| Being able to give birth and recover in a non hospital setting doesn’t work for everyone. Should I suffer because I have had high risk pregnancies and needed C sections? |
| I was fine with rooming in, had done it successfully at another (non DC area) hospital, but OMG after my C section I needed rest and at Georgetown there was a constant parade of nurses, techs, med students and the occasional doctor. I left as early as I could. They could have coordinated even a little bit to cut down on the number of nighttime interruptions. It was crazy to me that being at home with a newborn and toddler was more restful! |
Yeah +1 I could have died or killed my baby if I'd done a home birth. Many things about hospital births suck but not worth that |
It’s strange you should be able to recover and rest after a major surgery and while you’re on pain meds you can’t take and drive a car? It’s strange to you that some people don’t think your spouse should have to fill in for hospital staff? Have higher expectations. Men would never put up with this BS. I figure women like you go along with it which is why baby friendly is even a thing. |
Exactly. It’s a rough rocky start. Most babies do sleep remarkably well that first night. Pack earplugs and an eye mask. It will help with the room dynamics. We got two hour chunks of sleep, which was about the same as at home the first week. I understand the frustration. It’s the most tired I’ve ever been (multiple day labor), you live through it. |
You can sleep or we can make sure that you aren't bleeding out, showing signs of an infection, or having dangerous changes to your blood pressure. If you think you don't need that, then you should just go home. Making sure patients stay alive is more important than making sure patients have uninterrupted sleep. |
| At Holy Cross in April 2020, hours after giving birth, I was permitted to send her to the nursery for a 3 hour stretch. That’s it. |
| Sounds like those complaining should do home births. No interruptions for pesky hospital things there! |
Exactly. Don’t like the rules, don’t give birth in a hospital |
Really? Higher staffing and more sensitive care wouldn't provide better maternal care? It's your way or bust? |
What’s strange is you can’t understand that other women have different needs and may not have a partner to care for the patient (baby). |
| A nurse dedicated to just a few patients would be able to provide medical care with as much deference to the patients' need for sleep and recovery |
I did. It was the only time there would be qualified medical professionals to care for my baby while I could sleep. As soon as I went home I was on my own. |
Or, you can keep me alive and still treat like a human being. I had my first baby in 1999, before the hospital MBAs had this brilliant baby friendly idea. My baby spent most of the time in the nursery, I got some rest after a difficult labor, and we happily went home in 48 hours. By the time I had baby #3, the lactation consultants, rooming in, etc. were in a full blown attack mode. Unfortunately, the only thing that will change it now will be if a baby does get harmed somewhere and the hospital will have to pay a gazillion bucks. Then the liability insurers will put a lid on it pronto. |
| I didn’t want them taking my babies away but I wanted them staying out of my room when we were sleeping. It’s completely insane that they were walking a sleeping mom and her baby constantly, refusing to let them get rest, ostensibly to check that they’re healthy. I can see why so many women risk home births in this country. |