Not my experience at all. |
Students are not the best judge of teachers. Students want likability, fun, and ease. High grades given to students correlate with high evaluation scores. Students often can't tell if a grad student actually knows the material. It's incredulous that many teaching evaluations ask students to rate the competence and knowledge base of the instructor--how would they know if they're being fed BS? Yes, there are excellent graduate students who teach well, but they're inexperienced and cheap labor for the university. With few exceptions, I would strongly encourage high school students to consider SLACs for undergrad where the teaching quality is overall much higher than at a research university. -Tenured prof at R1 |
+1 |
LACs don’t attract the types who only want to do research. |
+10,0000 SLACs offer tremendous value relative to top research universities (where undergrads are generally seen as nothing more than a nuisance to be dealt with). I would definitely not recommend for HS students to come to my own university for their undergrad education. - Another Tenured Prof at R1. |
+2 |
New poster. Not true. Building relationships with professors can help in many fields. It's not just adjuncts who have real-world connections, PP. Source: My recent SLAC graduate whose full professors have been helpful to DC post-graduation with connections and resources for finding jobs and grad programs. (In four years my DC had only two adjuncts as a teacher and zero TAs teaching. Small classes taught by profs were one big reason DC wanted a SLAC, and DC got to know several profs well.) |