Why is this bad? Most people buy a home when they get engaged or married. Such a weird statement. |
You two have similar finances, no need for prenup. |
| Making marriage transactional, is rarely a good move. |
| Definitely get one. Mine said money/assets held in our own names stayed ours and anything joint would be split 50/50. I was so glad I had that when I found out he was cheating. I walked away with all my rental properties and my retirement accounts. He kept his pension and retirement accounts. We split the equity in our shared home. The whole divorce only cost us $1750, and we split that. |
Meh, I found out the hard way that these rules do not apply in the event one spouse dies. Unless you want your spouse to inherit a portion of your estate in death, get a prenup that clearly outlines what belongs to you. People oddly only prepare for divorce, but not death, and the laws are different if one of you dies. |
When they get married for sure but not when they get engaged. That’s foolish. OP is thinking about a prenup. You can tell they haven’t talked about their finances yet, but he has already purchased a house and put her name on it. Not smart at all. |
Uh, most people DO want their spouse to inherit if they die. How strange that you don’t! |
NO. Most people want their children to inherit when they die. |
ALWAYS. Anyone who balks is a golddigger. |
THIS. I don’t know why anybody would have a problem signing a prenup, unless they are trying to take advantage of their partner. |
Err, NO. If that were true, inheritances would default to the children instead of the surviving spouses by law. |
|
If you are dealing with a second marriage and kids and one partner coming in with a lot more assets than the other, a prenup makes sense.
Here I wouldn't bother. You have more assets, but he has a higher income. If you ask for your assets to be protected, if he's smart he's going to want to keep more of his income to equalize things. I just don't think it's the right mindset to go into these things with. If he was a profligate spender in debt with a choppy work history I would feel differently. |
+1 I like pre nups, but I wouldn't sign it in this case. She wants to protect her assets and then she is going to spend his money during the marriage. And when they get divorced, he's got nothing. No thanks, next. |
No. The law is not the same as what people want. The law defaults to the spouse because it’s the fair thing to do. But most people would still prefer their children to inherit their wealth. Just like the law defaults to splitting assets in a divorce but most people would prefer not to. |
| Did you invest with family money? Or have assets in your name that your parents bought? |