Kamala on SNL tonight!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The FTC is looking into how this violated campaign election laws

Why the heck would the Federal Trade Commission care about SNL?

[Anonymous]

She should’ve went on Rogan

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was not a good use of her time to reach undecided voters. I know many independent/ undecided voters in swing states (PA, GA, WI, AZ). None of them watch SNL and ones that hear about things like this later don’t like it.

This kind of reads tone deaf to undecided voters, many people don’t watch SNL. Would have been better going on another show or podcast where undecided or conservatives watch try and plead her case (hopefully talk about policy) to a wide audience. Having a Kumbaya with a select few (not many people watch SNL anymore) of people who are already voting for her is not the way to do it. It is also not the way to solidify her allegedly bringing the country together.

Meh. Independent here. Not an SNL fan at all. However, like an earlier poster, this made me tear up. It’s the hope that maybe we can get the toxicity of Trump out of our body politic and go back normal politicians who may not be perfect but who can laugh at themselves and put some effort in for all Americans.

Priceless.

+1 It made me emotional too. It was such a nice tonic and palate cleanse to Trump's toxic bullying. Harris came across as kind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Like NPR only a few libs watch or listen to SNL.

I don't watch SNL but the clip with Kamala is getting reposted and reshared everywhere. I saw it and loved it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone watch SNL anymore?

Only those with a sense of humor and that lets you out.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was not a good use of her time to reach undecided voters. I know many independent/ undecided voters in swing states (PA, GA, WI, AZ). None of them watch SNL and ones that hear about things like this later don’t like it.

This kind of reads tone deaf to undecided voters, many people don’t watch SNL. Would have been better going on another show or podcast where undecided or conservatives watch try and plead her case (hopefully talk about policy) to a wide audience. Having a Kumbaya with a select few (not many people watch SNL anymore) of people who are already voting for her is not the way to do it. It is also not the way to solidify her allegedly bringing the country together.

Do you think she's going on a news show or a podcast at 11:30pm on Saturday night? It was a perfectly reasonable use of that time slot and not that hard to simply stop in NY on her way between campaign events in NC and GA on Saturday and then WI and MI on Sunday. It's a national audience and allows her to show a different side of her personality. Well worth the stop in NY at a time when few other voters are up or receptive to a campaign argument.

What she needs to show is that she has policy substance, away from skits, teleprompters, and prepared remarks. This does nothing for that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was not a good use of her time to reach undecided voters. I know many independent/ undecided voters in swing states (PA, GA, WI, AZ). None of them watch SNL and ones that hear about things like this later don’t like it.

This kind of reads tone deaf to undecided voters, many people don’t watch SNL. Would have been better going on another show or podcast where undecided or conservatives watch try and plead her case (hopefully talk about policy) to a wide audience. Having a Kumbaya with a select few (not many people watch SNL anymore) of people who are already voting for her is not the way to do it. It is also not the way to solidify her allegedly bringing the country together.

Do you think she's going on a news show or a podcast at 11:30pm on Saturday night? It was a perfectly reasonable use of that time slot and not that hard to simply stop in NY on her way between campaign events in NC and GA on Saturday and then WI and MI on Sunday. It's a national audience and allows her to show a different side of her personality. Well worth the stop in NY at a time when few other voters are up or receptive to a campaign argument.

What she needs to show is that she has policy substance, away from skits, teleprompters, and prepared remarks. This does nothing for that.

You mean like at a debate? Where she wiped the floor with Trump? Or in one of the 400 sit down interviews she's given in the last month? If you want policy and substance she has offered that. This was a 3 minute comedy sketch.

Why did no one respond to Trumps lengthy stunts at McDonalds or with the garbage truck with "he need to show he has policy substance." Oh his Joe Rogan podcast? I mostly just learned about his desire to be a whale psychologist. And I'd rather watch a president give a pre-written speech off a teleprompter that actually makes sense and says something meaningful than watch one "riff" on how the people who set up his mic are stupid and then mime fellatio on the mic stand.

But yes, by all means, let's get mad at Harris for spending a few minutes making jokes with Maya Rudolph between campaing stops

[Anonymous]

Loved it and I felt so happy and hopeful while and after watching it. But now I’m even more feeling dread and nerves remembering the HRC Hallelujah opening. Ugh I just cannot. Cannot. I never want to underestimate how deeply f’d up this country is again.

[Anonymous]

I just watched it. I laughed a few times at several different points. But I don’t get these intense emotions some of you are having. I have not seen SNL years and it was a typical skit. It will do nothing for her campaign or for Trumps in either direction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was not a good use of her time to reach undecided voters. I know many independent/ undecided voters in swing states (PA, GA, WI, AZ). None of them watch SNL and ones that hear about things like this later don’t like it.

This kind of reads tone deaf to undecided voters, many people don’t watch SNL. Would have been better going on another show or podcast where undecided or conservatives watch try and plead her case (hopefully talk about policy) to a wide audience. Having a Kumbaya with a select few (not many people watch SNL anymore) of people who are already voting for her is not the way to do it. It is also not the way to solidify her allegedly bringing the country together.

Do you think she's going on a news show or a podcast at 11:30pm on Saturday night? It was a perfectly reasonable use of that time slot and not that hard to simply stop in NY on her way between campaign events in NC and GA on Saturday and then WI and MI on Sunday. It's a national audience and allows her to show a different side of her personality. Well worth the stop in NY at a time when few other voters are up or receptive to a campaign argument.

What she needs to show is that she has policy substance, away from skits, teleprompters, and prepared remarks. This does nothing for that.

You mean like at a debate? Where she wiped the floor with Trump? Or in one of the 400 sit down interviews she's given in the last month? If you want policy and substance she has offered that. This was a 3 minute comedy sketch.

Why did no one respond to Trumps lengthy stunts at McDonalds or with the garbage truck with "he need to show he has policy substance." Oh his Joe Rogan podcast? I mostly just learned about his desire to be a whale psychologist. And I'd rather watch a president give a pre-written speech off a teleprompter that actually makes sense and says something meaningful than watch one "riff" on how the people who set up his mic are stupid and then mime fellatio on the mic stand.

But yes, by all means, let's get mad at Harris for spending a few minutes making jokes with Maya Rudolph between campaing stops

Debate was prepared remarks, the product of days of preparation. Harris's weak spot in voters' minds is whether she has the substance to lead the US. This doesn't do anything for that. Her target audience now how should be winning over undecideds. This just plays to her base.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just watched it. I laughed a few times at several different points. But I don’t get these intense emotions some of you are having. I have not seen SNL years and it was a typical skit. It will do nothing for her campaign or for Trumps in either direction.

If you don’t get strong emotions in the face of the death of your democracy, then I guess I just got nothing for ya

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just watched it. I laughed a few times at several different points. But I don’t get these intense emotions some of you are having. I have not seen SNL years and it was a typical skit. It will do nothing for her campaign or for Trumps in either direction.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She should’ve went on Rogan

You should have stayed in school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was not a good use of her time to reach undecided voters. I know many independent/ undecided voters in swing states (PA, GA, WI, AZ). None of them watch SNL and ones that hear about things like this later don’t like it.

This kind of reads tone deaf to undecided voters, many people don’t watch SNL. Would have been better going on another show or podcast where undecided or conservatives watch try and plead her case (hopefully talk about policy) to a wide audience. Having a Kumbaya with a select few (not many people watch SNL anymore) of people who are already voting for her is not the way to do it. It is also not the way to solidify her allegedly bringing the country together.

Do you think she's going on a news show or a podcast at 11:30pm on Saturday night? It was a perfectly reasonable use of that time slot and not that hard to simply stop in NY on her way between campaign events in NC and GA on Saturday and then WI and MI on Sunday. It's a national audience and allows her to show a different side of her personality. Well worth the stop in NY at a time when few other voters are up or receptive to a campaign argument.

What she needs to show is that she has policy substance, away from skits, teleprompters, and prepared remarks. This does nothing for that.

She has. compare her 82+ pages of detailed policy agenda to the blathering that her opponent does. If this is your concern than you are not a serious voter.