And yet you women salivate over men. But you aren't thinking about how it affects your son. |
Did you post this on the other thread? No? Why not? |
It baffles me how the Hit it Thursday thread has been going strong for months with no wrath, yet this one is on page 6 and the women at freaking out. Are you ladies for real? |
nope - didn't post on the other thread However, that doesn't mean that I don't find both of them offensive to some extent. Again, if you found your friends wanking off to a picture of your daughter, you'd be fine with it. At least that's what I'm reading. And if your daughter only came home with hunky assholes b/c it's all about looks, you'd be fine with that, too. I have a son AND a daughter who are certainly NOT sheltered. They watch TV and surf the net. But I do let them know the definition of self-respect. So while I'm a Debbie Downer on this thread, think about this: How many of you would post a seductive shot of your own kids on one of these threads? I bet not many . . . |
| Let the dads have their fun!!!! Gee whiz ... moms have had I'd Hit That Thursday for AGES!!!! |
| Someone post a Martha Burk picture to calm these shrews. Jeez. |
This isn't a sexiest kids thread, or a child porn thread so I am unclear of the point you are trying to make. You're policing adults, both male & female who are enjoying the beauty of other grown adults. Yes, some of the shots are sexy, but guess what? Not one of those photos is a shot of someone being forces to pose the way they did. They consented and it was put out there for people to look at. Please take your conservative values that make no sense and visit a forum that appeals to what you think is not offensive to you. |
| The reason that I hate this thread is that IHTT is open to men to post in. Also, Wednesday is for posting Gratuitous pictures of yourself. This thread is in direct violation of established internet law. As such, it is null and void should be pwn'd. |
Again - why not? Didn't get that riled up about it? It's different somehow? |
Just curious, why do you find that so intriguing? Not everyone falls for the sterotypical blonde.
But if it helps for example, I've had a thing for Jennifer since I first saw her in "Labyrinth" when I was 16. |
Ahhhhh, shut it. Are you some sister wife who just wants her magic underwear DH to be happy all the time? Women have been objectified and demonized throughout society because of their lack perfect looks. Anorexia? Hello? Men shouldn't get a pass here. The reverse is not true for men. Men do not suffer in society just because they don't look like Jon Hamm--quite the opposite--good looking, hunky guys aren't taken very seriously in the working world. This thread continues the pattern of subjugating an oppressed class. That is why this thread is intolerable, while IHHT is not. |
|
|
So again, it's okay for women to objectify attractive men, but not for men (and women!) to look at attractive women? How many of the women here are anorezic thin models? Sarah Palin? No. JLH? JLO? Sandra Smith? No. Lanisha Cole? No. Connie Britton? No. I see a variety of women from various age groups and body types. Please pull your panties out of the wod they are in and step off of your soapbox. All you are is a hypocrite. |
|
Subjugating an oppressed class?
Wealthy hollywood actresses and supermodels are surely an oppressed class. LOL. |