Life and Murder of Nicole Brown Simpson

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochran was a brilliant attorney who did his job very well. You are such a hater.

But his job was to let a man who murdered the mother of his children, and an innocent stranger get away with that crime. And he played the race card to do it. They even told OJ not to take his arthritis medication so the gloves would not fit.

Would you post that Hitler did his job well?

I'm sure you think the NY jury was wrong as well. You either believe in jury verdicts in the last thirty years, or you don't.

Nope. Over the past 30 years, many juries have done their jobs well, but not all by any means. This jury and both prosecutors and defense attorneys in this trial will live on in infamy, just like OJ.

You can't pick and choose, Donald

You can't change Johnny Cochran's infamous legacy.

Johnny Cochrane was a top, top lawyer. His legacy is good. Blame Fuhrman for being a racist. A racist who after his career with the LAPD was over, was still able to land gigs with Fox News. But then again, I guess that wouldn't fit your narrative would it?

Your narrative is a fairytale. Mark Fuhrman being a despicable racist doesn't change Johnny Cochran's actions and legacy. You can think otherwise all you want.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:has anyone watched this series? her parents seem...very forgiving of OJ. it's bizarre.

Not bizarre at all when you realize OJ sent them into early retirement . They told Nicole to go back after he hit her. Her family including these sisters were all bummed she divorced the gravy train

Gross

[Anonymous]

I wonder if this doc was meant to be released while OJ was still alive?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:has anyone watched this series? her parents seem...very forgiving of OJ. it's bizarre.

Not bizarre at all when you realize OJ sent them into early retirement . They told Nicole to go back after he hit her. Her family including these sisters were all bummed she divorced the gravy train

Gross

It’s the truth. The Brown family should’ve been more proactive against abuse when Nicole was alive

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For his role in that acquitral, don't know how Johnny Cochran slept at night.

I am certain that he slept well because he won the case of the century.

If one has no conscience, sure.

Cochran didn’t believe he did it. He believed a Colombian neck tie / drug deal happened .

I think maybe Kardashian and Shapiro was troubled by the case but Def not Cochran or F Lee Bailey.

Cochran knew he did it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For his role in that acquitral, don't know how Johnny Cochran slept at night.

I am certain that he slept well because he won the case of the century.

If one has no conscience, sure.

Cochran didn’t believe he did it. He believed a Colombian neck tie / drug deal happened .

I think maybe Kardashian and Shapiro was troubled by the case but Def not Cochran or F Lee Bailey.

Cochran knew he did it.

No he didn’t. The defense team itself didn’t get along with each other because some thought he did (Shapiro, Kardashian) and others didn’t think he did (F Lee Bailey, Cochran, Dershowitz). The attorneys weren’t even speaking to each other by the time of the verdict. The tension was visible.

Similarly, the Goldmans and Browns hated each other and weren’t speaking by the time the verdict came out.

There was so much behind the scenes drama that was not talked about .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochran was a brilliant attorney who did his job very well. You are such a hater.

But his job was to let a man who murdered the mother of his children, and an innocent stranger get away with that crime. And he played the race card to do it. They even told OJ not to take his arthritis medication so the gloves would not fit.

Would you post that Hitler did his job well?

I'm sure you think the NY jury was wrong as well. You either believe in jury verdicts in the last thirty years, or you don't.

Nope. Over the past 30 years, many juries have done their jobs well, but not all by any means. This jury and both prosecutors and defense attorneys in this trial will live on in infamy, just like OJ.

You can't pick and choose, Donald

You can't change Johnny Cochran's infamous legacy.

You sound angry. If it doesn’t fit you must acquit. On a different note, I hope you’re never in need of a defense attorney. Just plead guilty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochran was a brilliant attorney who did his job very well. You are such a hater.

But his job was to let a man who murdered the mother of his children, and an innocent stranger get away with that crime. And he played the race card to do it. They even told OJ not to take his arthritis medication so the gloves would not fit.

Would you post that Hitler did his job well?

I'm sure you think the NY jury was wrong as well. You either believe in jury verdicts in the last thirty years, or you don't.

Nope. Over the past 30 years, many juries have done their jobs well, but not all by any means. This jury and both prosecutors and defense attorneys in this trial will live on in infamy, just like OJ.

You can't pick and choose, Donald

You can't change Johnny Cochran's infamous legacy.

F Lee Bialy, Rob Kardashian, Gerald Helmand, Alan Dershowitz, Barry Scheck, Peter Neufeld, and Robert Shapiro all white men, and you pick the one Black man to single out. Heifers need to just take off their white hoods because it’s slipping and showing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if this doc was meant to be released while OJ was still alive?

When the sisters were on Today, they talked about the timing of OJ’s death and said that the timing had nothing to do with OJ and everything to do with when they were finally ready to tell Nicole’s story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if this doc was meant to be released while OJ was still alive?

When the sisters were on Today, they talked about the timing of OJ’s death and said that the timing had nothing to do with OJ and everything to do with when they were finally ready to tell Nicole’s story.

It’s likely the timing relates to 30th death anniversary which is in a few days . I believe them. OJ dying probably gives them some relief but frankly who I really want to hear from are Nicole Simpsons children . What was life like between both families? What do they recall about their mom? The case? Do they think their dad did it? What did he tell them as he died?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochran was a brilliant attorney who did his job very well. You are such a hater.

But his job was to let a man who murdered the mother of his children, and an innocent stranger get away with that crime. And he played the race card to do it. They even told OJ not to take his arthritis medication so the gloves would not fit.

Would you post that Hitler did his job well?

I'm sure you think the NY jury was wrong as well. You either believe in jury verdicts in the last thirty years, or you don't.

Nope. Over the past 30 years, many juries have done their jobs well, but not all by any means. This jury and both prosecutors and defense attorneys in this trial will live on in infamy, just like OJ.

You can't pick and choose, Donald

You can't change Johnny Cochran's infamous legacy.

F Lee Bialy, Rob Kardashian, Gerald Helmand, Alan Dershowitz, Barry Scheck, Peter Neufeld, and Robert Shapiro all white men, and you pick the one Black man to single out. Heifers need to just take off their white hoods because it’s slipping and showing.

When the case was brought to downtown LA, Cochran was brought in because the jury was predominantly black, but the prosecution also had Darden but he failed to connect or explain things reasonably. Marcia Clark prosecuted lots of domestic violence cases in the past so she had a special focus on that which is understandable but it was to a detriment of the case. The defense focused solely on the evidence and the case and also provided reasonable doubt about the cops’ investigation and practices with evidence and blood handling. They provided enough reasonable doubt that Oj couldn’t practically decapitate two people and leave without a bloodbath in his white Bronco . The 1/8 of a drop of his blood wasn’t even found till after the infamous Bronco chase and after OJ volunteered his blood in jail to help the case. The LAPD really botched the investigation. Furhman shouldn’t have Been made the lead. That was his first homicide case. The most famous double homicide case and they give it to a noob? The city of LA failed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember the one of the jurors recently stayed that she knew he did it, they all did, but they were getting revenge for the Rodney King stuff.

Pathetic.

This has been stated often, but nobody has been able to show the tape of this statement. Another false rumor based on lies. Now that's pathetic.

Perhaps read at least the most recent page or two before asserting this. Here’s the link that was a bit upthread from when you posted:
https://www.thewrap.com/oj-simpson-juror-not-guilty-verdict-was-payback-for-rodney-king/

[Anonymous]

^ this is the link of the video of juror Carrie Bess, saying the OJ verdict was just retaliation for the Rodney King stuff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochran was a brilliant attorney who did his job very well. You are such a hater.

But his job was to let a man who murdered the mother of his children, and an innocent stranger get away with that crime. And he played the race card to do it. They even told OJ not to take his arthritis medication so the gloves would not fit.

Would you post that Hitler did his job well?

I'm sure you think the NY jury was wrong as well. You either believe in jury verdicts in the last thirty years, or you don't.

Nope. Over the past 30 years, many juries have done their jobs well, but not all by any means. This jury and both prosecutors and defense attorneys in this trial will live on in infamy, just like OJ.

You can't pick and choose, Donald

You can't change Johnny Cochran's infamous legacy.

Johnny Cochrane was a top, top lawyer. His legacy is good. Blame Fuhrman for being a racist. A racist who after his career with the LAPD was over, was still able to land gigs with Fox News. But then again, I guess that wouldn't fit your narrative would it?

Do you think Cochrane ever used any racial slurs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochran was a brilliant attorney who did his job very well. You are such a hater.

But his job was to let a man who murdered the mother of his children, and an innocent stranger get away with that crime. And he played the race card to do it. They even told OJ not to take his arthritis medication so the gloves would not fit.

Would you post that Hitler did his job well?

I'm sure you think the NY jury was wrong as well. You either believe in jury verdicts in the last thirty years, or you don't.

Nope. Over the past 30 years, many juries have done their jobs well, but not all by any means. This jury and both prosecutors and defense attorneys in this trial will live on in infamy, just like OJ.

You can't pick and choose, Donald

You can't change Johnny Cochran's infamous legacy.

Johnny Cochrane was a top, top lawyer. His legacy is good. Blame Fuhrman for being a racist. A racist who after his career with the LAPD was over, was still able to land gigs with Fox News. But then again, I guess that wouldn't fit your narrative would it?

Do you think Cochrane ever used any racial slurs?

Maybe he did, but he wasn't a cop.Cochrane being racist or using racial slurs is not as bad as a cop being a racist. Cops are supposed to be impartial and treat all races the same. Imagine if a gay hating man was the lead cop on an investigation involving a homosexual man? He wouldn't be the best candidate to involve in the case.