes of substance but just want drastic changes.

A test-in middle school is now the code word for keeping out less diserables. I think I'll start a Youtube sensation called "The Shit White Parents say in regards to DCPS." Stay tuned.

By the way Cherita is still mourning the lost of her family member, Chuck Brown, the Godfather of Go-Go.

[Anonymous]

"Best" is in the eye of the beholder. Not every parent is looking for the same thing where it comes to "best".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Strut your stuff, Brent families. Brag on or bring it on, Brent families. Let's see the goal is to get a middle-school to keep white families here after 3rd grade. Hmmm, nothing beats a failure but a try. It worked with the Banneker and the SWW experiment. So, keep at it, don't give up Brent families, I am counting on you to do this as an AA family, I am so vested to this idea. Go head white families lay down the foundation and I as an AA family will just enter on the premise; that if you try to keep me out, I will scream racism. See, the harder you try to change, it will all remain the same in some form or fashion.

I'm AA and I'll be the one calling you a reverse racist, hon. What a pathetic post. Tax payers deserve challenge for their kids. PPs aren't talking about keeping white families after 3rd grade; they're talking about keeping voters w/children here. My advanced kid is just as bored at S-H as white kids and some other AA kids, so we're bailing. Scream racism all you like, you will be in the dim-witted minority on the Hill soon enough and the politicians won't be able to listen AND keep their jobs. The harder the Brent and Maury parents try, the more likely they are to succeed because they deserve success for their incredibly hard work in turning those schools around. Some of you have short memories and histories on the Hill - I remember Brent when there wasn't a middle-class kid of any color there.

I'd kill for a test-in MS, like those in other E. Coast cities, because my kid would almost certainly test-in. We've made sure of that at home. Hint: we don't have a TV, hire tutors, and have the integrity and vision not to cry racism when we can't, or won't, compete.


Crazy Elliot-Hine poster, sounds like you just got served.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No I am not Cherita Whiting. Is that the chick eho basically saved McKinley Tech from disaster. Did she not endorse a white principal not only the first one but the second one. Although her AA counterparts said she was a sellout because she endorsed white leadership at a predominantly AA enrolled school. If that is the way she's percieved by you...consider yourself being clairvoyant.

Again, when I read the little blip that there's a community of y'all who will LIE to go-along to get-along, purely intrigued me. Why can't there be honest dialogue. What ever it took for you to get here, then by George use that same energy to go away. Many of you are not willing to make changes of substance but just want drastic changes.

A test-in middle school is now the code word for keeping out less diserables. I think I'll start a Youtube sensation called "The Shit White Parents say in regards to DCPS." Stay tuned.

By the way Cherita is still mourning the lost of her family member, Chuck Brown, the Godfather of Go-Go.

It is perverse how you make everything into white/black. You do it on many threads and it is destructive and pathetic.
What do you have to say about the many many high SES AA families at Brent? I am talking Ivy League, million dollar home-owning AAs. I know them. I am a Brent parent. They want challenge. They want test-in programs for their high performing kids. They are hiring tutors to get the challenge their kids need. Are they "acting white" and therefore don't count?

Also, how do biracial, high-SES parents of high-performing kids fit into your prehistoric world view? Are they "acting white" and therefore don't count? Brent is chock full of these.

So, you feel test-in programs for GT kids are exclusive? What should GT kids do all day? Be bored shitless? Have any enthusiasm for learning they may have be squashed? If you have a GT kid, what do you want for them? How do you feel they should spend their day?

WTF? Crabs in a bucket. If one crawls up to the rim, you want to pull him down with the rest.

And please don't make any assumptions about my race.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No I am not Cherita Whiting. Is that the chick eho basically saved McKinley Tech from disaster. Did she not endorse a white principal not only the first one but the second one. Although her AA counterparts said she was a sellout because she endorsed white leadership at a predominantly AA enrolled school. If that is the way she's percieved by you...consider yourself being clairvoyant.

Again, when I read the little blip that there's a community of y'all who will LIE to go-along to get-along, purely intrigued me. Why can't there be honest dialogue. What ever it took for you to get here, then by George use that same energy to go away. Many of you are not willing to make changes of substance but just want drastic changes.

A test-in middle school is now the code word for keeping out less diserables. I think I'll start a Youtube sensation called "The Shit White Parents say in regards to DCPS." Stay tuned.

By the way Cherita is still mourning the lost of her family member, Chuck Brown, the Godfather of Go-Go.

It is perverse how you make everything into white/black. You do it on many threads and it is destructive and pathetic.
What do you have to say about the many many high SES AA families at Brent? I am talking Ivy League, million dollar home-owning AAs. I know them. I am a Brent parent. They want challenge. They want test-in programs for their high performing kids. They are hiring tutors to get the challenge their kids need. Are they "acting white" and therefore don't count?

Also, how do biracial, high-SES parents of high-performing kids fit into your prehistoric world view? Are they "acting white" and therefore don't count? Brent is chock full of these.

So, you feel test-in programs for GT kids are exclusive? What should GT kids do all day? Be bored shitless? Have any enthusiasm for learning they may have be squashed? If you have a GT kid, what do you want for them? How do you feel they should spend their day?

WTF? Crabs in a bucket. If one crawls up to the rim, you want to pull him down with the rest.

And please don't make any assumptions about my race.

Yes, that prehistoric world view is alive and well, this forum went down that path with the HUMS thread, and yes, they basically said no, high-SES AAs don't count, biracial people don't count, immigrants from Africa do not count, Barack Obama does not count, nor does any person of color who has ever accomplished anything or otherwise made it in life.

And yes, there are definitely some on this forum who absolutely do want to deny opportunity for G&T students.

[Anonymous]

+1

[Anonymous]

I see now G&T want their own school and the pre-requisite is to test-in. This is too alleviate ALL of the social-ills of the world that bi-racial, immigrants and AAs who live million dollar homes are experiencing. I got it. You called out Cherita and the response irritated you and you want me to believe that you have a G&T child. I think you are probably raising future W&S children.

Why are you insulted with my racial over-tones? Really, you find it pathetic by reading my posts, do you live in DC under a rock. Your day to day interactions must be in a house of mirrors. Remember it was you who said you could imagine the way Cherita would talk. Hmm, it all starts with imaginary friends, that's okay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see now G&T want their own school and the pre-requisite is to test-in. This is too alleviate ALL of the social-ills of the world that bi-racial, immigrants and AAs who live million dollar homes are experiencing. I got it. You called out Cherita and the response irritated you and you want me to believe that you have a G&T child. I think you are probably raising future W&S children.

Why are you insulted with my racial over-tones? Really, you find it pathetic by reading my posts, do you live in DC under a rock. Your day to day interactions must be in a house of mirrors. Remember it was you who said you could imagine the way Cherita would talk. Hmm, it all starts with imaginary friends, that's okay.

What's W&S?

[Anonymous]

It would be nice if not every Capitol Hill schools thread was eventually taken over by racially hostile word salad poster. Sigh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see now G&T want their own school and the pre-requisite is to test-in. This is too alleviate ALL of the social-ills of the world that bi-racial, immigrants and AAs who live million dollar homes are experiencing. I got it. You called out Cherita and the response irritated you and you want me to believe that you have a G&T child. I think you are probably raising future W&S children.

Why are you insulted with my racial over-tones? Really, you find it pathetic by reading my posts, do you live in DC under a rock. Your day to day interactions must be in a house of mirrors. Remember it was you who said you could imagine the way Cherita would talk. Hmm, it all starts with imaginary friends, that's okay.

Firstly, I'm not the previous poster, and I don't particularly care who or what Cherita is or isn't.

But I did note that by these notions reinforced at 11:26 et cetera of separating out of biracial people, AAs in million dollar homes and black immigrants "from the social ills", the argument that race is to be equated with social ills cancels itself out. It's NOT about race - and anyone who thinks those AAs in million dollar homes, biracial folks et cetera - people of color with a totally different perspective than what is being expressed by some here - that they are "imaginary" or do not exist or that their perspectives are invalid or otherwise do not count - that is who is living under a rock.

That said, I'm not in favor of test-based admissions but I do believe in diagnostic testing and remedial work where needed. Testing at least establishes where students are lacking and what they need. If for example a 4th grader still cannot read, that's a problem - particularly since so much subsequent school work is based on reading, and that 4th grader needs to do a lot more remedial work in reading to get up to speed. It's a problem that gets amplified more and more with each year that it's let go. But apparently the notion is that we should not do that testing, we should not be honest with ourselves, we should not bother trying to fix the problems, and instead just sweep it all under the rug, and let that student grow up with an ever-increasing sense of low self-esteem because of their poor grades and not being able to keep up, to possibly drop out, to likely never to get a decent job in their lifetime. Set up for failure in 4th grade. One life after another ruined just because some fool wants to blame everything and everyone else, and just sweep the problem under the rug rather than deal with it properly.

[Anonymous]

I'm an AA Brent parent who grew up in a housing project in another E. Coast city but was lucky enough to attended GT and test-in magnets from 2nd grade up. I went on to an excellent liberal arts college and top MBA program. I earn several times what my non-AA spouse, an NGO worker, does.

I find that those against GT and test-in programs almost always fall into one of two categories. Category A: people who didn't need such programs to attend top colleges, or land good jobs, because they grew up in middle-class enclaves. Category B: people whose children aren't academic enough to qualify, for whatever reasons.

The city's refusal to identify the brightest low-income kids from a young age, or to supoort the advanced work they need to keep up with high-SES peers, is simply criminal. What irks me the most about the set-up is the way white liberals with children in public schools often buy into the paternalistic view that test-in programs are "bad" for low-SES AA kids. Were they bad for Michelle Obama and her brother in Chicago? I also get angry when fellow AA parents reject such programs out of hand, generally due to lack of experience with them.

Well-administred urban GT and test-in programs actively identify low-SES talent young and cultivate it aggressively. If one test had been the sole admissions criterion, I wouldn't have made the grade. But that was far from the case - an interview, a parent interview (yes, my single parent had to demonstrate discipline and committment, too), a series of tests, and teacher recommendations all contributed to my selection as a participant. I'm tired of knee jerk reactions to the concept of selectivity in public schools in this city. As things stand, we'll go private for MS and HS. How will low-SES AA kids benefit? One less high-SES peer and parent role model to be had. Fantastic.

[Anonymous]

13:10, I am the sock-puppet and I agree with you. I belive in what you said too, in regards to the diagnostic and remedial testing. This either you'r e in or you're out way of thinking can be racially divided. Again, there are not enough G&T children in DCPS to fill a classroom of a decent size. You might have a smither here and there but not a true school population. It's not the AA community lack of experience with G&T but it is the "snake-oil" person who's trying make it seem that it is better than slice bread. I feel and I have experienced it first hand, that many school personnel are their own worst enemies when trying to entice AA families into beneficial programs. All of sudden everyone wants to become the Jack Nicholson character in a movie. They want to give you the dialogue of "you want the truth but you can't handle the truth." As a result, all of sudden we are back to square one with the skeptical look at those in charge of the program. If my child gets into a G&T is he/she exceptional or an experiment? Do I disregard the dialogue of honesty from a well respected educator?

You only get one chance with your child's public-school's education, what does one really do with it?

[Anonymous]

@12:26 W&S stood for Weird and Strange.

[Anonymous]

@12:41, It only takes two to initiate dialogue and if you don't care for the dialogue, then alt-ctrl-delete, yourself out of it.

[Anonymous]

Back to the question at hand.... in my opinion Brent is the nicest *facility* that I have seen on the Hill. Although I have not been inside Tyler and it was also modernized recently.