Breaking! Hunter exposes Epstein-gate in new video

[Anonymous]

She's all bark and no bite. She would not want this to go to discovery. His defense is that it's not slander if it's the truth. He was quoting Michael Wolf who has Epstein on tape. Do they want to play those recordings in court???

Stupid Melania. Bravado only gets you so far. Stop playing Donald's unintelligent bully games.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone ever asked how Trump and Melania met? That’s a fairly common question to ask famous people in interviews.

Asked. And answered.

"At the time Donald Trump was ready to go public that he was dating the future first lady, he told the New York Post that it was Paolo Zampolli who introduced them, according to NewsNation’s Paula Froelich, who was in the room at the time the call came in."

https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/trump-introduced-melania-hunter-biden/

Genuinely curious here.

What is defamatory about saying Melania was introduced by Epstein to Trump? Yes, Epstein is now notorious, but there are many photos of them together. So where’s the defamation?

Because it implies that she’s a prostitute.

[Anonymous]

The man is back on that stuff (if he ever stopped using crack, cocaine, and meth in the first place). Are we really pretending we don't see that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone ever asked how Trump and Melania met? That’s a fairly common question to ask famous people in interviews.

Asked. And answered.

"At the time Donald Trump was ready to go public that he was dating the future first lady, he told the New York Post that it was Paolo Zampolli who introduced them, according to NewsNation’s Paula Froelich, who was in the room at the time the call came in."

https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/trump-introduced-melania-hunter-biden/

Genuinely curious here.

What is defamatory about saying Melania was introduced by Epstein to Trump? Yes, Epstein is now notorious, but there are many photos of them together. So where’s the defamation?

Because it implies that she’s a prostitute.

How is it defamation or impacting her reputation if most people already believe or assume this? I mean come on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone ever asked how Trump and Melania met? That’s a fairly common question to ask famous people in interviews.

Asked. And answered.

"At the time Donald Trump was ready to go public that he was dating the future first lady, he told the New York Post that it was Paolo Zampolli who introduced them, according to NewsNation’s Paula Froelich, who was in the room at the time the call came in."

https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/trump-introduced-melania-hunter-biden/

Genuinely curious here.

What is defamatory about saying Melania was introduced by Epstein to Trump? Yes, Epstein is now notorious, but there are many photos of them together. So where’s the defamation?

Because it implies that she’s a prostitute.

We all know that she was a prostitute. That is a no brainer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone ever asked how Trump and Melania met? That’s a fairly common question to ask famous people in interviews.

Asked. And answered.

"At the time Donald Trump was ready to go public that he was dating the future first lady, he told the New York Post that it was Paolo Zampolli who introduced them, according to NewsNation’s Paula Froelich, who was in the room at the time the call came in."

https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/trump-introduced-melania-hunter-biden/

Zampolli ran ID Models and he, Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were good friends and ran in the same social and business circles.

+1 Zampolli, Epstein and Trump all ran modeling agencies that were importing underaged girls and young women from Eastern Europe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The man is back on that stuff (if he ever stopped using crack, cocaine, and meth in the first place). Are we really pretending we don't see that?

what is your point? not even addressing the credence of the statement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope Melania sues so everything came come under scrutiny.

She cannot afford discovery.

He would have to prove Epstein introduced her to Trump. No way he can do that.

No he most certainly does not need to prove that.

If he can weasel out of it by saying he was just repeating what someone else said. If not, then he’s liable for defamation unless he can prove that what he said is true.

Nope. You are wrong on that too. She has to prove that a) it was false; and b) he made the statement with actual malice.

Doesn’t she have to prove that he reasonably should have known that what he said was false? Since there has been reporting that Epstein introduced them, there’s no way to prove that it’s unreasonable for Hunter to have known that wasn’t true.

[Anonymous]

That’s the Trump M.O. Sue people for defamation for telling the truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's all bark and no bite. She would not want this to go to discovery. His defense is that it's not slander if it's the truth. He was quoting Michael Wolf who has Epstein on tape. Do they want to play those recordings in court???

Stupid Melania. Bravado only gets you so far. Stop playing Donald's unintelligent bully games.

Trump sued NYT for the story about his taxes, and then lost and had to pay them $$ for legal fees.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67964672

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/12/trump-ordered-to-pay-new-york-times-reporters-over-lawsuit.html

Melania did, however, successfully sue the Daily Mail for calling her a prostitute. But, this lawsuit by her could cause DJT a headache because of what might be found in discovery. This lawsuit will definitely not make the Epstein file go away.

This was a smart PR move by Hunter, and I loathe him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The man is back on that stuff (if he ever stopped using crack, cocaine, and meth in the first place). Are we really pretending we don't see that?

Even if he is, is what he said a complete lie?

She sold her body to make money. Her so called modeling pictures are no better than softcore porn.

This needs investigating. Release the Epstein files.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The man is back on that stuff (if he ever stopped using crack, cocaine, and meth in the first place). Are we really pretending we don't see that?

what is your point? not even addressing the credence of the statement.

Deflect and distract. Their playbook is old and ragged.

It’s like them attacking the DC mayor for sending her kid to camp, inventing some bizarre unrelated nonsense in an attempt to falsely discredit the message via the messenger.

It’s sad and boring.