Truancy In DC HS Is Shocking - Why No Urgency To Address?!!

[Anonymous]

This is an interesting take

[Anonymous]

It seems the reality is far worse than the numbers reflect. What future will these kids have?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok, I'll be that person.

These are the consequences of prolonged school closures. The truancy rates and the juvenile crime issues.

If we want to address these issues, we need politicians and policy-makers who are willing to come in and say, out loud: We broke trust and destroyed relationships between schools and families during the Covid closures. We abandoned the kids in the district who most desperately need support from the education system. We need a plan that directly addresses this problem and finds a way to get these kids back into classrooms, back connected with the functional, law-abiding aspects of our community. This will likely require direct family intervention that addresses all aspects of the dysfunction that was made much worse during the pandemic -- mental health, substance abuse, domestic violence, and criminality. We need funding to hire more truancy officers, social workers, and family services counselors and we need to start identifying the kids and families who need serious intervention and doing whatever we can to at LEAST return to pre-Covid numbers.

You can't treat a disease when you refuse to name it. This isn't about schools miscategorizing absences. This is about a broken system that wasn't doing great pre-Covid but absolutely collapsed during school closures. We need to repair it.

I am so angry that no one will talk about these issues with the directness and honesty that is needed. Are we still pretending school closures were just inconveniences for rich white people and actually helped poor communities in the city? Really? After the test scores, the truancy rates, and the juvenile crime stats all make it abundantly clear that the opposite is true?

We messed up. Schools should have reopened in July 2020 (yes, July, the push should have been to get in-person summer school for all at risk kids ASAP and then everyone back in August). It's fine to acknowledge people were scared and that a lot of other cities made a similar mistake. But it WAS a mistake. We need to fix it.

This is one of the several reasons why I realized that the activists and progressives on the Council were just posturing, and don't actually believe anything they say. Every time someone says we should lock up the criminals, these people go, no, that's not the answer, we need to provide services to get at the root of the problem.

OK, but the schools are arguably the greatest service that gets provided to these families. It serves as a childcare, it serves as a place where the kids have activities that will keep them away from crime, it serves as a place to feed the kids with free breakfast and lunch, it serves as a place where professionals can check up on the kids. And our elected officials (and most of the activists) were fine with keeping them closed or partially-closed for a year and a half. Robert White was even recently arguing in favor of more closings. When Ferebee tried to have a very limited reopening in the fall of 2020 that would have targeted at risk kids, the Washington Teachers Union had a walkout, and he backed off. And people were fine with this.

So I don't really want to hear these people spread their fact concern about how they want more resources for these kids to address the root cause of these issues. These people are only all to happy to cut the most important resources for these vulnerable families whenever they feel like, with absolutely no self-reflection.

This is such a dumb take. The kids who are truant aren't the kids of people like you. The "broken trust" didn't cause kids 3 grade levels behind to stop coming to school. Go away.

Did you even read the PP? They talk about how a plan to reopen schools just for at risk kids, meaning precisely the population of kids who are truant, was thwarted by a walkout by the WTU.

Do you even realize that it was the schools with the highest numbers of FARMS kids that stayed closed the longest in DC? Schools in Ward 3 and Capitol Hill were able to start offering some form of in-person school for all students by March 2021. The schools with high at-risk percentages might have offered some in person instruction for their neediest students, but if you have a 65% at risk population, this doesn't come close to meeting the needs of these kids. Most students at Title 1 schools in DC did not return to school until August 2021.

When you have a population that is already struggling, and then you take away the ONE resource they feel they can rely on, yes you "break trust." And unlike all the people who vocally argued in favor of keeping school remote, this population doesn't have regular access to internet and quiet, calm indoor spaces in which to do remote school.

I am so tired of people not getting that these problems we are now seeing -- the high truancy rates, especially in middle and high school, the major behavioral problems, and the juvenile crime rates, are ALL related to the fact that many kids in this city were simply left to their own devices for over a year. They did not go to school, not remote school, not in-person school. Many had little to no interaction with adults who offered structure, discipline, or even baseline expectations for behavior. They didn't encounter people who might notice that they seemed hungry, angry, unstable, or unsafe. We're talking about hundred of students in DCPS here. We failed those kids.

And now they are in the wind. They don't come to school, they are not learning, many of them are engaging in everything from petty to violent crime. They will not graduate high school, they will not get jobs, they will not have promising futures. These are kids who were already struggling before Covid and many of them would have gone this route anyway. But we greatly increased the likelihood of this happening and accelerated the process, so instead of it happening when they turned 17 or 19, instead of maybe clinging on long enough to get a high school degree or develop enough academic skills to at least hold down a job, these kids wound up on the street at 12 or 13.

How can you people not see this. Do you honestly think these children successfully attended school on their tablets for a year and a half, dutifully walking over to the public library to use their wifi and do their English and math classes? No, they didn't. The city abandoned them and we are now reaping the consequences of those choices. I understand what the risks would have been to keeping schools open for these students in 2020, and I'm telling you right now it would have been worth it. Masks, testing, outdoor classes, whatever we had to do. It would have been worth it. I don't think we will ever get them back. We're going to be paying of ratios for a generation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is an interesting take

No, the anti-Relay people are the usual suspects who rant about “privatizers” etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok, I'll be that person.

These are the consequences of prolonged school closures. The truancy rates and the juvenile crime issues.

If we want to address these issues, we need politicians and policy-makers who are willing to come in and say, out loud: We broke trust and destroyed relationships between schools and families during the Covid closures. We abandoned the kids in the district who most desperately need support from the education system. We need a plan that directly addresses this problem and finds a way to get these kids back into classrooms, back connected with the functional, law-abiding aspects of our community. This will likely require direct family intervention that addresses all aspects of the dysfunction that was made much worse during the pandemic -- mental health, substance abuse, domestic violence, and criminality. We need funding to hire more truancy officers, social workers, and family services counselors and we need to start identifying the kids and families who need serious intervention and doing whatever we can to at LEAST return to pre-Covid numbers.

You can't treat a disease when you refuse to name it. This isn't about schools miscategorizing absences. This is about a broken system that wasn't doing great pre-Covid but absolutely collapsed during school closures. We need to repair it.

I am so angry that no one will talk about these issues with the directness and honesty that is needed. Are we still pretending school closures were just inconveniences for rich white people and actually helped poor communities in the city? Really? After the test scores, the truancy rates, and the juvenile crime stats all make it abundantly clear that the opposite is true?

We messed up. Schools should have reopened in July 2020 (yes, July, the push should have been to get in-person summer school for all at risk kids ASAP and then everyone back in August). It's fine to acknowledge people were scared and that a lot of other cities made a similar mistake. But it WAS a mistake. We need to fix it.

This is one of the several reasons why I realized that the activists and progressives on the Council were just posturing, and don't actually believe anything they say. Every time someone says we should lock up the criminals, these people go, no, that's not the answer, we need to provide services to get at the root of the problem.

OK, but the schools are arguably the greatest service that gets provided to these families. It serves as a childcare, it serves as a place where the kids have activities that will keep them away from crime, it serves as a place to feed the kids with free breakfast and lunch, it serves as a place where professionals can check up on the kids. And our elected officials (and most of the activists) were fine with keeping them closed or partially-closed for a year and a half. Robert White was even recently arguing in favor of more closings. When Ferebee tried to have a very limited reopening in the fall of 2020 that would have targeted at risk kids, the Washington Teachers Union had a walkout, and he backed off. And people were fine with this.

So I don't really want to hear these people spread their fact concern about how they want more resources for these kids to address the root cause of these issues. These people are only all to happy to cut the most important resources for these vulnerable families whenever they feel like, with absolutely no self-reflection.

This is such a dumb take. The kids who are truant aren't the kids of people like you. The "broken trust" didn't cause kids 3 grade levels behind to stop coming to school. Go away.

Did you even read the PP? They talk about how a plan to reopen schools just for at risk kids, meaning precisely the population of kids who are truant, was thwarted by a walkout by the WTU.

Do you even realize that it was the schools with the highest numbers of FARMS kids that stayed closed the longest in DC? Schools in Ward 3 and Capitol Hill were able to start offering some form of in-person school for all students by March 2021. The schools with high at-risk percentages might have offered some in person instruction for their neediest students, but if you have a 65% at risk population, this doesn't come close to meeting the needs of these kids. Most students at Title 1 schools in DC did not return to school until August 2021.

When you have a population that is already struggling, and then you take away the ONE resource they feel they can rely on, yes you "break trust." And unlike all the people who vocally argued in favor of keeping school remote, this population doesn't have regular access to internet and quiet, calm indoor spaces in which to do remote school.

I am so tired of people not getting that these problems we are now seeing -- the high truancy rates, especially in middle and high school, the major behavioral problems, and the juvenile crime rates, are ALL related to the fact that many kids in this city were simply left to their own devices for over a year. They did not go to school, not remote school, not in-person school. Many had little to no interaction with adults who offered structure, discipline, or even baseline expectations for behavior. They didn't encounter people who might notice that they seemed hungry, angry, unstable, or unsafe. We're talking about hundred of students in DCPS here. We failed those kids.

And now they are in the wind. They don't come to school, they are not learning, many of them are engaging in everything from petty to violent crime. They will not graduate high school, they will not get jobs, they will not have promising futures. These are kids who were already struggling before Covid and many of them would have gone this route anyway. But we greatly increased the likelihood of this happening and accelerated the process, so instead of it happening when they turned 17 or 19, instead of maybe clinging on long enough to get a high school degree or develop enough academic skills to at least hold down a job, these kids wound up on the street at 12 or 13.

How can you people not see this. Do you honestly think these children successfully attended school on their tablets for a year and a half, dutifully walking over to the public library to use their wifi and do their English and math classes? No, they didn't. The city abandoned them and we are now reaping the consequences of those choices. I understand what the risks would have been to keeping schools open for these students in 2020, and I'm telling you right now it would have been worth it. Masks, testing, outdoor classes, whatever we had to do. It would have been worth it. I don't think we will ever get them back. We're going to be paying of ratios for a generation.

What were the comparable truancy rates pre-pandemic?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is an interesting take

Oh you mean if you treat schools like prisons and students like criminals, it does not reduce truancy and juvenile crime? Shocking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok, I'll be that person.

These are the consequences of prolonged school closures. The truancy rates and the juvenile crime issues.

If we want to address these issues, we need politicians and policy-makers who are willing to come in and say, out loud: We broke trust and destroyed relationships between schools and families during the Covid closures. We abandoned the kids in the district who most desperately need support from the education system. We need a plan that directly addresses this problem and finds a way to get these kids back into classrooms, back connected with the functional, law-abiding aspects of our community. This will likely require direct family intervention that addresses all aspects of the dysfunction that was made much worse during the pandemic -- mental health, substance abuse, domestic violence, and criminality. We need funding to hire more truancy officers, social workers, and family services counselors and we need to start identifying the kids and families who need serious intervention and doing whatever we can to at LEAST return to pre-Covid numbers.

You can't treat a disease when you refuse to name it. This isn't about schools miscategorizing absences. This is about a broken system that wasn't doing great pre-Covid but absolutely collapsed during school closures. We need to repair it.

I am so angry that no one will talk about these issues with the directness and honesty that is needed. Are we still pretending school closures were just inconveniences for rich white people and actually helped poor communities in the city? Really? After the test scores, the truancy rates, and the juvenile crime stats all make it abundantly clear that the opposite is true?

We messed up. Schools should have reopened in July 2020 (yes, July, the push should have been to get in-person summer school for all at risk kids ASAP and then everyone back in August). It's fine to acknowledge people were scared and that a lot of other cities made a similar mistake. But it WAS a mistake. We need to fix it.

This is one of the several reasons why I realized that the activists and progressives on the Council were just posturing, and don't actually believe anything they say. Every time someone says we should lock up the criminals, these people go, no, that's not the answer, we need to provide services to get at the root of the problem.

OK, but the schools are arguably the greatest service that gets provided to these families. It serves as a childcare, it serves as a place where the kids have activities that will keep them away from crime, it serves as a place to feed the kids with free breakfast and lunch, it serves as a place where professionals can check up on the kids. And our elected officials (and most of the activists) were fine with keeping them closed or partially-closed for a year and a half. Robert White was even recently arguing in favor of more closings. When Ferebee tried to have a very limited reopening in the fall of 2020 that would have targeted at risk kids, the Washington Teachers Union had a walkout, and he backed off. And people were fine with this.

So I don't really want to hear these people spread their fact concern about how they want more resources for these kids to address the root cause of these issues. These people are only all to happy to cut the most important resources for these vulnerable families whenever they feel like, with absolutely no self-reflection.

This is such a dumb take. The kids who are truant aren't the kids of people like you. The "broken trust" didn't cause kids 3 grade levels behind to stop coming to school. Go away.

Did you even read the PP? They talk about how a plan to reopen schools just for at risk kids, meaning precisely the population of kids who are truant, was thwarted by a walkout by the WTU.

Do you even realize that it was the schools with the highest numbers of FARMS kids that stayed closed the longest in DC? Schools in Ward 3 and Capitol Hill were able to start offering some form of in-person school for all students by March 2021. The schools with high at-risk percentages might have offered some in person instruction for their neediest students, but if you have a 65% at risk population, this doesn't come close to meeting the needs of these kids. Most students at Title 1 schools in DC did not return to school until August 2021.

When you have a population that is already struggling, and then you take away the ONE resource they feel they can rely on, yes you "break trust." And unlike all the people who vocally argued in favor of keeping school remote, this population doesn't have regular access to internet and quiet, calm indoor spaces in which to do remote school.

I am so tired of people not getting that these problems we are now seeing -- the high truancy rates, especially in middle and high school, the major behavioral problems, and the juvenile crime rates, are ALL related to the fact that many kids in this city were simply left to their own devices for over a year. They did not go to school, not remote school, not in-person school. Many had little to no interaction with adults who offered structure, discipline, or even baseline expectations for behavior. They didn't encounter people who might notice that they seemed hungry, angry, unstable, or unsafe. We're talking about hundred of students in DCPS here. We failed those kids.

And now they are in the wind. They don't come to school, they are not learning, many of them are engaging in everything from petty to violent crime. They will not graduate high school, they will not get jobs, they will not have promising futures. These are kids who were already struggling before Covid and many of them would have gone this route anyway. But we greatly increased the likelihood of this happening and accelerated the process, so instead of it happening when they turned 17 or 19, instead of maybe clinging on long enough to get a high school degree or develop enough academic skills to at least hold down a job, these kids wound up on the street at 12 or 13.

How can you people not see this. Do you honestly think these children successfully attended school on their tablets for a year and a half, dutifully walking over to the public library to use their wifi and do their English and math classes? No, they didn't. The city abandoned them and we are now reaping the consequences of those choices. I understand what the risks would have been to keeping schools open for these students in 2020, and I'm telling you right now it would have been worth it. Masks, testing, outdoor classes, whatever we had to do. It would have been worth it. I don't think we will ever get them back. We're going to be paying of ratios for a generation.

What were the comparable truancy rates pre-pandemic?

https://osse.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/osse/publication/attachments/2019-20%20Attendance%20Report.pdf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok, I'll be that person.

These are the consequences of prolonged school closures. The truancy rates and the juvenile crime issues.

If we want to address these issues, we need politicians and policy-makers who are willing to come in and say, out loud: We broke trust and destroyed relationships between schools and families during the Covid closures. We abandoned the kids in the district who most desperately need support from the education system. We need a plan that directly addresses this problem and finds a way to get these kids back into classrooms, back connected with the functional, law-abiding aspects of our community. This will likely require direct family intervention that addresses all aspects of the dysfunction that was made much worse during the pandemic -- mental health, substance abuse, domestic violence, and criminality. We need funding to hire more truancy officers, social workers, and family services counselors and we need to start identifying the kids and families who need serious intervention and doing whatever we can to at LEAST return to pre-Covid numbers.

You can't treat a disease when you refuse to name it. This isn't about schools miscategorizing absences. This is about a broken system that wasn't doing great pre-Covid but absolutely collapsed during school closures. We need to repair it.

I am so angry that no one will talk about these issues with the directness and honesty that is needed. Are we still pretending school closures were just inconveniences for rich white people and actually helped poor communities in the city? Really? After the test scores, the truancy rates, and the juvenile crime stats all make it abundantly clear that the opposite is true?

We messed up. Schools should have reopened in July 2020 (yes, July, the push should have been to get in-person summer school for all at risk kids ASAP and then everyone back in August). It's fine to acknowledge people were scared and that a lot of other cities made a similar mistake. But it WAS a mistake. We need to fix it.

I love people like you who believe there should be no negative repercussions of a global pandemic.
Would you have walked into a school to teach in August 2020 before a vaccine came out? Many people refused to send their kids. By March 2021, yes, I agree that schools should have fully reopened but before that is dicey. Are you going to use the pandemic excuse forever?

Schools were open throughout the south (which DCUM loves to hate on) for in person school and students fared better attending in person school.

Accept that the extensive multi year closures in the DCUM region significantly hurt students. Require attendance and remedial studies to bring students up to where they should be.

Utilize truancy officers. Make the parents of truant children attend parenting classes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is an interesting take

Oh you mean if you treat schools like prisons and students like criminals, it does not reduce truancy and juvenile crime? Shocking.

As far as I can tell, all Relay does is train teachers in basic classroom management skills. Saying that basic discipline is to “treat schools like prisons” is ridiculous hyperbole, especially with teachers complaining at the same time about student behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When you have a population that is already struggling, and then you take away the ONE resource they feel they can rely on, yes you "break trust." And unlike all the people who vocally argued in favor of keeping school remote, this population doesn't have regular access to internet and quiet, calm indoor spaces in which to do remote school.

And often these families don't have two parents who were doing work from home, like many in Ward 3 were. Think of the single-parents whose jobs required them to be in person.

It shows just how out of touch many are here that they're actually trying to argue that poor families were better able to handle the school shutdowns than rich ones. It's astounding that people can argue that these resources are essential for poor students, then immediately turn around and say that poor students don't actually use these resources.

[Anonymous]

What demographics? Asians and Whites? UMC and college educated parents? No? Who cares?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok, I'll be that person.

These are the consequences of prolonged school closures. The truancy rates and the juvenile crime issues.

If we want to address these issues, we need politicians and policy-makers who are willing to come in and say, out loud: We broke trust and destroyed relationships between schools and families during the Covid closures. We abandoned the kids in the district who most desperately need support from the education system. We need a plan that directly addresses this problem and finds a way to get these kids back into classrooms, back connected with the functional, law-abiding aspects of our community. This will likely require direct family intervention that addresses all aspects of the dysfunction that was made much worse during the pandemic -- mental health, substance abuse, domestic violence, and criminality. We need funding to hire more truancy officers, social workers, and family services counselors and we need to start identifying the kids and families who need serious intervention and doing whatever we can to at LEAST return to pre-Covid numbers.

You can't treat a disease when you refuse to name it. This isn't about schools miscategorizing absences. This is about a broken system that wasn't doing great pre-Covid but absolutely collapsed during school closures. We need to repair it.

I am so angry that no one will talk about these issues with the directness and honesty that is needed. Are we still pretending school closures were just inconveniences for rich white people and actually helped poor communities in the city? Really? After the test scores, the truancy rates, and the juvenile crime stats all make it abundantly clear that the opposite is true?

We messed up. Schools should have reopened in July 2020 (yes, July, the push should have been to get in-person summer school for all at risk kids ASAP and then everyone back in August). It's fine to acknowledge people were scared and that a lot of other cities made a similar mistake. But it WAS a mistake. We need to fix it.

This is one of the several reasons why I realized that the activists and progressives on the Council were just posturing, and don't actually believe anything they say. Every time someone says we should lock up the criminals, these people go, no, that's not the answer, we need to provide services to get at the root of the problem.

OK, but the schools are arguably the greatest service that gets provided to these families. It serves as a childcare, it serves as a place where the kids have activities that will keep them away from crime, it serves as a place to feed the kids with free breakfast and lunch, it serves as a place where professionals can check up on the kids. And our elected officials (and most of the activists) were fine with keeping them closed or partially-closed for a year and a half. Robert White was even recently arguing in favor of more closings. When Ferebee tried to have a very limited reopening in the fall of 2020 that would have targeted at risk kids, the Washington Teachers Union had a walkout, and he backed off. And people were fine with this.

So I don't really want to hear these people spread their fact concern about how they want more resources for these kids to address the root cause of these issues. These people are only all to happy to cut the most important resources for these vulnerable families whenever they feel like, with absolutely no self-reflection.

This is such a dumb take. The kids who are truant aren't the kids of people like you. The "broken trust" didn't cause kids 3 grade levels behind to stop coming to school. Go away.

Did you even read the PP? They talk about how a plan to reopen schools just for at risk kids, meaning precisely the population of kids who are truant, was thwarted by a walkout by the WTU.

Do you even realize that it was the schools with the highest numbers of FARMS kids that stayed closed the longest in DC? Schools in Ward 3 and Capitol Hill were able to start offering some form of in-person school for all students by March 2021. The schools with high at-risk percentages might have offered some in person instruction for their neediest students, but if you have a 65% at risk population, this doesn't come close to meeting the needs of these kids. Most students at Title 1 schools in DC did not return to school until August 2021.

When you have a population that is already struggling, and then you take away the ONE resource they feel they can rely on, yes you "break trust." And unlike all the people who vocally argued in favor of keeping school remote, this population doesn't have regular access to internet and quiet, calm indoor spaces in which to do remote school.

I am so tired of people not getting that these problems we are now seeing -- the high truancy rates, especially in middle and high school, the major behavioral problems, and the juvenile crime rates, are ALL related to the fact that many kids in this city were simply left to their own devices for over a year. They did not go to school, not remote school, not in-person school. Many had little to no interaction with adults who offered structure, discipline, or even baseline expectations for behavior. They didn't encounter people who might notice that they seemed hungry, angry, unstable, or unsafe. We're talking about hundred of students in DCPS here. We failed those kids.

And now they are in the wind. They don't come to school, they are not learning, many of them are engaging in everything from petty to violent crime. They will not graduate high school, they will not get jobs, they will not have promising futures. These are kids who were already struggling before Covid and many of them would have gone this route anyway. But we greatly increased the likelihood of this happening and accelerated the process, so instead of it happening when they turned 17 or 19, instead of maybe clinging on long enough to get a high school degree or develop enough academic skills to at least hold down a job, these kids wound up on the street at 12 or 13.

How can you people not see this. Do you honestly think these children successfully attended school on their tablets for a year and a half, dutifully walking over to the public library to use their wifi and do their English and math classes? No, they didn't. The city abandoned them and we are now reaping the consequences of those choices. I understand what the risks would have been to keeping schools open for these students in 2020, and I'm telling you right now it would have been worth it. Masks, testing, outdoor classes, whatever we had to do. It would have been worth it. I don't think we will ever get them back. We're going to be paying off ratios for a generation.

Hah! These kids were cursed from the moment they were conceived by their neglectful parents. I do not understand how the city is to be blamed? Is the suggestion here to keep the schools open for at risk kids so they and their families would have died of COVID and also spread contagion to the rest of the population?

What about the teachers and school staff? Did we want them and their families to die because of at risk kids who are not interested in studying in the first place? Which teacher would have signed up for that?

I am telling you also right now. Do a reverse migration caravan.

[Anonymous]

Definitely a correlation with crime and truancy

[Anonymous]

Whoa. And I thought 33% at our MCPS MS was bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok, I'll be that person.

These are the consequences of prolonged school closures. The truancy rates and the juvenile crime issues.

If we want to address these issues, we need politicians and policy-makers who are willing to come in and say, out loud: We broke trust and destroyed relationships between schools and families during the Covid closures. We abandoned the kids in the district who most desperately need support from the education system. We need a plan that directly addresses this problem and finds a way to get these kids back into classrooms, back connected with the functional, law-abiding aspects of our community. This will likely require direct family intervention that addresses all aspects of the dysfunction that was made much worse during the pandemic -- mental health, substance abuse, domestic violence, and criminality. We need funding to hire more truancy officers, social workers, and family services counselors and we need to start identifying the kids and families who need serious intervention and doing whatever we can to at LEAST return to pre-Covid numbers.

You can't treat a disease when you refuse to name it. This isn't about schools miscategorizing absences. This is about a broken system that wasn't doing great pre-Covid but absolutely collapsed during school closures. We need to repair it.

I am so angry that no one will talk about these issues with the directness and honesty that is needed. Are we still pretending school closures were just inconveniences for rich white people and actually helped poor communities in the city? Really? After the test scores, the truancy rates, and the juvenile crime stats all make it abundantly clear that the opposite is true?

We messed up. Schools should have reopened in July 2020 (yes, July, the push should have been to get in-person summer school for all at risk kids ASAP and then everyone back in August). It's fine to acknowledge people were scared and that a lot of other cities made a similar mistake. But it WAS a mistake. We need to fix it.

This is one of the several reasons why I realized that the activists and progressives on the Council were just posturing, and don't actually believe anything they say. Every time someone says we should lock up the criminals, these people go, no, that's not the answer, we need to provide services to get at the root of the problem.

OK, but the schools are arguably the greatest service that gets provided to these families. It serves as a childcare, it serves as a place where the kids have activities that will keep them away from crime, it serves as a place to feed the kids with free breakfast and lunch, it serves as a place where professionals can check up on the kids. And our elected officials (and most of the activists) were fine with keeping them closed or partially-closed for a year and a half. Robert White was even recently arguing in favor of more closings. When Ferebee tried to have a very limited reopening in the fall of 2020 that would have targeted at risk kids, the Washington Teachers Union had a walkout, and he backed off. And people were fine with this.

So I don't really want to hear these people spread their fact concern about how they want more resources for these kids to address the root cause of these issues. These people are only all to happy to cut the most important resources for these vulnerable families whenever they feel like, with absolutely no self-reflection.

This is such a dumb take. The kids who are truant aren't the kids of people like you. The "broken trust" didn't cause kids 3 grade levels behind to stop coming to school. Go away.

Did you even read the PP? They talk about how a plan to reopen schools just for at risk kids, meaning precisely the population of kids who are truant, was thwarted by a walkout by the WTU.

Do you even realize that it was the schools with the highest numbers of FARMS kids that stayed closed the longest in DC? Schools in Ward 3 and Capitol Hill were able to start offering some form of in-person school for all students by March 2021. The schools with high at-risk percentages might have offered some in person instruction for their neediest students, but if you have a 65% at risk population, this doesn't come close to meeting the needs of these kids. Most students at Title 1 schools in DC did not return to school until August 2021.

When you have a population that is already struggling, and then you take away the ONE resource they feel they can rely on, yes you "break trust." And unlike all the people who vocally argued in favor of keeping school remote, this population doesn't have regular access to internet and quiet, calm indoor spaces in which to do remote school.

I am so tired of people not getting that these problems we are now seeing -- the high truancy rates, especially in middle and high school, the major behavioral problems, and the juvenile crime rates, are ALL related to the fact that many kids in this city were simply left to their own devices for over a year. They did not go to school, not remote school, not in-person school. Many had little to no interaction with adults who offered structure, discipline, or even baseline expectations for behavior. They didn't encounter people who might notice that they seemed hungry, angry, unstable, or unsafe. We're talking about hundred of students in DCPS here. We failed those kids.

And now they are in the wind. They don't come to school, they are not learning, many of them are engaging in everything from petty to violent crime. They will not graduate high school, they will not get jobs, they will not have promising futures. These are kids who were already struggling before Covid and many of them would have gone this route anyway. But we greatly increased the likelihood of this happening and accelerated the process, so instead of it happening when they turned 17 or 19, instead of maybe clinging on long enough to get a high school degree or develop enough academic skills to at least hold down a job, these kids wound up on the street at 12 or 13.

How can you people not see this. Do you honestly think these children successfully attended school on their tablets for a year and a half, dutifully walking over to the public library to use their wifi and do their English and math classes? No, they didn't. The city abandoned them and we are now reaping the consequences of those choices. I understand what the risks would have been to keeping schools open for these students in 2020, and I'm telling you right now it would have been worth it. Masks, testing, outdoor classes, whatever we had to do. It would have been worth it. I don't think we will ever get them back. We're going to be paying of ratios for a generation.

What were the comparable truancy rates pre-pandemic?

https://osse.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/osse/publication/attachments/2019-20%20Attendance%20Report.pdf

Thanks for the link.

Looks like the problem was firmly in place before the pandemic, especially for the schools with the super-high percentages.