The scale is different. Because of the bump for honors and AP classes. But if you think admissions don’t k wi how to read a Yorktown transcript, I got nothing for you. There is a way to distinguish between a Yorktown kid who has all A’s in a ton of AP classes and one that does not. There are not many kids who get all A’s in all AP classes coming out of the top publics. It just doesn’t happen. And the myth that everyone can retake a test to get an A - also BS. Retest policy means you can bring your score up in FCPS to an 80% max. You are retesting, you are not getting an A. The policy is in place to help kids in danger of failing. Not competing with your private school kid for Harvard. |
Because they scale is not 4.0 for those schools? So you distinguish between the 4.1 and 4.5. Is this that hard for you? |
Agree. Only a couple dozen posted on our public’s instagram. And none of the students who got into top colleges did. |
My kid is at a NYC competitive public. I think the top privates always have an advantage b/c so many talented kids attending the top public schools and the private schools are simply smaller and since schools only take so many kids from one school it makes admissions somewhat harder. That being said, the colleges trust and know that grading is hard (I assume to be honest NYC specialized schools have less grade inflation than top privates) and all the kids take standardized test (don’t know any of kids friends who did not submit). And despite maybe slightly better outcomes from private schools, my kid and her friends are all going to amazing schools. One of her friends going to an in-state public top engineering school but everyone else headed to T25/Top 5 SLAC. I don’t think college outcomes would have been much different for these kids if they had attended a $60k/year private or from their public. They have received also received an amazing education (albeit not personalized but also not coddled which may be a good thing). |
There is a marked difference at the Chicago private high schools this year. It’s noticeably better than last year.
Think the SCOTUS decision helped. |
Why does everyone here claim their child has a 4.0 - 4.5, both private and public? |
The public school kids should be priority in all of the public flagships. These schools were always meant to educate students of families with lower income levels. Why would anyone spend so much on private high school just to end up at a public university? |
To dominate at the public universities and get a better college prep (hence: preparatory schools). The smartest kids in my dorm came out of a dc private at U Michigan. |
Some want single sex education 14-18. Some want a smaller school and class sizes in high school. The goal for many isn’t an Ivy or where they matriculate—but the foundational education. |
Full pay white kids, maybe. Asians don't do privates much. Mostly public HS. |
Supreme Court decision benefitted upper class white kids. |
Do we really think this is true? |
Then you’re really bad at math. |
I think it benefited all wealthy kids. The non-white wealthy kids seem to be doing really well too. May have also benefited rural privileged kids too. |
No. There are too few URMs at highly selective schools to move the needle by screwing them. Statistically meaningless. |