Rosie O’Donnell and her illegal campaign contributions

[Anonymous]

Rosie O'Donnell used 5 different addresses and 4 variations of her name when exceeding the campaign contributions according to FEC laws.

She willfully and knowingly exceeded the limits. These deceptive tactics should be dealt with swiftly and to the letter of the law. Will they?

Of course, she claims the onus is on the campaigns to keep track of donations.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5695913/Rosie-ODonnell-illegally-exceeded-campaign-contribution-limits.html
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/05/06/rosie-odonnells-donations-to-dems-exceeded-limit-report.html

[Anonymous]

Who cares. If she violated the law and it can be proven, she should be found guilty. But really, who cares.

[Anonymous]

Interesting. Probably not a single liberal media outlet reported this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Probably not a single liberal media outlet reported this.

Interest8mg that not a single conservative cares about all Trump's campaign violations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Probably not a single liberal media outlet reported this.

You realize she is a conservative, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who cares. If she violated the law and it can be proven, she should be found guilty. But really, who cares.

How quaint. Laws don’t matter anymore. It’s all politics. Trump can break all the laws he wants and nobody cares. The Democratic FBI is just out to get him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares. If she violated the law and it can be proven, she should be found guilty. But really, who cares.

How quaint. Laws don’t matter anymore. It’s all politics. Trump can break all the laws he wants and nobody cares. The Democratic FBI is just out to get him.

No. As I said, if she broke the law and they can prove it, she should be convicted and sentenced. We have much more pressing issues to discuss, such as Orange Turd. What a second rate actress does is not that interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Probably not a single liberal media outlet reported this.

You realize she is a conservative, right?

apparently so is Stormy Daniels yet look at all the media coverage an anti trump person is given whereas little to none for rosie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Probably not a single liberal media outlet reported this.

You realize she is a conservative, right?

I would LOVE your source for this. She is NOT conservative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Probably not a single liberal media outlet reported this.

You realize she is a conservative, right?

I would LOVE your source for this. She is NOT conservative.

You are right. She is a Trumpkin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Probably not a single liberal media outlet reported this.

You realize she is a conservative, right?

I would LOVE your source for this. She is NOT conservative.

You are right. She is a Trumpkin.

You are confusing Rosie O'Donnell with Rosanne Barr/Arnold

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Rosie O'Donnell used 5 different addresses and 4 variations of her name when exceeding the campaign contributions according to FEC laws.

She willfully and knowingly exceeded the limits. These deceptive tactics should be dealt with swiftly and to the letter of the law. Will they?

Of course, she claims the onus is on the campaigns to keep track of donations.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5695913/Rosie-ODonnell-illegally-exceeded-campaign-contribution-limits.html
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/05/06/rosie-odonnells-donations-to-dems-exceeded-limit-report.html

A fine is what should happen.

Next.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Probably not a single liberal media outlet reported this.

You realize she is a conservative, right?

I would LOVE your source for this. She is NOT conservative.

You are right. She is a Trumpkin.

Oh, dear Lord. Please don’t post anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares. If she violated the law and it can be proven, she should be found guilty. But really, who cares.

How quaint. Laws don’t matter anymore. It’s all politics. Trump can break all the laws he wants and nobody cares. The Democratic FBI is just out to get him.

No. As I said, if she broke the law and they can prove it, she should be convicted and sentenced. We have much more pressing issues to discuss, such as Orange Turd. What a second rate actress does is not that interesting.

+1. I have no qualms about throwing her in jail if she is proven to have done something wrong. She is so yesterday.

Now can we talk about Trump lying about his influence on North Korea or lying about the NK hostages?! Holy hell, people - let's gain some perspective.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rosie O'Donnell used 5 different addresses and 4 variations of her name when exceeding the campaign contributions according to FEC laws.

She willfully and knowingly exceeded the limits. These deceptive tactics should be dealt with swiftly and to the letter of the law. Will they?

Of course, she claims the onus is on the campaigns to keep track of donations.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5695913/Rosie-ODonnell-illegally-exceeded-campaign-contribution-limits.html
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/05/06/rosie-odonnells-donations-to-dems-exceeded-limit-report.html

A fine is what should happen.

Next.

Interesting. Dinesh D’Sousa got lots more than a fine.

Judge Richard M. Berman of Federal District Court in Manhattan sentenced Mr. D’Souza to five years of probation — including eight months living under supervision in a “community confinement center” in San Diego — and a $30,000 fine. The sentencing brought to a close a high-profile legal battle that began with Mr. D’Souza’s indictment in January on charges that he illegally used straw donors to contribute to a Republican Senate candidate in New York in 2012.

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/24/us/dsouza-is-spared-prison-time-for-campaign-finance-violations.html