Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe Obama is being asked to speak at a funeral?

Oh wow

Yes and he had to show up in person for they very important request.

[Anonymous]

https://x.com/angryblacklady/status/1769707232634065400

Interesting

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-13209049/Prince-William-feeling-hurt-seeing-elements-hounding-mother-Princess-Diana-experienced-social-media-explodes-outlandish-conspiracy-theories-Kate-Middletons-health-royal-expert-claims.html

I could see that.

More like “William’s outrage has lit a fire under KPs PR people’s bums to do their jobs and get some sympathetic coverage for the Prince, instead of leaking faked photos and “spottings” of Kate to the media & thereby calling more attention to her disappearance.”

Exactly. “Poor William” stories just don’t cut it for me. He is the source of the problem and he leads Kensington Palace on stupid things like buying fake bots, fake social media followers, and now fake pictures and then blames his wife .

[Anonymous]

*shocked* that after generations of personality disorders, abuse, and alcoholism the BRF is struggling to have a pristine image.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s The Russian Princess Tea Party and their comrades posting here incessantly. Now it’s staring to make more sense.

DP. And explains why they have the robotic responses on rotation: obfuscate, gaslight, abuse, saccharine, ignorance, repeat as needed.

We know you are the same person.

DP#2. I'm not sure about the Russian bot theory. But lots of us agree the Disney Princess Tea Party, or whatever we're calling those posters, have robotic responses on rotation: obfuscate, gaslight, abuse, foul mouth, saccharine, ignorance, repeat as needed.

Ask the moderator.

The moderator is doing very well with ads based on engagement and thread length here. Your description of the responses is absolutely an inversion of reality. He doesn’t care that you and your ilk are a combo of dumb and nuts. It’s all the $ame to him.

^^^ Exhibit A for obfuscate, gaslight, abuse, foul mouth, saccharine and ignorance.

DP. Yes, an obfuscate, ignorance and lies combo. This thread is more of a headache than a revenue-generator for Jeff. But he does care that the thread not be pushed off the rails by robotic responses on rotation: obfuscate, gaslight, abuse, foul mouth, saccharine, ignorance, repeat as needed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wait just catching up. Looking on Twitter. Why is Obama at Downing Street?

Diplomacy. It is not unusual for past presidents to meet with other leaders when they are allies. It has nothing to do with Kate!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have never cared about royals and would not have noticed if she took a year off, but the deception with the photo has me hooked on this story.

Same. I'd say my pre-photo interest in the royals was mild and entirely for fun. I have long enjoyed looking at the fashion. But I barely followed the whole Harry and Meghan thing. To me it was on par with most celebrity gossip -- a way to pass the time in a waiting room or on a plane, can be fun to chat with friends about, but not something I take seriously or think about almost at all the rest of the time.

The photo incident really grabbed my attention because I can't remember the last time a high profile public person did something that strange, press wise. I don't buy most of the theories about it (she's not dead, why would they hide this, and the divorce/affair rumors are all pretty ridiculous-sounding) but I am very curious to find out how that screw up happened and think there might be some kind of underlying scandal. Thus watching and waiting to see what it is, if anything.

Really?

I don't follow much related to the royals at all, but even I've heard of Rose Hanbury and her supposed affair with William for years. I mean, his dad had an affair. His grandpa had affairs. 3/4 of his aunts and uncles are divorced. It's not like it's SHOCKING that he might have had an affair...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wait just catching up. Looking on Twitter. Why is Obama at Downing Street?

Clearly bc he’s ascending the throne. Keep up!

Some leading theories:

1. He’s mediating between Prince William and Prince Harry (who must be zooming in from California, I guess.)
2. He’s speaking at Charles funeral
3. He’s on the ground to personally hunt for Kate Middleton
4. He wants another photo op with Prince George in pajamas
5. He has an important appointment with paddington bear
6. Some boring official business on behalf of his charity, Gaza, Ukraine, global warming, blah blah.
7. Can’t get a proper cup of tea - or any of the royal tea (wink wink) - stateside
8. He’s Kate’s side piece. He has come to rescue her.
9. Michelle is Kate’s side piece for whom she has left William. Barack is outraged and demands Kate see him and reconsider.
10. He’s a big Harry Potter fan and wants to visit kings cross (though this will have to be discreet given what a bigot JK Rowling has turned out to be.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who don't believe Russia is engaged in a disinformation/fake news war, Russian media is reporting that Charles has died, complete with fake announcement from Buckingham Palace.

I've actually wondered if The Princess Party that posts incessantly here is not Russian powered.

What would be the point? I’m very informed about the troll farms and disinformation but I don’t see the point here.

There really are people who think that royalty aren’t humans with human flaws and take offense to any insinuation that they are. It’s bizarre when their dysfunction is so clearly on display generation after generation.

What's the point of the trolls in the relationship forum?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://x.com/angryblacklady/status/1769707232634065400

Interesting

It is actually possible.

Harry is 5th in line after William, George, Charlotte, and Louis to be king.

If William can’t succeed Charles for whatever scandalous reason, it is possible Charles may appoint Harry king but the country will have meltdowns if Meghan becomes Queen Meghan

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://x.com/angryblacklady/status/1769707232634065400

Interesting

It is actually possible.

Harry is 5th in line after William, George, Charlotte, and Louis to be king.

If William can’t succeed Charles for whatever scandalous reason, it is possible Charles may appoint Harry king but the country will have meltdowns if Meghan becomes Queen Meghan

Now that would make a good Harvey Weinstein movie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://x.com/angryblacklady/status/1769707232634065400

Interesting

It is actually possible.

Harry is 5th in line after William, George, Charlotte, and Louis to be king.

If William can’t succeed Charles for whatever scandalous reason, it is possible Charles may appoint Harry king but the country will have meltdowns if Meghan becomes Queen Meghan

How can she be queen? She’s American.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait just catching up. Looking on Twitter. Why is Obama at Downing Street?

Clearly bc he’s ascending the throne. Keep up!

Some leading theories:

1. He’s mediating between Prince William and Prince Harry (who must be zooming in from California, I guess.)
2. He’s speaking at Charles funeral
3. He’s on the ground to personally hunt for Kate Middleton
4. He wants another photo op with Prince George in pajamas
5. He has an important appointment with paddington bear
6. Some boring official business on behalf of his charity, Gaza, Ukraine, global warming, blah blah.
7. Can’t get a proper cup of tea - or any of the royal tea (wink wink) - stateside
8. He’s Kate’s side piece. He has come to rescue her.
9. Michelle is Kate’s side piece for whom she has left William. Barack is outraged and demands Kate see him and reconsider.
10. He’s a big Harry Potter fan and wants to visit kings cross (though this will have to be discreet given what a bigot JK Rowling has turned out to be.)

I loved the Obamas relationship with the Queen, Will and Kate, and Harry and Meg. Obama fits in well with British humor too.

Trump tried and failed miserably to make an impression. Who can forget this hilarious gif?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://x.com/angryblacklady/status/1769707232634065400

Interesting

It is actually possible.

Harry is 5th in line after William, George, Charlotte, and Louis to be king.

If William can’t succeed Charles for whatever scandalous reason, it is possible Charles may appoint Harry king but the country will have meltdowns if Meghan becomes Queen Meghan

It would go to George

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://x.com/angryblacklady/status/1769707232634065400

Interesting

It is actually possible.

Harry is 5th in line after William, George, Charlotte, and Louis to be king.

If William can’t succeed Charles for whatever scandalous reason, it is possible Charles may appoint Harry king but the country will have meltdowns if Meghan becomes Queen Meghan

How can she be queen? She’s American.

How can Camilla be Queen? She’s divorced.