Anyone who says something like this on DCUM is too stupid to be taken seriously. |
Well then you would use them and not claim you are uncomfortable…like tons of single women of all ages. |
Honestly it needs to be 65 in the US. Americans have terrible hand/eye cordination. |
Your misunderstanding of statistics is an issue. Please censor yourself (aka, “take away the keys”!). |
|
If you are referencing the statistics about which age group has the most accidents, please note that as many have said, those numbers mean nothing without knowing how many total drivers are in each group.
|
The statistics referenced throughout this thread largely have come from the federal government and insurance industry. If you have other (non-anecdotal) data that supports your multiple threads consistently demanding elderly drivers stop driving and encouraging adult children to illegally take their parents’ car keys away, then please share it. |
| No one is saying that those numbers are incorrect. The problem is that they don’t say how many accidents each age group has out of how many drivers for that age group. For example, 10 accidents out of a group of 20 drivers doesn’t mean the same thing as 10 accidents out of a group of 50 drivers. It’s not an equal comparison. So those statistics don’t mean anything. |
They are part of the underlying data that influence insurance rates and government safety recommendations, including testing. Research for now still generally indicates that risk is higher for young people. After the age of 75, the risk begins to increase, though higher fatality rates may be more correlated with frailty, from age. From the National Safety Council’s 2023 data focused on driver age (more data and graphics at the link): “The number of crashes by driver age varies greatly. Some age groups are over-represented in crashes. Sixteen- to 19-year-olds represent 3.7% of licensed drivers, but account for 8.7% of drivers in all crashes and 6.5% of drivers in fatal crashes. Other age groups are under-represented. For example, drivers 65 to 74 account for 13.5% of licensed drivers, but represent only 7.3% of drivers in all crashes and 8.8% of drivers in fatal crashes. The overall crash rate per 100,000 licensed drivers steadily decreases as driver age increases. The same trend is generally true regarding the fatal crash rate, with the exception of an increase among 75 and older drivers.” https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/motor-vehicle/overview/age-of-driver/ |
|
Here is from Senior Living -
“Premiums rise for many older adults, particularly those over the age of 74, because they are more likely to have vision and hearing impairments, cognitive decline, and slowed reflexes, despite being the demographic least likely to purposefully engage in risky driving behaviors.” Less likely to purposefully engage in risky driving behaviors BUT have vision and hearing impairments - cognitive decline - slowed reflexes. Honestly nothing will come of this from this message board except MAYBE some senior is reading this and thinking to themselves maybe it’s time for me to accept that it’s time to stop. Maybe I should consider everyone my impairments affect when I decide my desires are more important than their safety. Doubtful but maybe! And obviously not every senior. |
| Also you could say that choosing to drive when you have impaired vision, hearing, cognition, and reflexes IS the choice to purposefully engage in risky driving behavior. |
This involves your parents’ cooperation going to the doctor to have these things checked. A lot of people won’t do that. You seem naive as to what you can control. These are independent adults. |
Also from the article you’re quoting:
Again, their collective driving record still isn’t as risky in some respects as the cohorts of younger people. Anecdotes and ageism aren’t good reasons to collectively pull people’s licenses or demand they forfeit them. |
| No one suggested collectively pulling people’s licenses. It’s fascinating to me that anyone would object to mandatory testing though once we all reach a certain age. If you’re fine to drive, you will pass. If you’re not fine to drive, wouldn’t you like to know that before you kill someone?? |
Yup. OP, have you yourself talked a parent out of riving? My dad should have stopped driving around 75 or so. His neurologist insisted he stop driving around 81 and that is when he stopped. His three children tried many times before that. |
Feel free to walk these back at any time: “Elderly Drivers - Please Stop Driving.” “Dear Boomers - Please stop driving before you kill someone or damage even more property by ‘accidentally’ driving into someone’s home or business - which seems to happen all the time without repercussions. This is willful negligence on your part and not an accident. Your adult children should NOT be in the position of ‘asking’ you to stop driving. Nor should an accident be the reason you stop. People are living much longer than the driving laws anticipated when they were written. Continuing to drive is selfish and dangerous, and unnecessary now that there are ride share apps and easy cab booking. Signed, Literally everyone who has to share the road with you.” |