Anyone else educated by FCPS and sees the decline?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think the older generations are always doom and gloom about school. My dad is livid that kids aren't learning cursive anymore. I couldn't be happier that it's gone.

I understand the suspicion of quality of snippets, materials cobbled together from online sources, etc., but the reality is that with electronic media there is often no reason to have a textbook. As a college professor, I have moved in the last 15 years from relying primarily on a very popular textbook to teaching my class without a textbook. I've read all 8 or so well-known textbooks in the field and I feel that, through powerpoints and assigned brief readings, I am able to outperform any textbook on the topic (students seem to agree). There is no benefit to reading a 50 page chapter in a bloated book that gets key principles incorrect or has not been updated to reflect changing theories or evidence.

I'd also point out that, in response to someone's comment about reading an abridged version of the Odyssey, this happened at both a public AND private school that I attended in the 90s, so this is not new unless you classify the mid-90s as "new."

Finally, while I have been skeptical of the changes to learning, I don't observe that my oldest son is behind where I and my peers were (in an advanced program) in terms of reading, writing, and math. It seems that students can learn to spell and write without memorizing vocabulary/spelling lists for hours every month. I say this is a wonderful development.



I am not sure what field you are in, but as a Humanities professor, I can say that a shocking number of students these days are extremely weak writers. The lack of explicitly grammar and writing instruction has had a profound effect. Yes, some kids can learn to spell simply by reading but many cannot. And I would argue that most kids cannot earn to write well without being taught. Writing instruction should be organized and systematic and start at the elementary level. I personally don't care about cursive or even much about neatness but teaching grammar, vocabulary, how to construct a sentence, then a paragraph-these are very basic building blocks. Putting a blank paper in front of a third grader, handing him a rubric, and saying it's poetry week is not teaching writing!

I can believe that you may be able to outperform all of the available textbooks, but can all the teachers?? Of course, not. Also, there used to be a value to having a text to go back to and reread, even if it was just s to have all the formulas in one place, all the dates easily accessible, all the verb forms and tenses well-organized. I don't know how kids study these days.

I wasn't educated in FCPS-I went to a private school in Massachusetts. But the education I received was immeasurably superior. The demands were greater, the expectations higher. To give a silly example, my highschooler in honors history has taken only multiple choice tests this year. What a waste of an opportunity to teach a kid to think and write critically, in addition to learn the material. Of course it's a lot easier to correct multiple choice and if you have 30 plus kids in every class, you do what you can to survive.




The biggest failing in FCPS (I can't compare to elsewhere). The writing (and reading, frankly) instructions is really bad. I've worked to fill in some of the gaps but it is still a failing. One big reason is that the teachers do not give writing feedback. They give a grade, they hand over a rubric, and expect kids to know what they did wrong. There's no written feedback, no redlining. As someone who did, and does, a lot of writing in school and in my profession, that sort of feedback is critical. It is the single best way to learn to write well. And it's not being done. (Read through other posts and teachers acknowledge this).

I'm sorry, it's shamefully unacceptable. This is a fundamental skill that kids are not being properly taught.


I am not sure the teachers know how to write, so expecting them to do much more than follow a check-the-box rubric may be asking too much.


I don't think this is right, or fair. But I do have a big problem with the justifications teachers offer as to why they don't do this. Simply stated, they are failing at their job by not doing it. I see the poor writing, as well, with job applications (writing samples required) of younger/entry level applicants. It's pretty appalling. And with my HS DC in honors English, the feedback that is not provided is BEYOND appalling.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The quality of the education I received 25 years ago was far superior to what is being offered now. Anyone else notice this?


Oh, most definitely. Not even comparable to what we received 25 years ago. It makes me so sad for what our kids are missing.
Anonymous
We're considering putting our kids in private despite paying 20k/year in taxes to Mclean high.
Anonymous
I don't know, is the writing terrible? Yes. But all other areas of instruction is far superior from when I was in school. From science to social studies to world history to even the electives they get to take. FCPS allowed my DD to take Alg 1 H in 6th. I was capable but it was never offered when I went to school. She is a freshman in PreCacl H now. Her biology class, despite not dissecting a frog, is light years ahead of what we did in terms of application of knowledge opportunities. They write a ton in WH 1 H. Lots of DBQs, the tests are not only multiple choice and every test has at least 2 writing sections. I think they're trying to mirror AP World a bit since most kids will take it next year. My daughter's programming elective seems to be really engaging and has allowed her to write some amazing code for the robotics club. She was already proficient in JAVA but it's helped her navigate what to do when she gets stuck. The teacher is incredible.
Anonymous
The biggest issue now is that teachers are required to use some ridiculous model of teaching where they are supposed to only give instruction for 10 minutes, then students are supposed to practice and collaborate for an hour before teachers are allowed to give a five minute wrap up. During the hour of independent work, teachers rotate through groups to work with small groups.

If teachers give instruction for more than 10 minutes, they get marked down on their evaluations. There are no more lectures permitted, even in secondary school. I cannot wrap my head around the stupidity of this approach.

Teachers are also expected to make everything fun, students aren't expected to take notes, there are retakes on everything, and there is no discipline /consequences for poor behavior.


I forsee nothing but disaster with the current instructional approach. Our kids aren't learning nearly as much as we did because teachers aren't allowed to actually teach.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:We're considering putting our kids in private despite paying 20k/year in taxes to Mclean high.


You don't pay $20K in taxes to McLean HS. You may pay $20K in property taxes to Fairfax County, only a very small portion of which will ever make its way back to McLean HS.

Which, by the way, is a very good school despite getting short-changed by FCPS at every turn (most National Merit Semifinalists of any public HS in VA last fall besides TJ, including Langley). But you do you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It's not FCPS. Teaching has changed, the changes are nationwide.


Let's be clear the teachers don't have time to teach....but guess what we did 25 years ago. Also Parents were parenting and we weren't dealing with the ridiculous behaviors and disrespect we see now.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:For two kids I have a monthly budget of $2000.00 for tutoring and enrichment. We are in McLean and majority parents are doing the same, if McLean schools look solid on paper it’s only because of parental involvement and enrichment/tutoring spending. No credit goes to FCPS.


Then homeschool-what does it matter if your tutors are doing it all.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We left FCPS for a more rural part of Virginia, and the quality of our kids' education went up in spades.

In fact, our younger one had to reach really deep initially to catch up on writing, because FCPS hadn't been making the students in her grade do any real writing. This kid went from filling in blanks on worksheets in FCPS to having to compose three-page essays overnight on the same subject matter.

Also, math class moves A LOT faster and is structured differently. This year, our HS freshman is taking geometry but it just became trig and is quickly steaming ahead toward basic calculus concepts by the end of the year.

Our kid's new math, English, and history teachers didn't seem particularly shocked by these learning deficits; it's like it all made sense to them as soon as we mentioned where we had moved from. Just our experience.


Name it. Because this is directly contrary to my understanding about the more rural school districts in VA.


As a product of rural VA schools, I can tell you that the quality is much better, if by “quality” you mean “adherence to myths like the Lost Cause.” If you wanted to take a math class harder than Adv Alg/Trig, you had to dual enroll at a community college. There were 5 total AP classes for the district and not every HS offered them all, so kids had to be bused to one of the other 2.

Real quality stuff.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I am beginning to welcome our new equity overloads. As standards continue to lower, my kids, with our support, will continue to distance themselves.

Parents who didn’t care enough to support their kids during inequitable times will continue to not care and those in the middle will just get dumber.

I can fill in the gaps for my kids and know they will be ok academically. But I do not welcome a dumber society bc it impacts all of us. Dumb people vote. [/quote


Ahhh… now you are catching on. A dumb ill informed electorate that believes government is the solution votes for the people who are dumbing them down. It is a positive feedback loop and it has worked well in Virginia. All of this awareness about how crappy FCPS has become and how the real challenges aren’t being addressed won’t stop most of you from voting in a school board like we have now AGAIN.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:One data point:

My child in Honors 9th grade English at Langley is reading an abridged version of the Odyssey. It’s about 1/3 the length of the original book and the language is simplified.

I read the full book when I was in 9th grade in FCPS and her older cousin also read the full book about 10 years ago in another FCPS high school.


Then have your child read the full book at home. Fairfax County has libraries.


I hate this response. Yes, parents should do educational things at home. But the notion that we should be making up for big gaps in what the school is doing is ridiculous.


+1
Anonymous
So much to say here but I will keep it short.

I graduated in the 80s from what is now considered one of the very low performing high schools in FCPS. That was not the case then. It wasn't at the top, but the divide between the top and bottom was so much less at that time. Fill certain schools with low-income, non-English speaking students and what do you think is going to happen? Certain schools have been hammered in this way. So across the county you would see very different responses to the OP's question based on the situation for that particular school.

As for the teaching and education, IB served my kids fine, but the 80s standard English classes and AP classes handled writing just as well. IB math was terrible for my kids relative to the math in the 80s. Almost forgot, grammar lessons were almost non-existent for my kids in middle school. Not the case for me in middle school. I still remember the 7th grade sentence diagraming exercises.

And I had textbooks - they are extremely helpful for some classes, especially if a teacher is not strong. I think more textbooks and fewer screens would be a win for everyone.

Related but tangent question - does anyone know the average age and years of experience for teachers in FCPS today versus the 80s? My guess is that is not a number anyone knows, but it seems to me the averages have probably gone down.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:For two kids I have a monthly budget of $2000.00 for tutoring and enrichment. We are in McLean and majority parents are doing the same, if McLean schools look solid on paper it’s only because of parental involvement and enrichment/tutoring spending. No credit goes to FCPS.


Ah just like MCPS! But Central Office at MCPS has a TV Channel that brags on your kid’s successes. I know FCPS has one too and even funded a crew to go to Central America to ‘connect’ with the culture there a few years ago.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I think the older generations are always doom and gloom about school. My dad is livid that kids aren't learning cursive anymore. I couldn't be happier that it's gone.

I understand the suspicion of quality of snippets, materials cobbled together from online sources, etc., but the reality is that with electronic media there is often no reason to have a textbook. As a college professor, I have moved in the last 15 years from relying primarily on a very popular textbook to teaching my class without a textbook. I've read all 8 or so well-known textbooks in the field and I feel that, through powerpoints and assigned brief readings, I am able to outperform any textbook on the topic (students seem to agree). There is no benefit to reading a 50 page chapter in a bloated book that gets key principles incorrect or has not been updated to reflect changing theories or evidence.

I'd also point out that, in response to someone's comment about reading an abridged version of the Odyssey, this happened at both a public AND private school that I attended in the 90s, so this is not new unless you classify the mid-90s as "new."

Finally, while I have been skeptical of the changes to learning, I don't observe that my oldest son is behind where I and my peers were (in an advanced program) in terms of reading, writing, and math. It seems that students can learn to spell and write without memorizing vocabulary/spelling lists for hours every month. I say this is a wonderful development.



+1
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I don't know, is the writing terrible? Yes. But all other areas of instruction is far superior from when I was in school. From science to social studies to world history to even the electives they get to take. FCPS allowed my DD to take Alg 1 H in 6th. I was capable but it was never offered when I went to school. She is a freshman in PreCacl H now. Her biology class, despite not dissecting a frog, is light years ahead of what we did in terms of application of knowledge opportunities. They write a ton in WH 1 H. Lots of DBQs, the tests are not only multiple choice and every test has at least 2 writing sections. I think they're trying to mirror AP World a bit since most kids will take it next year. My daughter's programming elective seems to be really engaging and has allowed her to write some amazing code for the robotics club. She was already proficient in JAVA but it's helped her navigate what to do when she gets stuck. The teacher is incredible.


Where did she learn Java? Glad to hear the positive school experience and hoping it is our pyramid or that our school will offer a similar experience.
post reply Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: