Paris Hilton wedding dress and hair - thoughts?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I want to know their secrets.



Barron Hilton, Tessa Hilton, Kathy Hilton, Paris Hilton, Carter Reum & Nicky Hilton Rothschild

The secret is money! Kathy Hilton looks so good. Wow

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I want to know their secrets.



Barron Hilton, Tessa Hilton, Kathy Hilton, Paris Hilton, Carter Reum & Nicky Hilton Rothschild

The secret is money! Kathy Hilton looks so good. Wow

Disagree. Kathy’s face looks entirely plastic. Niki and Paris (but too much tan) look great. So does the other woman I don’t know who she is, a brother’s spouse? The men look good too. Paris’s husband looks a bit femme for my taste though

[Anonymous]

^^ the nonstop shine in the face is from Botox. Looks horrible

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^^ the nonstop shine in the face is from Botox. Looks horrible

Also, hair pieces.

[Anonymous]

the actual wedding dress is nice - the reception dress is basis.
Her hair looked terrible.

And no matter what she wears - the backbend pose in every shot ruins everything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This post is useless without actual embedded photos. Some of you are so lazy!

Yes. Your inability to google is truly lazy.

Why should someone have to leave this thread and site to hunt for the topic of the thread to discuss it? If you are posting about dresses, post the damn dresses in the thread.

How ‘bout this: you open the link. Don’t see pics. Move on.

OK so you are stupid, that explains it. Because creating a thread to discuss dresses no one can see without taking extra steps to find said dresses makes no sense. What does make sense is at least including a link to the dresses even if you can't embed pics but to have nothing at all is a waste of time and in the future I shall report said threads for wasting our f***ing time.

+2
I'm the PP who has been adding photos to this thread. I don't know why particular people are digging in about no photos being OK in a post that literally says "Paris Hilton wedding dress and hair - thoughts?" Do you need help?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This post is useless without actual embedded photos. Some of you are so lazy!

Yes. Your inability to google is truly lazy.

Why should someone have to leave this thread and site to hunt for the topic of the thread to discuss it? If you are posting about dresses, post the damn dresses in the thread.

How ‘bout this: you open the link. Don’t see pics. Move on.

OK so you are stupid, that explains it. Because creating a thread to discuss dresses no one can see without taking extra steps to find said dresses makes no sense. What does make sense is at least including a link to the dresses even if you can't embed pics but to have nothing at all is a waste of time and in the future I shall report said threads for wasting our f***ing time.

+2
I'm the PP who has been adding photos to this thread. I don't know why particular people are digging in about no photos being OK in a post that literally says "Paris Hilton wedding dress and hair - thoughts?" Do you need help?

what is this forum about? How to be b$tchy? I thought it was about PH dresses and hair.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This post is useless without actual embedded photos. Some of you are so lazy!

Yes. Your inability to google is truly lazy.

Why should someone have to leave this thread and site to hunt for the topic of the thread to discuss it? If you are posting about dresses, post the damn dresses in the thread.

How ‘bout this: you open the link. Don’t see pics. Move on.

OK so you are stupid, that explains it. Because creating a thread to discuss dresses no one can see without taking extra steps to find said dresses makes no sense. What does make sense is at least including a link to the dresses even if you can't embed pics but to have nothing at all is a waste of time and in the future I shall report said threads for wasting our f***ing time.

You’ll report it? That’s not even reportable! (I mean you can report it, but how it is prohibited?)

[Anonymous]

ImStupid wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ImStupid wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This post is useless without actual embedded photos. Some of you are so lazy!

Yes. Your inability to google is truly lazy.

Why should someone have to leave this thread and site to hunt for the topic of the thread to discuss it? If you are posting about dresses, post the damn dresses in the thread.

How ‘bout this: you open the link. Don’t see pics. Move on.

OK so you are stupid, that explains it. Because creating a thread to discuss dresses no one can see without taking extra steps to find said dresses makes no sense. What does make sense is at least including a link to the dresses even if you can't embed pics but to have nothing at all is a waste of time and in the future I shall report said threads for wasting our f***ing time.

+2
I'm the PP who has been adding photos to this thread. I don't know why particular people are digging in about no photos being OK in a post that literally says "Paris Hilton wedding dress and hair - thoughts?" Do you need help?

what is this forum about? How to be b$tchy? I thought it was about PH dresses and hair.

Not if you don't post pictures of them first, dipsh1t!!!

It's easy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

ImStupid wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

ImStupid wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This post is useless without actual embedded photos. Some of you are so lazy!

Yes. Your inability to google is truly lazy.

Why should someone have to leave this thread and site to hunt for the topic of the thread to discuss it? If you are posting about dresses, post the damn dresses in the thread.

How ‘bout this: you open the link. Don’t see pics. Move on.

OK so you are stupid, that explains it. Because creating a thread to discuss dresses no one can see without taking extra steps to find said dresses makes no sense. What does make sense is at least including a link to the dresses even if you can't embed pics but to have nothing at all is a waste of time and in the future I shall report said threads for wasting our f***ing time.

+2
I'm the PP who has been adding photos to this thread. I don't know why particular people are digging in about no photos being OK in a post that literally says "Paris Hilton wedding dress and hair - thoughts?" Do you need help?

what is this forum about? How to be b$tchy? I thought it was about PH dresses and hair.

Not if you don't post pictures of them first, dipsh1t!!!

It's easy.

Wow.

[Anonymous]

I have to admit it--she looks stunning in all the photos. I love the more cinderella type dress she chose for the reception. the pink is gaudy for sure but that's the look she was going for with the carnival. I also love her wedding gown and it's Grace Kelly-esque bodice. This could have been way way worse.

[Anonymous]

Did anyone find a pic of Nicky in the non-pink dress? She was wearing a lacy white thing at a table pic I saw but I can't see the whole outfit.

[Anonymous]

Found some stuff on e:

[Anonymous]

I like Nicky's dress:

[Anonymous]

The white white dress looks better here: