| Absolutely Oxford comma. The lack of precision without it feels risky and the sensation of a breathless run-on is real. |
| An oxford comma is what separates the civilized from the heathens. |
|
Omg - it’s not that deep.
It does not matter. |
| I couldn't care less. |
It does if it is only one sign of a lack of precision that also shows up elsewhere in someone's writing. I teach, and my best writers over the years have been Oxford comma users. When I see a student paper that doesn't use it, I'm on alert for other problems. |
I could. |
So you can’t see problems unless your one nitpick alerts you? Telling on yourself there. |
Lawyers can’t write to save their lives. That’s why judges are constantly reinterpreting laws and contracts. |
My kid isn’t applying for admission to the school she already attends, and that school teaches good writing, not slavish arbitrary rules. |
Does your sixth grader know how to use a semicolon? Maybe she can teach you. |
| Doesn't its use just indicate that you have adopted a set of established rules? For instance, the Chicago Manual of Style, which many college professors will request for papers, requires the use of the serial/Oxfor comman. As a writer and reader, I am just thrown off when writers don't use it. There's almost always no good reason not to use it. |
This. There is just no reason not to use it there. People choose not to use the serial comma because they think it shows some kind of small-minded adherence to arbitrary rules? That is a very strange reason not to write clearly. |
A semicolon connects two thoughts of equal weight, while a colon connects an introductory thought with additional detail or explanation. The use of a colon in the sentence above tells you that the writer sees the second half as additional detail. That is, because a 6th grader knows how to use the comma, using it does not look like a parent edited. |
Okay, but look at the arbitrary rules you followed in your post alone: beginning your sentence with an uppercase letter; ending with a period; using a contraction with an apostrophe; joining two independent clauses with a comma and the coordinating conjunction “and.” Was it slavish to follow those rules? We surely could have understood your meaning if you hadn’t, and great writers have chooses at various points to eschew these rules. What in your opinion makes a particular rule slavish? |
| Strunk and White are laughing at us from beyond. |