Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain where BBC went black? On twitter, the website, tv, what?

At least on Twitter but as others have said, the black is not new. But I do not have personal knowledge of the change or know this for a fact (so don’t @ me ppp’s).

What the BBC is NOT doing is picking up this Kate siting story.

+1
Which I love. Good for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain where BBC went black? On twitter, the website, tv, what?

At least on Twitter but as others have said, the black is not new. But I do not have personal knowledge of the change or know this for a fact (so don’t @ me ppp’s).

What the BBC is NOT doing is picking up this Kate siting story.

+1
Which I love. Good for them.

They’re not reporting it because it isn’t real. BBC has more journalistic standards than a rag like The Sun

[Anonymous]

I'm sorry but can anyone explain why not just believe she had a procedure and needs until after Easter to recovery? What is the evidence for that not being the case?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Kate is not dead nor divorced nor in ED rehab. While most will find this good news, some will be sorely disappointed no doubt.

They were in a public place for an extended period of time, and there are NO pictures, not even bad ones? Your BS meter is broken.

+1 they reportedly attended multiple of their kids sports and no one has a photo?

This poor poster will be up all night, scouring the internet for a glimpse of Kate. So, so funny.

So, no comment on the other pictures which you (or tanother PP) assured us were not there? I think they really are.

You mean random pictures surreptitiously taken by some unhinged royal stalker and strung together in amateur videos from a long time ago, narrated with a scary AI voice? Wait a sec... did YOU put those videos together?

You (or another PP) should be clear about what you want, if you ask for it. Pro Tip: Don' specify "any time" if you are not going to accept photos from "any time."

DP, completely DP. Your insistence that photos from “any time” is some sort of gotcha is just bizarre.

Can we move on to actual discussions now?

Sure, given that there were supposed to be no photos of the kids being dropped off at school, from (and yes, I quote) "any time" -- other than the ones that happen every year.

Let's talka bout why the BBC went black.

JFC. The BBC is not black. Post a link or shut up.
DP

It’s black for me on Twitter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain where BBC went black? On twitter, the website, tv, what?

At least on Twitter but as others have said, the black is not new. But I do not have personal knowledge of the change or know this for a fact (so don’t @ me ppp’s).

What the BBC is NOT doing is picking up this Kate siting story.

+1
Which I love. Good for them.

Good for them? lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry but can anyone explain why not just believe she had a procedure and needs until after Easter to recovery? What is the evidence for that not being the case?

This article provides a good primer

For Tldr skip down to the timeline
https://www.niemanlab.org/2024/03/this-is-just-weird-buzzfeed-news-former-royals-reporter-on-kate-middleton-palace-press-and-distrust-in-the-media/?fbclid=IwAR0IUvXPKx0unj3SCEjQntNCQGTi1dC8uVOKLVZximV9ZneLt076ffjBukg

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry but can anyone explain why not just believe she had a procedure and needs until after Easter to recovery? What is the evidence for that not being the case?

This article provides a good primer

For Tldr skip down to the timeline
https://www.niemanlab.org/2024/03/this-is-just-weird-buzzfeed-news-former-royals-reporter-on-kate-middleton-palace-press-and-distrust-in-the-media/?fbclid=IwAR0IUvXPKx0unj3SCEjQntNCQGTi1dC8uVOKLVZximV9ZneLt076ffjBukg

dp but thanks! I have been looking for this link

[Anonymous]

Do you guys think they're going to fire their entire team? I feel a bit bad for them. Also is there why the RF goes thought so many private secretaries so quicky?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do you guys think they're going to fire their entire team? I feel a bit bad for them. Also is there why the RF goes thought so many private secretaries so quicky?

same nonny. Meant *through.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain where BBC went black? On twitter, the website, tv, what?

At least on Twitter but as others have said, the black is not new. But I do not have personal knowledge of the change or know this for a fact (so don’t @ me ppp’s).

What the BBC is NOT doing is picking up this Kate siting story.

The news agencies that rely on fact checkers are not going to report this unless it can be corroborated. KP has been deemed deeply unreliable so they're not going to out their necks out for some puff piece with no pics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry but can anyone explain why not just believe she had a procedure and needs until after Easter to recovery? What is the evidence for that not being the case?

This article provides a good primer

For Tldr skip down to the timeline
https://www.niemanlab.org/2024/03/this-is-just-weird-buzzfeed-news-former-royals-reporter-on-kate-middleton-palace-press-and-distrust-in-the-media/?fbclid=IwAR0IUvXPKx0unj3SCEjQntNCQGTi1dC8uVOKLVZximV9ZneLt076ffjBukg

dp but thanks! I have been looking for this link

You’re welcome! The TLDR Kate thread has that link too

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain where BBC went black? On twitter, the website, tv, what?

At least on Twitter but as others have said, the black is not new. But I do not have personal knowledge of the change or know this for a fact (so don’t @ me ppp’s).

What the BBC is NOT doing is picking up this Kate siting story.

The news agencies that rely on fact checkers are not going to report this unless it can be corroborated. KP has been deemed deeply unreliable so they're not going to out their necks out for some puff piece with no pics.

Exactly. KP has no credibility anymore. It’s a surprise to me so many fonts are sticking to the Palace’s updates like it’s law even now after the debacle.

It’s no wonder so many Americans get email and telephone scammed . The gullibility on here has to really be seen to be believed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain where BBC went black? On twitter, the website, tv, what?

At least on Twitter but as others have said, the black is not new. But I do not have personal knowledge of the change or know this for a fact (so don’t @ me ppp’s).

What the BBC is NOT doing is picking up this Kate siting story.

The news agencies that rely on fact checkers are not going to report this unless it can be corroborated. KP has been deemed deeply unreliable so they're not going to out their necks out for some puff piece with no pics.

Would the BBC ordinarily report that Kate went to the store? Please.

The British tabloids are all reporting this. I guess we're all more credulous than you.

[Anonymous]

The Sunday scam this week was more pathetic than last week’s Mothers Day nightmare . A farmers market and sports with the kids outing with zero pictures

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do you guys think they're going to fire their entire team? I feel a bit bad for them. Also is there why the RF goes thought so many private secretaries so quicky?

I feel bad for Charles kinda . He was so jealous of Diana taking the spotlight from him, and couldn’t wait to be king and really push his initiatives (largely about environment, health, and organic foods) only to get cancer , his reign to be shortened, and overshadowed by his kids drama (Meg/Harry and book, and now Will/Kate). He never really got to smell the roses. Charles was overshadowed by Diana and then Diana’s kids.

And for years, he was humiliated by being known for telling Camilla he wanted to be her tampon while the Queen wouldn’t let him divorce and there was a time where Charles being king was largely objected to by the public