all rooted in racism and they still believe "those" people can't possibly govern themselves. |
*shouldn't get to govern themselves |
|
On the other hand, they are always revving up to try and make our town worse.
For that matter they make everyone else's town suck too! |
Self governance would be great, but DC has demonstrated time and again that it is not capable of self governance. This is in part because DC is a one-party town, so there is no natural check to the worst behaviors of the governing party. DC absolutely needs some sort of outside force to achieve any sort of sanity. Give DC more control over itself in its current state, and it will descend into madness that much quicker. |
I'm from DC and because I'm from DC and got to see a succession of governance...I've always been against statehood. We had one shining light, Tony Williams, and were hyper critical of him because he was a moderate wonk and not a flaming loon. But anything good in this city dates to him. I don't know that Congressional Control can do better -- I'd like specific examples--but I do not want statehood because I'm glad Congress can intervene on specific things when they are out of hand. May they please recriminalize MJ! What a bane that has become. |
| I was all for statehood for about a decade. Then DC woke and destroyed itself. Obviously it needs a babysitter after the mess it has made recently. |
another self-hating purported resident of DC |
They do have a small stake in DC though. R lawmakers have mistresses in DC and extra traffic adds time to those visits. A few of them have been carjacked as well |
Give some examples of how D.C. has demonstrated that time and again, that it is "not capable of self governance." "Elected officials make decisions I disagree with" does not count. |
We generally consider children capable of self-governance when they stop making decisions that harm themselves and others. Additionally, the ability to accept responsibility when things go wrong, and correct behavior are hallmarks of being ready for self-governance. So let's just take crime for example. Raising the age of childhood to 26, hobbling the police, no-papering anyone actually arrested, shaming anyone who actually cares about crime, denying there was a problem and then trying to blame anyone but themselves for the problem seems pretty governance-incapable to me. What do you think? |
Who's "we" in this sentence? In the US I live in, you're an adult at age 18, regardless of others' opinions about your decision-making capabilities. |
Go give an 18 year old a beer then, if you're under 26 you might not even get in trouble for it. |
House GOP doesn't care about people who live in DC. They have open disdain for us. |
Tell me you weren't around when Marion Barry was in charge without telling you weren't around when Marion Barry was in charge. What a ridiculous statement. I am no apologist for Bowser, but to compare her with the incompetence and corruption of Barry is absurd. |
If you want to define adult as being of legal drinking age - which would be weird when we're talking about self-governance, not alcohol, but ok - then it's the same, only 21 instead of 18. Either way, people are adults with or without your approval. |