Anyone else read the totally boring article on buying a house and schools in the Washington Post

[Anonymous]

that they tried to get info. on these boards. How completely predictable with ZERO insight! Wow, parents think about schools when buying a house! What an insight.

[Anonymous]

It is a great newspaper for lining birdcages nowadays, but not much else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is a great newspaper for lining birdcages nowadays, but not much else.

I know. They can't even spell Bethesda. Check out WP article with the misspelling "Beathesda"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/23/AR2009092303737.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is a great newspaper for lining birdcages nowadays, but not much else.

I agree. The quality has really gone down hill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is a great newspaper for lining birdcages nowadays, but not much else.

Totally unfair characterization. I also put it in front of the cat box for those near misses.

[Anonymous]

newsflash: you get what you paid for. are you even a paid customer?

[Anonymous]

We pay the subscription. I need the plastic bags for dog poop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:newsflash: you get what you paid for. are you even a paid customer?

It is such tripe I would have to be a paid customer.

They seem to find enough money to pay tired old hacks like Cohen to drool out their drivel, not to mention various assorted rent-a-quote right wingers. I am sure they could get more intelligent people to write better articles for less. Not to mention page after page of content-free crap about "We live in Chevy Chase View" or whatever.

[Anonymous]

I am not a fan of the NY Times (or NY) but was reading it recently and it reminded me of what a real newpaper should be like. I am considering their weekend subscription. Would that be disloyal to Washington?

[Anonymous]

15:15, I'm right there with you. The new Washington Post lite is sad.

[Anonymous]

I haven't found the NYT to be much better than the WaPo, honestly. For real news, I prefer the Wall Street Journal. Everything else is about as elevated as Time Magazine.

[Anonymous]

I just came across a dangling modifier in the NYTimes. Let's not put them on such a high pedestal.

[Anonymous]

The article was garbage, just like most of the Post these days. It read like a recycled Washingtonian article from 1994.