This is criminal. Yet, elected MAGA is silent. Can you IMAGINE if a Dem had done this, or even 1/4 of what this corrupt admin had done. |
What are you talking about? I didn't see that. Was that a nutjob on the internet who posted it or was it something our DOJ (the top legal entity of the US) posted? |
It was the Dems on oversight who blacked out the faces of the adult Hawaiian Tropic Models--even though the picture had been in public. It seemed to imply the models were underage--which they weren't. |
You know, they could still be victims, he is a convicted rapist. They could also be protecting their identities, who wants to be seen as socializing with Epstein’s bestie boo? Of course, none of that means that he isn’t a pedo. |
There were trafficked victims who were over age 18. |
The GOP would be screaming their heads off. With all those redacted pages, now we know GOP = Guardians of Pedophiles |
You are wrong. The media widely reported, and the Dem oversight committee members explained multiple times, that they wanted to err on the side of caution and anytime they were not absolutely sure that photographed women were consenting adults, with identification and consent to display their photos, they decided to protect their identities just on the outside chance they might turn out to be victims. Even I know this, and I haven't been following closely in the past few weeks. |
|
It's probably the photo we already saw with Mar A Lago in the background and a young woman next to men holding a large check. I seem to recall that particular transaction was associated with denigrating language about the woman in question, something like "selling you this depreciated asset" or some such words... |
|
Came across a page of a victim naming men she had engaged in sexual activity with. The men's names were all redacted.
Yes, you got that right. The men. The perps. Their names were redacted. It is utter BS that they only redacted victims. https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/s/PkYJzylGMs |