US main stream media is biased towards Israel. True or false? Why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:True

Agree true, but I genuinely do not understand why.

I know AIPAC and other Israel/zionist lobbies buy politicians, and so maybe it is all about money. And the contractors that profit after wars we get in for Israel. But I genuinely do not understand why. It boggles my mind why we do so much for Israel, when they cost us so much.

You say you don't understand why but yet you clearly understand the problem with the influence of money in politics. Yes, it is all about the money.

Billions of dollars of taxpayer money invested in Israel in exchange for millions of dollars donated to fund political campaigns is very much so a bargain few American politicians can deny.

This influence of money in politics problem is a problem that must be fixed and can only be fixed with the cooperation of a large majority of Americans working together in unison. Probably ain't happening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who exactly are the power elites at AIPAC orchestrating everything?

The top 15 on this list is a good starting point.
https://www.trackaipac.com/donors

[Anonymous]

And like clockwork, NYT runs a long personalized story on an Israeli hostage who is starving. Far less often do you see that sort of highly personalized sympathetic coverage for the other side.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/02/world/europe/new-hostage-videos-sow-fear-and-horror-in-israel.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And like clockwork, NYT runs a long personalized story on an Israeli hostage who is starving. Far less often do you see that sort of highly personalized sympathetic coverage for the other side.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/02/world/europe/new-hostage-videos-sow-fear-and-horror-in-israel.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Where would the food come from to feed hostages exactly? Israel has been food into Gaza. If Gaza citizens are starving, do you really think they would take any little food they have and give it to hostages.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And like clockwork, NYT runs a long personalized story on an Israeli hostage who is starving. Far less often do you see that sort of highly personalized sympathetic coverage for the other side.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/02/world/europe/new-hostage-videos-sow-fear-and-horror-in-israel.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Meanwhile, the Israeli government said that getting the hostages returned was not a priority. At least Hamas was willing to negotiate. Netanyahu doesn't give a shit about the hostages. Any non-dimwit knows this was never about the hostages. They're collateral damage for the plan to "cleanse" Gaza, which was so obviously the plan all along.

[Anonymous]

Netanyahu is all for depopulation, even for his own on 10/7.

[Anonymous]

Zionist. Drink!

[Anonymous]

https://theintercept.com/2025/08/01/awdah-hathaleen-killed-settler-yinon-levi/

Another disturbing story

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Those “innocents” voted in terrorists that tortured and murdered innocent people first. Terrorists that they’re still supporting today. Why did you leave that part out?

DP

Wow, you managed to get so little right in such a short post.

The people are innocent? 1/3 were security / IDF personnel, which obviously made them fair game by the rules Israel plays under. And then if you apply the 2 innocents for every 1 military target math that Zionists insist is acceptable in Gaza, the other 2/3 killed on 10/6 or 10/7 or whatever were just unfortunate side effects of a conflict Israel started. Just part of the equation.

And then the voting part? Are you intentionally ignoring the fact that over 80% of those slice in Gaza today have never once voted for Hamas (and over 2/3 have never been permitted to vote at all), or are you just an ignoramus?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There’s a post on the NYT but what about other media in the US?

True.

I’m not talking about big statements in one direction, but more subtle coverage. This has impact, however.

Examples I’ve noticed.
Very limited photos of Israel’s atrocities.
Frequent personal stories and photos of Israeli and Jewish victims, with very limited ones about Palestinians
Use of passive voice when describing atrocities
Referral to the conflict as a ‘war’ (implies equality) ‘with Hamas’- as if Israel is fighting with Hamas, and not slaughtering innocents

I’ve been listening to public radio the last two days and even they do this -
1. A long personal piece yesterday on an iraqi Jew who was forced to leave Iraq in 1969.
2. Segment from someone arguing that Gaza is not a genocide, and that plenty of food has been delivered.
3. References to the ‘war against Hamas’
4. Passive voice ‘gazans are suffering hunger’. Not ‘Israel is starving Palestinians’

Check out how many Democrat politicians and officials are married to people working in media.

[Anonymous]

Israel's strongest propaganda weapons are western governments, the western press, legions of paid trolls, and an extremely powerful lobby.

Palestine's strongest propaganda weapons are Israel's actions, raw video footage, facts, journalism, and the "translate from Hebrew" button.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And like clockwork, NYT runs a long personalized story on an Israeli hostage who is starving. Far less often do you see that sort of highly personalized sympathetic coverage for the other side.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/02/world/europe/new-hostage-videos-sow-fear-and-horror-in-israel.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

An Israeli hostage is starving because of Israel. They are Gazan citizens for right now too. israel doesn’t care. All Gazans must die is their mantra including hostages if it comes to that

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This all started before October 7.
Yasser Arafat was a horrible leader.
https://www.fdd.org/analysis/op_eds/2024/11/17/yasser-arafats-legacy-the-death-of-palestinian-statehood/

Hamas agrees with you that Yasser Arafat was a horrible leader. Arafat got caught up in the Egypt camp David accords and wanting a similar fate.

Hamas somehow understood what Arafat didn’t: unlike with Egyptians, there was no point for talks as Palestinians were never at war with Israelis for there to be peace talks. They didn’t have an army.

Hamas understood they needed an army to counter Israel. Arafat did not understand that. For 60 years, Palestinians then only had kids throwing rocks as a weapon.

Hamas rockets upped the ante along with relations with Hezbollah and Iran. Hamas knew Israel would be obsessed with Iran, the strongest in this bunch, that they would ignore attention to Hamas

[Anonymous]

This is what happens when a group of people still intent on practicing Endogamy in 2025.

The result is genetic disorders, social isolation and reinforcement of inequality.