Any tips for figuring this out? IME, it's rarely clear who a hiring manager is. I encourage DD to reach out to any alumni at the company to help refer her but would love to just message the recruiter/hiring manager. |
|
Thank you.
-[normally resilient] person 45+ unemployed 9 mo.+ and crying into coffee every morning. |
PP, there are a lot of us on here just like yourself! |
| I know. (Hug, even though I don't know you.) We will get through this. |
That was my post and the recruiter's response indicates to me that the menu of jobs for which the recruiter hires are targeted at highly mobile and younger-age skewing roles. If you are hiring for a senior expert or executive, you'd want to know how they built their career. I believe the advice given is specific to that recruiter's world. And maybe not for Gen-X DCUM mid-career wonks. My company's ATS includes 7 job blocks. There are people who go shallow so could cover 7 blocks in 14 years. But with a 4-6 year product life cycle, in my industry, that would mean dangerously shallow experience. Having never stuck around to a project's completion. One thing that is consistent is that readers don't read carefully or have patience at the resume stage. Heck, people don't even interview carefully. So shorter is usually always better. |
You’re not alone! Here for the same reason. It’s hard, humbling and feels hopeless at times. It doesn’t help things are changing so fast and it feels impossible to keep up. |
Thank you. |
|
Not the OP or recruiter but someone who's both interviewed and hired at a F500, do have a few comments:
1. Can confirm it takes 2-3 months from job advert to onboarding. Everyone complains about how long it is but it's really due to having multiple interviews, multiple interviewers and getting the schedules down. Then sometimes the JD changes due to new priorities. Then getting the offer approvals. People are always on PTO or busy with other work. 2. The comment about TNR surprised me, I wouldn't have cared if I saw it on a resume but do agree Arial is the way to go. Clean and simple. 3. There are a lot of vagaries affecting how people are hired. Will say my two best hires were people who'd reached out to someone on the team on LinkedIn and they in turn alerted me and it made me take a second look at their resume. And it stood out in a way it didn't before. The unfortunate reality is when I'm busy, there's a stack of resumes from the recruiter, it's easy to gloss over them and nitpick. The people who reached out on LinkedIn were suddenly more real. They got prioritized. Note that their resumes did have all the qualifications we needed. 4. Because there's so many vagaries in hiring, you need to keep applying and never assume anything. |
In LI if the recruiter chose to toggle “show my profile” then that makes it easy. Reach out to them. If that is not avail, 100% reach out o an alumni. “Hi so and so, I’m reaching out to fellow Cardinals. I saw this posting at your company could you help me locate the recruiter or hiring manager for this role?” Worst that can happen is no response. Best that can happen - they let you know ‘it’s my buddy Jane and I’ll be happy to refer you!’ (bc they get the 3k referral bonus if you get hired). I get that no response feels like rejection. Tell them to just do it. Don’t overthink the process. It’s just a process. |
|
How common is it to post a job when you already have a candidate in mind that will likely be hired?
What percentage of candidates make it all the way through the process and end up turning down an offer? |
|
Unemployed people also often are a bit lazy in job hunting. For instance I got up every day at 6 am and scanned for new postings and apply. I also do that at lunch time, end of day, and at bedtime and had multilple auto alerts to my inbox. Getting in first is important. Also right after applying I would do a LinkedIn search of people at company (not in hiring process) who looked important and then try to connect.
I also be ready 24/7 on phone or email if I got contacted. |
First more and more states are requiring the salary range to be posted for pay transparency. Many companies are just defaulting to the new standard nationwide and posting the ranges even in say Texas. This is a good thing for candidates. You now have information that you did not have 6 years ago. Also It is illegal in a several states for the recruiter to ask "What are you making now? / Where are you at now?" so again, most of us have defaulted to not asking it. If you offer the information though, that's on you. Couple things: If the salary range is wide - say 136K - 285K - the company has chosen to post the entire pay range for the role. Know that it is highly unlikely that we will hire at the top end of the range! We're really aiming for the midpoint (or just below or just above depending on comp philosophy) If the salary range is narrow - say 150K-175K - the company has condensed the range to the midpoints. We WILL hire anywhere in this condensed range. If we are short of your base salary expectations simply don't apply for the role. We're not stretching our salary ranges in this market. As awesome as you may be, there are 3 other candidates just as qualified. If the role does not have a salary range, you can get intelligence on the salary question - it's pretty easy to triangulate to a market range. Between payscale glassdoor (no they are not 100% accurate that's why you're triangulating) and posted salary ranges, you should be able to come up with a range to answer the question that 1) is inside the market range 2) meets your needs and engages you. |
So this is not helpful nor true, particularly during this unique economic environment/administration. |
You be surprised some jobs auto close after a certain amount of application. There are 3,890,000 jobs posted on LinkedIN as of today. |
| They meant the comment about many unemployed people being lazy not being helpful, I think. |