So have all military orders been lawful?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Obama drone bombing of innocents, was that legal?

Look if you’re so concerned pressure your rep to repeal patriot act.

Obama got plenty of heat from Democrats over that, but he argued that the statute pertaining to terrorism related to 9-11 covered it. Nobody in this administration has actually said what law gives the US the authority to, as Trump said earlier "just kill people."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obama drone bombing of innocents, was that legal?

Look if you’re so concerned pressure your rep to repeal patriot act.

I have serious issues with Obama's use of drones. But any legal and collateral damage ethical questions in Obama's case pale in comparison to the constant disregard for the law during this administration.

No actually, they don't.

The president is acting lawfully. Don't like it, too bad.

Cool. Now point to the statute. Don't forget that any action of war has to be under article I (not article II) or else a statute.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obama drone bombing of innocents, was that legal?

Look if you’re so concerned pressure your rep to repeal patriot act.

I have serious issues with Obama's use of drones. But any legal and collateral damage ethical questions in Obama's case pale in comparison to the constant disregard for the law during this administration.

No actually, they don't.

The president is acting lawfully. Don't like it, too bad.

Cool. Now point to the statute. Don't forget that any action of war has to be under article I (not article II) or else a statute.

WRONG.

[Anonymous]

Ratko Mladic killed 8,000 people and was found guilty and serving life in prison. A mass murderer.

Khalid Sheikh Mohammad planned September 11th and is responsible with 35 others of killing 3,000 of our people.

The punishment seems underwhelming.

You think I want to leave any decisions to the judicial system? No. Narco terrorists.... vaporize them and show the video everywhere and keep doing it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ratko Mladic killed 8,000 people and was found guilty and serving life in prison. A mass murderer.

Khalid Sheikh Mohammad planned September 11th and is responsible with 35 others of killing 3,000 of our people.

The punishment seems underwhelming.

You think I want to leave any decisions to the judicial system? No. Narco terrorists.... vaporize them and show the video everywhere and keep doing it.

BTW, KSM is still sitting comfy in prison 25 years later. Very underwhelming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do republicans believe that the orders in Mei Lai were legal? That the orders from
Hitler to mass murder Jews legal? Was blindingly following Pol Pot the right thing to do?

Is the legal defense “I was following orders” hold up in court for military personnel?

How does your conscience hold up when you slaughter innocent children and women because your commander and chief said so?

^^ Same people who in the early 2000s argued that hell no, they wouldn't torture a person even if they knew where a nuke in a large city was about to go off.

Ignore the foolish.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are saying they will decide what is lawful and what is not lawful, so members of the military should just resist all Trump orders just in case.

Go back to Fox.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The orders to sink civilian boats is certainly not lawful. That is why there were high level resignations over them.

Narco terrorist boats*

What the f is a narco terrorist? It has no legal definition. It is just a made up term.

Let’s say the fishing boats were transporting drugs(this is a huge leap). The US military can not target and killing civilians who pose no threat to the US when we are at war. It is a war crime. We are not at war. This makes it murder.

There is no debating this. Blowing up the fishing boats was an illegal order. Everyone in the COC is liable and there is no statute of limitations on murder.

Have you heard of the patriot act and how it classifies terrorists?

Nope. It does not do that. Narco terrorist is a made up word with no legal definition. My god you people are stupid and amoral.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Go after Kelly, Slotkin and the other 4.

18 USC 1381
18 USC 2387

Are you suggesting that the Secretary of War Crimes could actually go after them? That temper tantrum’s kind of died out.

Ooo, I see what you did there. Very clever.

So far, the review has not led to a recall, charges, or a court-martial. It is still just an administrative step that the Pentagon is allowed to take. Call it a temper tantrum if you like - but Secretary Hegseth has the authority. Sen. Kelly should have chosen his words more carefully, or better yet, declined to participate in the video because he's still subject to the UCMJ.

What about his words do you find illegal?

What I think doesn't matter. It's up to the Department of War and the UCMJ. You questioned the legitimacy of the action to investigate Sen. Kelly. It's legitimate. He can have his day in court.

So can all these people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The orders to sink civilian boats is certainly not lawful. That is why there were high level resignations over them.

Narco terrorist boats*

What the f is a narco terrorist? It has no legal definition. It is just a made up term.

Let’s say the fishing boats were transporting drugs(this is a huge leap). The US military can not target and killing civilians who pose no threat to the US when we are at war. It is a war crime. We are not at war. This makes it murder.

There is no debating this. Blowing up the fishing boats was an illegal order. Everyone in the COC is liable and there is no statute of limitations on murder.

Have you heard of the patriot act and how it classifies terrorists?

Nope. It does not do that. Narco terrorist is a made up word with no legal definition. My god you people are stupid and amoral.

Democrats do anything to not address real issues. All they do is change the language to make it impossible for communities to help themselves.

Narco terrorist is still a terrorist. And trying to dismiss it and then insult Internet strangers doesn’t change that fact.

Drug cartel are terrorists. And any defense of them is supporting terrorism, sex trafficking and continued drug addiction of their communities.


I just don’t think the DNC care about people. They just want dependents aka slaves.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

🤔