Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I will say, the handwriting is on point though vs confirmed Epstein handwriting. Exact same style for various letters. Someone posted this earlier and I was skeptical till I looked.

I've always wondered how handwriting is evaluated by experts. My handwriting has changed over the years, and depending on whether my right fingers are warmed up or not, can vary significantly within a short span of time.

So for example, when Trump said he had not signed the birthday note to Epstein with the outline of a female body, I thought the signature did indeed look like all his other signatures over the years. My handwriting varies more than that. So what about Epstein's handwriting?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DOJ is releasing fake info along with real info to confuse people. This is despicable.

There is no reason (yet) to believe that the note is not real.

Apparently, the FBI is now saying letter is fake. This begs the question why didn't the FBI investigate the validity of this letter before releasing. Deliberately obfuscation.

The basis of the claim that the letter was fake has now been debunked.

Cite your source and provide a link, please. Everything I see says it's fake.

CNN and other outlets are verifying that it is real.

The postmark was explained and there is record of it at the NY jail.

[Anonymous]

Palm Beach police threatened charges against a victim who cam forward. Gee, wonder how this went on for so long.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mark Epstein, by documents files with the FBI, believes Trump murdered his brother.

Yup.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DOJ is releasing fake info along with real info to confuse people. This is despicable.

There is no reason (yet) to believe that the note is not real.

Apparently, the FBI is now saying letter is fake. This begs the question why didn't the FBI investigate the validity of this letter before releasing. Deliberately obfuscation.

The basis of the claim that the letter was fake has now been debunked.

Cite your source and provide a link, please. Everything I see says it's fake.

CNN and other outlets are verifying that it is real.

The postmark was explained and there is record of it at the NY jail.

cnn is reporting that it is fake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DOJ is releasing fake info along with real info to confuse people. This is despicable.

There is no reason (yet) to believe that the note is not real.

Apparently, the FBI is now saying letter is fake. This begs the question why didn't the FBI investigate the validity of this letter before releasing. Deliberately obfuscation.

The basis of the claim that the letter was fake has now been debunked.

Cite your source and provide a link, please. Everything I see says it's fake.

CNN and other outlets are verifying that it is real.

The postmark was explained and there is record of it at the NY jail.

cnn is reporting that it is fake.

No, they are saying that DOJ is claiming it is fake. the analysis and fact show that it is real.

There is a difference between DOJ/Administration claims and facts.

[Anonymous]

This isn't how the DOJ normally talks. Now, this is how Trump's corrupt DOJ talks...but this isn't normal. This is weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This isn't how the DOJ normally talks. Now, this is how Trump's corrupt DOJ talks...but this isn't normal. This is weird.

"The Department of Justice has officially released nearly 30,000 more pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein.

Some of these documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election. To be clear: the claims are unfounded and false, and if they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already.

Nevertheless, out of our commitment to the law and transparency, the DOJ is releasing these documents with the legally required protections for Epstein’s victims."

[Anonymous]

DOJ was considering charging a victim with conspiracy regarding recruiting other victims. What I noticed is that she was represented by Susan Necheles, who represented Trump in the Stormy Daniels case. Small world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

2 weeks ago, Trump issued an EO banning "strong laws against AI"

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/12/eliminating-state-law-obstruction-of-national-artificial-intelligence-policy/


Remember: Every Republican is a willing supporter of a child-rape cabal.

Good point. That statement is quite a contradiction of his own actions.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Trump is now an alleged baby killer. Pro lifers, how do we feel about this one? Is it ok to commit “post birth abortion” if Trump might be the daddy?

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00025010.pdf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump is now an alleged baby killer. Pro lifers, how do we feel about this one? Is it ok to commit “post birth abortion” if Trump might be the daddy?

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00025010.pdf

They literally use the White House zip code for his address: 20500. He was president when the FBI took this intake. This is reprehensible and so many people should go to jail.

[Anonymous]

And yes ^^ as someone on IG said, he's always telling on himself. So, it said it was Dems, but that's because he didn't consider it out of the realm of possibility. I don't understand how this isn't the headline on every single news channel.

[Anonymous]

It is safe to assume that everything DOJ/FBI days is a lie.