+1. UVa is much the same. |
I went to a huge stage flagship and felt like just a number. Many of my professors were more concerned with their next book or research and the TA’s carried most of the load. I feel zero connection to it and don’t donate a penny. However, I donate to the SLACs our kids attended and loved. In hindsight I wish I had gone to one. The point is there is no one size fits all when it comes to college. No matter how much people keep trying to say there is. |
LOL ! Yes ! The University of Michigan is an exception due to limited state funding. Read the wikipedia entry on the University of Michigan. The last paragraph under "20th Century" addresses this matter in a concise manner. |
Not piling on here, but that was mu exact experience too. My kid is getting a much better educational experience at the SLAC they're attending, and that is the reason I sent them to college -- not for "ROI." |
You misunderstand--at least the posts that I have read in this thread. Please name the state flagship university. More helpful to divide higher education into at least four categories: Liberal Arts Colleges Private National Universities Large State Public University Honors Colleges Large State Public Universities |
https://umdrightnow.umd.edu/university-of-marylands-fearless-ideas-the-campaign-for-maryland-raises-record-1-5b :roll: |
Eyeroll all you want. The fact is that the overwhelming majority of private colleges & universities need to raise funds in order to survive; public universities do not. However, public universities have adopted private school fundraising techniques--which is fine although unnecessary unless the state has reduced funding to its public colleges and universities. |
+1000 Find the best fit for you and go to that school. It's quite simple. However, I would argue that the "large school experience" is much harder to get the same learning experiences as at a smaller school. To do so you must be a go getter, highly motivated and willing to persevere to get research opps in undergrad, to talk to professors (when teaching a class of 500+ kids, they don't really get to know you even if you come to office hours---they don't care and there are simply too many students for them to care about an undergrad who isn't in their research lab). From an academic perspective, you cannot convince me that a student will learn just as much in a 400+ person class as one with 20-25 students---learning should include discussions/interactions with others and that simply cannot happen at same level in the larger class. Yes kids learn at large schools, but they could be learning more/learning easier if they had smaller class sizes. I know because I attended a T10 with mostly smaller classes. Even for one major, where there were 120 freshman and we took one "history" class all together, we could still have discussions in that 120 class because we were a cohort and took 2 years of the class all together. But my chemistry with 300+ (1 lecture for Chem 101), there were not the same discussions because that cannot happen in a large lecture hall. But that was literally the only course that had more than 100 students (chemistry the first year was that large), physics series had at most 75 and that did allow discussions, and most everything else was under 40. It was amazing because you did not have to wait for office hours to ask questions---it happens during class and everyone learns from most of the questions. |
At some point, the price for "educational experience" becomes excessive. We are well beyond that point for most people. My parents, who were not poor but who were by no means wealthy, could pay for four years at a SLAC in the 1980s and not even notice it, but those days are over. That is why ROI is a valid concern and should not be dismissed as materialism or "not valuing learning for its own sake". |
+1 I have one at a huge public university and one at a SLAC. By the end of sophomore year my kid at the big school had no professor he felt he could ask for a recommendation when he needed one for an internship application. That was absolutely on him and I'd been nudging him to take the initiative to get to know his professors. He does technically have an 'advisor' but that's someone he talks to for about 15 min twice a year for setting up class schedule. After that sophomore year realization he was able to find an undergrad research program to participate in and was in a better place for recommendations in junior year. In contrast, DD at the SLAC has two advisors she meets with regularly and already by the end of freshman year had a close relationship with another professor in one of her major classes who was forwarding internship opportunities to her. If she needs a recommendation the only dilemma is which of multiple people to ask. At the same time, DS loves his big school and would hate a small one. DD would hate a big school. They are both getting what they need/want but DS has to take more initiative to get that. |
|
Regarding the University of Michigan, which has now amassed a top 10 endowment, this article may be of interest:
https://content.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1893286,00.html https://content.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1893286,00.html Time Cash-Strapped State Schools being Forced to Privatize Thursday, Apr.23,2009 |
Would help if you named the "huge public university". |
| Agree that if a student needs hand-holding that a small more intimate atmosphere might be better. |
Why do people keep saying to name the schools? People are sharing their experiences and if they name the schools, there will be other people saying they went to that exact same school and had the opposite experience. People are simply sharing their anecdotal experiences. People can and do have different experiences at the same schools. |
There is a big difference between hand holding and preferring a small school experience. Not everyone likes a 300 person lecture hall for their lower level classes. |