Heather Cox Richardson

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:God, this person. There's a gray-haired. late-40s, single (so middle aged, yes) woman at my place of employ, who comes into my office maybe once a month and wastes a good 30 minutes of my time, and it's highly common it is about whatever it is this person has recently had on her mind. And I just smile and nod.

When Heather Cox Richardson is wrong, will you admit maybe she doesn't know what she thinks she knows about things that are way out of her lane?

Of course this woman is single. That's actually an important point.

I don’t see how that’s relevant & who cares. And, she is not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did she have any thought on the legality of Obama droning US citizens? Nah.

Was Obama ever accused of violating the Constitution? Such ignorance on your part.

NP. Let's not revise history just because we dislike Trump. Obama's deliberate killing of known American citizens with drones was absolutely called out as a violation of the Constitution both at the time and after.

https://mwi.westpoint.edu/ten-years-after-the-al-awlaki-killing-a-reckoning-for-the-united-states-drones-wars-awaits/

Shame on people like you for trying to memory hole this crazy violation that actually exceeds anything Trump has done to date.

Trump unconstitutionally turned the whole federal government upside down, including disappearing ad doing who knows what to American citizens on American territory!

Does that change the unconstitutionality, lawlessness, and extremism of Obama's extrajudicial executions of American citizens?

Always with the whataboutism. It frankly is exhausting. For once, I would love an intellectual argument/discussion with a conservative. Conservatives are an endless well of bad faith arguments.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The seer of white, middle aged, UMC liberal women has spoken.

She actually isn't liberal. She's a historian.

Academics are well known for their balanced approach to political issues.

I know that a lot of folks took the shortest of buses to school…but there isn’t an approach. There aren’t liberal branches of mathematics. People become experts in their fields and they share their expertise through teaching or practicing in their field. We have morons doubting science all of the time…always some stupid conspiracy or bias.

You know the saying, reality has a liberal bias.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I like HCR but she is a historian, not expert in authoritarianism. Better to little to Ruth Ben-Ghiat and Timothy Snyder. HCR is increasing out of her lane as she’s become more popular. Remember when she weighed in when Schumer caved on the shutdown?

We can manage multiple sources of information and analysis and weigh them based on their expertise, sources, and the logic of their arguments.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have only heard of HCR on DCUM but it seems like people are outsourcing their critical thinking to her. It's not like she's a prophet.

Reading someone's work and discussing it is not outsourcing critical thinking. My DH sends some of her columns to our boys, and it generates very interesting discussions about current events and history.

[Anonymous]

For those who like her work, she’s speaking at the National Cathedral in February.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did she have any thought on the legality of Obama droning US citizens? Nah.

Was Obama ever accused of violating the Constitution? Such ignorance on your part.

NP. Let's not revise history just because we dislike Trump. Obama's deliberate killing of known American citizens with drones was absolutely called out as a violation of the Constitution both at the time and after.

https://mwi.westpoint.edu/ten-years-after-the-al-awlaki-killing-a-reckoning-for-the-united-states-drones-wars-awaits/

Shame on people like you for trying to memory hole this crazy violation that actually exceeds anything Trump has done to date.

Trump unconstitutionally turned the whole federal government upside down, including disappearing ad doing who knows what to American citizens on American territory!

Does that change the unconstitutionality, lawlessness, and extremism of Obama's extrajudicial executions of American citizens?

Always with the whataboutism. It frankly is exhausting. For once, I would love an intellectual argument/discussion with a conservative. Conservatives are an endless well of bad faith arguments.

Well, if it weren't for double standards, Republicans wouldn't have any standards at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have only heard of HCR on DCUM but it seems like people are outsourcing their critical thinking to her. It's not like she's a prophet.

What an idiotic statement. Do better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[url]

Anonymous wrote:The seer of white, middle aged, UMC liberal women has spoken.

When you get mad at derision toward white men pushing younger males to the right, know that derision toward women is pushing younger women to the left, statistically far more than men are moving to the right.

Who cares? They are girls and cant do jack sh*t. Isnt that what all their anger is about?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[url]

Anonymous wrote:The seer of white, middle aged, UMC liberal women has spoken.

When you get mad at derision toward white men pushing younger males to the right, know that derision toward women is pushing younger women to the left, statistically far more than men are moving to the right.

Who cares? They are girls and cant do jack sh*t. Isnt that what all their anger is about?

Well, you might care if you want to encourage young women to vote red. But I guess you don't care about losing female votes even when they aree the majority of the population and may end up deciding close elections.

Keep up talking how you are talking if you don't care! Thank you! You are helping Democrats! Much appreciated!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[url]

Anonymous wrote:The seer of white, middle aged, UMC liberal women has spoken.

When you get mad at derision toward white men pushing younger males to the right, know that derision toward women is pushing younger women to the left, statistically far more than men are moving to the right.

Who cares? They are girls and cant do jack sh*t. Isnt that what all their anger is about?

The girls will be taking up arms in no time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did she have any thought on the legality of Obama droning US citizens? Nah.

Was Obama ever accused of violating the Constitution? Such ignorance on your part.

NP. Let's not revise history just because we dislike Trump. Obama's deliberate killing of known American citizens with drones was absolutely called out as a violation of the Constitution both at the time and after.

https://mwi.westpoint.edu/ten-years-after-the-al-awlaki-killing-a-reckoning-for-the-united-states-drones-wars-awaits/

Shame on people like you for trying to memory hole this crazy violation that actually exceeds anything Trump has done to date.

Trump unconstitutionally turned the whole federal government upside down, including disappearing ad doing who knows what to American citizens on American territory!

Does that change the unconstitutionality, lawlessness, and extremism of Obama's extrajudicial executions of American citizens?

Always with the whataboutism. It frankly is exhausting. For once, I would love an intellectual argument/discussion with a conservative. Conservatives are an endless well of bad faith arguments.

You should try reading before pasting your pre-written rant. PP asked if Obama was ever accused of violating the constitution. The answer is yes and one example (of many) is when he extrajudicially killed American citizens. You can be mad at reality though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[url]

Anonymous wrote:The seer of white, middle aged, UMC liberal women has spoken.

When you get mad at derision toward white men pushing younger males to the right, know that derision toward women is pushing younger women to the left, statistically far more than men are moving to the right.

Who cares? They are girls and cant do jack sh*t. Isnt that what all their anger is about?

What exactly is this "sh-t" that girls can't do?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The seer of white, middle aged, UMC liberal women has spoken.

She actually isn't liberal. She's a historian.

Academics are well known for their balanced approach to political issues.

I know that a lot of folks took the shortest of buses to school…but there isn’t an approach. There aren’t liberal branches of mathematics. People become experts in their fields and they share their expertise through teaching or practicing in their field. We have morons doubting science all of the time…always some stupid conspiracy or bias.

You know the saying, reality has a liberal bias.

Your crass, cruel attitude is an embarrassment to everyone in your life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The seer of white, middle aged, UMC liberal women has spoken.

She actually isn't liberal. She's a historian.

Academics are well known for their balanced approach to political issues.

I know that a lot of folks took the shortest of buses to school…but there isn’t an approach. There aren’t liberal branches of mathematics. People become experts in their fields and they share their expertise through teaching or practicing in their field. We have morons doubting science all of the time…always some stupid conspiracy or bias.

You know the saying, reality has a liberal bias.

Your crass, cruel attitude is an embarrassment to everyone in your life.

You sound like you need a hug. Sending you one virtually.