Kane from Kaneshow divorcing and crying on air right now

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No clue if this is relevant in this situation but this came up while I was reading about limited vs absolute divorce in MD:

"Some couples choose to enter into a SEPARATION AGREEMENT before they file for divorce, or while they are waiting for their divorce to be final. A separation agreement is a contract between the two of you and can govern child custody, child support, spousal support, use, ownership or distribution of a home, car or personal property, and other issues, during the separation period."

On May 15, Natasha posted a checklist on IG and "Contract to Peter" was on the list.

I find it hard to believe that she had one drawn up before she left because a lawyer would have told her NOT to leave the way she did. That's abandonment and a huge no-no!

Unless, of course, she didn't tell her lawyer about the fleeing part.....

What I was wondering is..what if this is/was actually a relatively amicable split, and that Kane's on-air version of the story isn't quite how it really went down. Maybe in a malicious way or maybe to get attention for both of them (would increase his ratings, drive hits to her blog, new followers on SM, etc)? I know it sounds crazy, especially given how cruel people have been to Natasha..just thinking.

I don't think this would increase his ratings though. I've read that a lot of people are actually turning away from the show now because he aired such a private and personal thing.

I find that hard to believe considering the length of this thread. Can't believe so many people are interested in Kane's personal life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No clue if this is relevant in this situation but this came up while I was reading about limited vs absolute divorce in MD:

"Some couples choose to enter into a SEPARATION AGREEMENT before they file for divorce, or while they are waiting for their divorce to be final. A separation agreement is a contract between the two of you and can govern child custody, child support, spousal support, use, ownership or distribution of a home, car or personal property, and other issues, during the separation period."

On May 15, Natasha posted a checklist on IG and "Contract to Peter" was on the list.

That was posted on her IG right before she went on vacation Memorial weekend... I think she made the decision to seperate and decided to tell him right before she left on her planned vacation. Who knows how he took it? I don't think the May 2 sobstory he gave makes any sense, clearly she was home up untl May 15 at least. She decides to move forward with the seperation, and in typical controlling man fashion, he retaliates. Just a hunch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Also want to add, on May 6 (4 days after the fight and when Nat supposedly stole the family and all their stuff) John posted a pic with Kane and Natasha's daughters, he had taken them out to dinner while Natasha was at the hospital with Kane. On June 21st, John again posted a pic with Kane's daughter and said it was family night at Kane's house.

3 months?? Come on people, none of what Kane said makes sense. I'm sure there is some truth, but this timeline crap is such a major lie. At most, Nat took them for a month or less,and I'm starting to believe that this was a planned vacation that Kane knew about, like her family is saying.

Maybe he should have said she left 2 3/4 months ago instead of 3 Just because he said she took his kids 3 months ago doesn't mean he hasn't seen them at all. If I went from seeing my kids every day to seeking them only sometimes, when I describe how long the situation has been going on, I wouldn't restart the clock each time I saw my kids. The point is, according to him, for the past 3 months his access to his kids has been limited. Also, even if she was at the hospital on May 6 because of his accident doesn't necessarily mean what he said about her leaving on the 2nd and taking everything is a lie. She could have done that and only came back because of the accident, because her lawyer told her to, because she changed her mind about leaving....Hypothetically, if your spouse left you in the middle of the night, cleaned out the safe, bank accounts.....but came back 3 or 4 days later, would that change the fact that they did that to you in the first place? I'm not saying what he said was true, just pointing out that the timeline he set out isn't necessarily full of lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also want to add, on May 6 (4 days after the fight and when Nat supposedly stole the family and all their stuff) John posted a pic with Kane and Natasha's daughters, he had taken them out to dinner while Natasha was at the hospital with Kane. On June 21st, John again posted a pic with Kane's daughter and said it was family night at Kane's house.

3 months?? Come on people, none of what Kane said makes sense. I'm sure there is some truth, but this timeline crap is such a major lie. At most, Nat took them for a month or less,and I'm starting to believe that this was a planned vacation that Kane knew about, like her family is saying.

Maybe he should have said she left 2 3/4 months ago instead of 3 Just because he said she took his kids 3 months ago doesn't mean he hasn't seen them at all. If I went from seeing my kids every day to seeking them only sometimes, when I describe how long the situation has been going on, I wouldn't restart the clock each time I saw my kids. The point is, according to him, for the past 3 months his access to his kids has been limited. Also, even if she was at the hospital on May 6 because of his accident doesn't necessarily mean what he said about her leaving on the 2nd and taking everything is a lie. She could have done that and only came back because of the accident, because her lawyer told her to, because she changed her mind about leaving....Hypothetically, if your spouse left you in the middle of the night, cleaned out the safe, bank accounts.....but came back 3 or 4 days later, would that change the fact that they did that to you in the first place? I'm not saying what he said was true, just pointing out that the timeline he set out isn't necessarily full of lies.

None of what you said makes sense. This is more like 3-4 weeks (IF THAT), not 2 3/4 months, not even close. I understand (no actually I don't, but I'll pretend I do) the undyling loyalty Kane's listeners have for him, but the facts is The timeline that he built his whole sob story on simply doesn't add up. No way she took away his whole world (kids, pets, money, cars) and came back a couple days later like no big deal posting a loving message about how she is taking care of him after his accident. On May 3 in the afternoon he posted a loving collage of the two of them and said he loves Nat SO much. On May 4, she posted a to-do list that included getting flowers the next day for teacher appreciation. On May 10 she posts about organizing her nail polish collection, around May 14 Kane posts a pic of some blue hair dye box of his wife's and teasingly calls her "NattyPery", on May 15 she posts a to-do list that includes things like a doc appt, etc. It's simply ludicrous that people are pretending like she stole his money, ran away with his kids and pets.... If she left to get away (possibly after approaching about a seperation) then that is perfectly normal. She wasn't in hiding. Look at John's IG, too. He posts everytime he is with the girls and he was with them in May, June AND July. Anytime people seperate, you don't get to see your kids everyday. That's life. Saying your wife cleaned out your house, stopped paying all the bills, took your pets and animals on a specific day when it is proven to not be true, is questionable.

[Anonymous]

Annoying how he flirts with rose

[Anonymous]

I can't believe people are still posting asking their names. ...

[Anonymous]

RE: the timeline not matching up - Maybe he can't count? After all, he dumped the responsibility of paying bills/managing their assets on his wife who is a shopaholic...maybe he couldn't balance a checkbook? Makes sense that he might have trouble counting days/weeks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:a few months ago on STM they were talking about how whenever they googled their names or their personal websites it would get redirected to something else. (ex. if you googled stm.com or whatever their website is it took you to the definition of 'failure', if you google tybentley.com it took you to the wiki page for diarrhea.) They said they had a feeling they knew who it was and they would update us when they found out. I suspected it was intern john but does anyone know if they ever followed up on that?

Yes, they were able to prove thanks to some outside help (go back on the podcasts, you can get it on iTunes) how everything was done. It came from someone at 1801 Rockville Pike, where the 99.5 studio is located.

I can understand why they were upset, but this is seriously hysterical.

I remember when the whole website issue was discussed on STM, and the whole bit seemed so fake to me. They clearly knew who was behind it and just seemed to want to take another dig at their competition. While it is sophmoric , it is not like it had not been done before by Kane himself while Mel at least worked at 99.5. When 107.3 first switched from Mix to All the Hits, it was reported as part of the news story that Kane bought some of the domain names.

https://radioinsight.com/blog/headlines/netgnomes/84727/wrqx-ditching-its-mix-moniker-for-all-the-hits/

It sounded to me like this was simply part of the games played in the industry, and that they should have thought about that and ensured they snatched up their website names before they were unavailable.?

To me, that bit was only done to garner sympathy.?

[Anonymous]

Q: How long before he moves the show to Tampa?

Her family is there, so that's where she will want to be with the kids. He works weekends, so how can he possibly manage visitation from several states away? He's going to move the show there once the divorce goes through.

Next question: will you still listen to the show if it originates from Tampa?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I promise I don't know Kane or Natasha, but I have no life and did some investigating: It's so ridiculous to believe that Natasha abandoned him and stole the kids. He had the kids plenty of times in the last 2 months to show that his "3 month" timeline is simply not possible. He took them to Disney a month ago and then to visit him mom for a week. Also on May 3 at 1:30 p.m., he posted a collage on his IG from his wedding and how much he loves Nat.. So the day he wakes up to supposedly finds out she stole all his money, he posts about his love for her??? On May 6 she posts a pic with him in the hospital after his accident. Something is not adding up. EVEN if she left May 2... 3 months wouldn't be until Aug. 2. Does he have a time machine? If he is going to air his dirty laundry, he should have been 10000% factual because otherwise one little inaccuracy makes people question everything. She was with him on May 6, but supposedly left May 2 (and he was very specific about it being the night of the fight). She was gone for 3 months, but it hasn't even BEEN 3 months. Too many little lies. And if he's so rich, why take out 1.3 MILLION in loans for a house that costs 1.5 million?? That is a major mortgage. I think money problems (on both their ends), resentment, OCD, ADHD, other possible mental issues, etc. resulted in the perfect storm for this marriage to fail. I'm sure fault lies on BOTH ends, but the way he handled it- deliberately making her out to seem like the evil schemer, was wrong. I'm sure she has issues..but she is not the first Stay at home mom who spends too much money... I'd like to introduce you to half my friends. THat is something that can be worked out pretty easily with some commitment.

Did he take them TO Disney, or did he fly down to Florida to see his kids? Was granted time with them, and then took them over to Disney.
This actually may support some of his version of the events.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Q: How long before he moves the show to Tampa?

Her family is there, so that's where she will want to be with the kids. He works weekends, so how can he possibly manage visitation from several states away? He's going to move the show there once the divorce goes through.

Next question: will you still listen to the show if it originates from Tampa?

He was previously on the air in Tampa, on FLZ. I've been listening to Kane forever, as I went to school in Florida, and was excited when he came back here.
If ClearChannel would have allowed him to broadcast from Florida, I doubt he would have moved up here in the first place.
DC is a much larger market than Tampa, Baltimore or some of the Ohio spots he's on in.

[Anonymous]

I think he fly to Florida alone, as the girls were already there, when he took them to Disney.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I promise I don't know Kane or Natasha, but I have no life and did some investigating: It's so ridiculous to believe that Natasha abandoned him and stole the kids. He had the kids plenty of times in the last 2 months to show that his "3 month" timeline is simply not possible. He took them to Disney a month ago and then to visit him mom for a week. Also on May 3 at 1:30 p.m., he posted a collage on his IG from his wedding and how much he loves Nat.. So the day he wakes up to supposedly finds out she stole all his money, he posts about his love for her??? On May 6 she posts a pic with him in the hospital after his accident. Something is not adding up. EVEN if she left May 2... 3 months wouldn't be until Aug. 2. Does he have a time machine? If he is going to air his dirty laundry, he should have been 10000% factual because otherwise one little inaccuracy makes people question everything. She was with him on May 6, but supposedly left May 2 (and he was very specific about it being the night of the fight). She was gone for 3 months, but it hasn't even BEEN 3 months. Too many little lies. And if he's so rich, why take out 1.3 MILLION in loans for a house that costs 1.5 million?? That is a major mortgage. I think money problems (on both their ends), resentment, OCD, ADHD, other possible mental issues, etc. resulted in the perfect storm for this marriage to fail. I'm sure fault lies on BOTH ends, but the way he handled it- deliberately making her out to seem like the evil schemer, was wrong. I'm sure she has issues..but she is not the first Stay at home mom who spends too much money... I'd like to introduce you to half my friends. THat is something that can be worked out pretty easily with some commitment.

Did he take them TO Disney, or did he fly down to Florida to see his kids? Was granted time with them, and then took them over to Disney.
This actually may support some of his version of the events.

Even so, it doesn't support the idea that she left May 2 for 3 months, or that she stole the kids and kept them away from him. He was with them plenty all summer. How is anyone even trying to justify that LIE on his part? If it was Nat who said it, people would be out with the pitchforks and torches. She clearly didn't go for the first time until end of May.. Then she was clearly back in June...all of this is supported not only by HER IG, but John's and Kane's as well. She was never gone for a 3 month or even 2 month long timeframe. She possibly went back to Florida again after school, and then he came, took them to Disney and took them again out of state to visit his mom... and now they are all in MD. NONE of this supports any 3 month time frame of wiping out his bank accounts, stealing the kids and pets..etc. All it shows is a family having marital issues and getting away from eachother, running to the comfort of their own families/loved ones. Like the rest of the world who goes through hard times. IMO

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I promise I don't know Kane or Natasha, but I have no life and did some investigating: It's so ridiculous to believe that Natasha abandoned him and stole the kids. He had the kids plenty of times in the last 2 months to show that his "3 month" timeline is simply not possible. He took them to Disney a month ago and then to visit him mom for a week. Also on May 3 at 1:30 p.m., he posted a collage on his IG from his wedding and how much he loves Nat.. So the day he wakes up to supposedly finds out she stole all his money, he posts about his love for her??? On May 6 she posts a pic with him in the hospital after his accident. Something is not adding up. EVEN if she left May 2... 3 months wouldn't be until Aug. 2. Does he have a time machine? If he is going to air his dirty laundry, he should have been 10000% factual because otherwise one little inaccuracy makes people question everything. She was with him on May 6, but supposedly left May 2 (and he was very specific about it being the night of the fight). She was gone for 3 months, but it hasn't even BEEN 3 months. Too many little lies. And if he's so rich, why take out 1.3 MILLION in loans for a house that costs 1.5 million?? That is a major mortgage. I think money problems (on both their ends), resentment, OCD, ADHD, other possible mental issues, etc. resulted in the perfect storm for this marriage to fail. I'm sure fault lies on BOTH ends, but the way he handled it- deliberately making her out to seem like the evil schemer, was wrong. I'm sure she has issues..but she is not the first Stay at home mom who spends too much money... I'd like to introduce you to half my friends. THat is something that can be worked out pretty easily with some commitment.

Did he take them TO Disney, or did he fly down to Florida to see his kids? Was granted time with them, and then took them over to Disney.
This actually may support some of his version of the events.

Even so, it doesn't support the idea that she left May 2 for 3 months, or that she stole the kids and kept them away from him. He was with them plenty all summer. How is anyone even trying to justify that LIE on his part? If it was Nat who said it, people would be out with the pitchforks and torches. She clearly didn't go for the first time until end of May.. Then she was clearly back in June...all of this is supported not only by HER IG, but John's and Kane's as well. She was never gone for a 3 month or even 2 month long timeframe. She possibly went back to Florida again after school, and then he came, took them to Disney and took them again out of state to visit his mom... and now they are all in MD. NONE of this supports any 3 month time frame of wiping out his bank accounts, stealing the kids and pets..etc. All it shows is a family having marital issues and getting away from eachother, running to the comfort of their own families/loved ones. Like the rest of the world who goes through hard times. IMO

+1. But what a surprise that a man who's built a career out of being a pathological liar would also lie about his divorce. I'm just surprised there are so many gullible people who are falling for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Q: How long before he moves the show to Tampa?

Her family is there, so that's where she will want to be with the kids. He works weekends, so how can he possibly manage visitation from several states away? He's going to move the show there once the divorce goes through.

Next question: will you still listen to the show if it originates from Tampa?

If it's still played in this area, why not? I don't care where the actual people are located